1/42
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
definition of international law
the body of principles, customs and rules, recognized bas effectively binding obligations by sovereign states and such other entities as have been granted international personality
principles
foundational to the system - determine the basic system structure
overarching - above all other laws, rules, and regulations
define the boundaries of a system
customs
patterns of behavior
tradition
rules
explicit
govern specific behavior within an issue area
law
system of rules and regulations that sets the framework in an issue area
public international law
law that governs relations between states in the international system
private international law
law that governs conflict between citizens of two or more states
state
a country with legal political entity
must possess a permanent population, a defined territory, government, sovereignty, recognition, and the capacity to enter into relations with the other states
recognition of a state
full recognition - majority of UN and full agreement of the 5 permanent members of the security council
if one of those 5 disagrees and uses their veto power, then the area can not be recognized as a state
5 permanent members of UN security council
China
France
Russia
The United Kingdom
The United States
sovereignty
absolute authority over a specific territory and population
authority - power backed by legitimacy
Article 2(7) of the Chapter of the United Nations
all members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any manner inconsistent with the purpsoes of the United Nations
non state actors with international personality
intergovernmental organizations - members of these organizations are all states
non governmental organizations
corporations
international
relations between sovereign states and entities in which sovereign states are primary actors
bilateral and multilateral interactions
interactions involving governmental organizations
transnational
involving interactions of all actors outside the boundaries of sovereign states
governmental and non governmental organizations
corporations
West International Law
traced back to the Egyptians, the Babylonians, and The Greeks
The Romans
Jus civile - the body of law that applied to Roman citizens
Jus gentium - the body of law that applied to non roman citizens who were part of the Roman Empire
Asia
India
Dharmashastra and Arthashastra travced back to 4th century BC and Kautilya
China
LI (confucianism)
FA (legalism)
More development
Christian Europe international law developed from canon law
just war (right of conquest with the sanction of the Church)
Treaty of Tordesillas a treaty signed by Spain & Portugal to divide any new discoveries (Spain had access to the west of the line, while Portugal had access to unclaimed territory east of the line)
Question of Res Nullius
fall of Constantinople in 1453 and closing of land bridge in Asia led to European empires to use the sea as their primary means of trade
sea routes led to the discovery of “new” lands
the doctrine that emerged classified these lands as those without owners and hence available for taking
The Treaty of Westphalia
1648
marked the end of the 30 year war and the beginning of the secularization of European politics
trade
with the increase in the demand for raw materials and the search for enw markets, international transactions increased
laws against piracy
mare liberum - the doctrine of the freedom of the seas
war
restrictions on the use of force transcend sovereignty
Hague conventions
Marten’s Clause
Until there is more guidance regarding laws centered around law, populations and combatants are protected by existing international law, the laws of humanity, and public conscience
League of nations
post WWI organization that was created to end all wars
had no independent “enforcement” capability such as enacting collective sanctions or sending troops
ultimately failed due to its members lacking the will to stand against persistent aggression
United Nations
post WWII organization created to protect and advance international space and security
legitimized the state as a necessary form of political organization for participation in international society
dependent upon a plan to centralize the sue of force in service of maintaining order (collective security)
force would only be used as a an authorized sanction taken after collective deliberation
post WWII
transnational activity increased and new challenges emerged
social welfare and justice issues emerged as points of discussion (ex post colonialism, racial justice, and economic inequality)
challenges of state sovereignty such as limits on use of force, prohibition of genocide, demands for human rights, and transnational economic transactions also appeared
collapse of USSR in the early 1990s
after this collapse and the rise of neo-liberal capitalism, globalization emerged as a force for both unification and defragmentation regarding environmental issues, common heritage, human rights and identity, and terrorism
challenges to international law today
erosion of sovereignty and consequent lack of respect for the state
increasing use of force in international and transnational interactions
natural law
based either on the divine or human reason
Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274)
believed natural law constituted the basic principles of practical rationality and that all human beings possess a basic knowledge of the principles of natural law
good is to be done and evil is to be avoided
Francisco de Vitoria (1480-1546)
primarily focused on the question what made war a just one, but he also examined Spanish authority in the Americas
he was concerned for the rights and treatment of indigenous peoples
Francisco Suarez (1548-1617)
believed that jus gentium differed from natural law because it formed a body of law that applied between independent states rather than as a common law to all states
this argument laid the foundation for the idea of consent as the basis for a distinct set of rules voluntarily established by men)
Hugo Grotius (1583-1645)
modern analysts see him as the father of international law
believed jus gentium represented law that was both human (not divine in origin) and volitional (a body of rules deliberately created by human beings to serve human needs)
urged moderation in warfare
also believed that superiors were not the sole individuals entitled to inflict punishment, but also equals (ex war)
Samuel Pufendorf (1632-1694)
the world’s first professor of international law
believed in the existence of a state and law of nature that was binding by all men
that kind of law rather than state consent could establish legally binding principles and hence be regarded as the sole source of international law
positivism
law must be written down and agreed upon
focuses on the precision in the meaning of the word
enlightenment traditions
the centrality of human beinga
customs and practice
social contracts
sovereignty and self limitation
consent (states as creators and subjects of law)
right of self defense
aggression
feminist approaches
critical of patriarchy systems
the public private dichotomy - the convention on torture
torture
article 1 of the UN treaty defines the term torture as any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity
does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions
this definition does not cover the same behavior when the perpetrator is not acting in an official capacity
tension between universal rights and cultural mediation
are there some rights that are universally applicable or are all rights to be modified by the culture to which they are applied?
can or should the International community determine what the cultural practices are appropriate?
critical approach
study of the history behind the language of law
opposed to positivism and the scientific rationality
study of the context of the law (colonial heritage and western traditions)
soft law
include hortatory, rather than legally binding obligations
aspirational principles
louis henkin states
law establishes and maintains order in society
enhances the reliability of expectations
protects person and property and promotes the welfare of individuals and the values of a society
why do states obey law
fear of punishment
credibility
habit
enlightened self interest
enables peaceful interaction between states
leads to civilization and civilized states
is international law really law?
interplay of law and politics (ex does consent to international law nullify sovereignty? + implicit acceptance of the constitution)
not uniformly universal
is it simply morality?
the objective standard argument
obedience (do violations mean that law does not exist)
enforcement (does lack of consistent enforcement mean that law does not exist?)