Exceptions to the Exclusionary Rule

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
linked notesView linked note
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/9

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

This set of flashcards covers key cases and principles related to exceptions to the exclusionary rule in U.S. law.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

10 Terms

1
New cards

What was the outcome of US v. Leon (1984)?

Evidence seized in 'good faith' will be admissible even if the original search or seizure was later determined to be illegal.

2
New cards

What is the 'plain view doctrine' as established in Harris v. VS (1968)?

If law enforcement has a legal right to be in a location, they can seize evidence that is in plain view.

3
New cards

What does exigent circumstances refer to in Warden v. Hayden (1967)?

Exigent circumstances refer to emergency circumstances that allow searches without a warrant.

4
New cards

What did the ruling in Hudson v. Michigan (2006) establish regarding the 'knock and announce' rule?

The 'knock and announce' rule can be set aside; evidence obtained after a violation cannot invoke the exclusionary rule.

5
New cards

What was significant about the ruling in US v. Grubbs (2006)?

Search warrants can be issued on probable cause even if the evidence is not yet at the location, as long as it will be there when the warrant is executed.

6
New cards

What was established by the 'free to leave' test in VS v. Mendenhall (1980)?

The test assesses whether a person's freedom of movement was restrained to a degree associated with an arrest.

7
New cards

What case established the principle of 'stop and frisk' based on reasonable suspicion?

Terry v. Ohio (1968) established the principle of 'stop and frisk' based on reasonable suspicion.

8
New cards

What did the Supreme Court decide in Brown v. Texas (1971)?

A person cannot be punished for refusing to identify themselves if there is no probable cause against them.

9
New cards

What is the significance of Hibel v. 6th Judicial Circuit Court of Nevada (2004)?

If police have reasonable suspicion, a person must identify themselves; otherwise, it may violate their rights.

10
New cards

What did California v. Hodori (1991) determine about abandoned evidence?

Abandoned evidence may be seized without a warrant, for example, trash or items thrown during a chase.