1/7
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
innatism
epistemological theory that from birth, our minds contain certain concepts and knowledge, that are called innate ideas
WEAK CLAIM - all synthetic and a priori knowledge is in us from birth
Reason, not senses
Substantial and not just true by definition
Leibniz: all a priori are necessary and innate
Minds rely on, even if unaware eg ‘It is impossible for the same thing to be and not to be’
Work out from minds, there all along
STRONG criticism – not universal ideas
Locke: not everyone shares ideas
‘children and idiots’ do not know of infinity or 2 + 3 = 5
WEAK rebuild – would know it
If used reason to work it it
If innate, why discover?
WEAK CLAIM - Plato: mathematical knowledge is innate
Learning is just remembering what we already have knowledge of
Socrates’ Meno slave boy, geometrical theory, from mind
FATAL criticism - know from experience, not reason
Sense experience of shapes
2 + 3 = 5 know 2 and three things
all is a posteriori
WEAKEST criticism – empiricists attacking innatist universals
Innatists: could not understand universals eg ‘beauty’ from experience bc no infinite number of sense impressions
Form idea of large number without seeing that many
CONCLUSION
not in us from birth or universal
maths is sense experience
universals can be known through sense impressions