1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Pure speech
verbal expression of thought and opinion before an audience that has chosen to listen; most common form of speech
Symbolic speech
the use of action and symbols, in addition to or instead of words, to express opinions
defamatory speech
false speech that damages a person's reputation, character, or good name
slander
defamatory speech that is spoken
libel
defamatory speech that is written
¨fighting words¨
These are words spoken face-to-face that are likely to cause immediate violence & thus not protected by free speech
seditious speech
any speech urging the resistance to lawful authority or advocating the overthrow of the government
Gitlow v. New York
In 1925, court held speech could be restricted even if it had only a tendency to lead to illegal action, establishing the bad tendency doctrine
United States v. O'Brien
1968: Government can regulate or forbid expressive conduct if regulation (1) falls within the constitutional power of government, (2) is narrowly drawn to further a substantial government interest that is unrelated to the suppression of free speech, and (3) leaves open ample alternative channels of communication
clear and present danger rule
Interpretation of the First Amendment that holds that the government cannot interfere with speech unless the speech presents that it will lead to evil or illegal acts
Schenck v. United States
1919: Speech may be punished if it creates a clear and present danger test of illegal acts
Bad Tendency Doctrine
Interpretation of the First Amendment that would allow the Congress or state legislatures to prohibit or limit speech or expression that had the tendency to cause or incite illegal activity; need to maintain order more than balances any damages done to basic freedoms
preferred position doctrine
1st amendment freedoms are more fundamental because they provide basis for all liberties
Bethel School District v. Fraser
1986: Gave public school officials the authority to suspend students for speech considered to be lewd or indecent speech at school events
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier
1988: the Court held that school officials have sweeping authority to regulate student speech in school-sponsored newspapers, theatrical productions, and other activities