1/49
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Describe macroevolutionary trends
Directional evolutionary changes over long periods of time
Not single species lineages, mostly clade scale (large scale patterns)
Describe how to identify a macroevolutionary trend
need to look at the whole distribution
in order for it to be an actual trend, we need to see an actual change in the mean, not just the variance
What is a trend
some mean change in phenotype
Describe the island rule
large organisms on islands tend to become smaller
opposite happens with small organisms on islands (become bigger)
List and describe the scope macroevolutionary trends can takeÂ
Geographic scope
Many trends are based on shifts based on global scale
eg. mainland to island, latitude, etc.
Phylogenetic scope
eg. on a clade scale
Temporal scope
over a few mya, or entire periods
List and describe the two kinds of trend dynamics
passive
heterogeneity, bias towards 1 direction but there are conflicting directions
Driven
homogeneity, arises with similar evolutionary trajectories for every clade
True or false: the different kinds of trend dynamics ALWAYS result in different outcomes
False. They can result in the same outcome (eg. body size)
True or false: Passive trend dynamics doesn’t mean neutral
False. Trend dynamic doesn’t indicate causation
How can we distinguish passive versus driven evolutionary trends? Describe each.
based on an increase of mode or minimum
take samples from different times
judge difference in values
Skewed distribution with passive; more normal distribution with driven bc the entire clade is evolving in the same direction
Subclade test
driven distribution of traits for subclade will be similar to whole clade
passive distribution of clade will be less similar to clade
List within species causes of macroevolutionary trends
Driven natural selection
Driven constraints
Passive natural selection
Passive constraints
describe driven selection as a within species cause of macroevolutionary trends
usually just looking at patterns; need to be wary of prescribing wrong cause to the effect
describe driven constraints as a within species cause of macroevolutionary trends
requires a directional change in the intrinsic production of variation
bias in the production of variation
may have genetic or developmental bias! NOT just based on environmental selection
describe passive natural selection as a within species cause of macroevolutionary trends
The enforcement of a boundary on one side
describe passive constraints as a within species cause of macroevolutionary trends
A lot of values just simply cannot be smaller than 0
this creates limits to production of variation > proceeds in other direction, away from hard boundary
Describe the difference between a boundary and a constraint
if a variant cant be produced at all, its a constraint
if the variation cant be passed to the next generation, then its a boundary
What is the key distinction between trends caused by natural selection versus constraint?
you cant tell just by just looking at pattern alone!
need to know something about variation and selection
List the among species causes of macroevolutionary trends
directional speciation
differential speciation rate
differential extinction rate
selective mass extinction
Describe directional speciation as an among species cause of macroevolutionary trends
bias in production of new species \
branching lineage has more value
sort of like constraint
biased production of species
Describe differential speciation rate as an among species cause of macroevolutionary trends
higher speciation rate in one direction, or lower extinction rate
biased on variation being produced
List the ways we test for the phylogenetic signatures of macroevolutionary trends
Quantify change in fossil record
Test for phylogenetic signatures of trends
Describe how we quantify changes in macroevolutionary trends in the fossil record
directly measure morphology in fossils from individual lineages
plot morphology against time
Test whether model trend explains data
model in which mean is changing over time
Describe how we test for the phylogenetic signatures of macroevolutionary trends
for discrete traits, test for evidence of biased character transition rates
are state changes biased in one direction than the other in the character
Is there a trend one way or another?
score all species > fit model . score likelihood in all transitions
For continuous traits:
Collect data for living AND EXTINCT data
cant just collect from living species (for most part)
Obtain phylogeny for species
Assess the fit of trend model of trait evolution
Trend model is just brownian motion model in which random walk is based on direction
mu is directional bias per unit time
What is complexity
an increasing function of the number of types of parts or interactions a system has
What is Cope’s rule?
evolutionary lineages increase in body size over time
What might be the benefit to a lineage increasing in body size over time?
better capture prey, avoid predators
increased reproductive success (sexual selection)
Increased intelligence (bigger brains)
increased variety of available food
decreased mortality risk
increased longevity
increased heat retention
Describe Dollo’s Law
organism never returns exactly to former state, even if it finds itself in exact same conditions- always keeps some trace of intermediate evolutionary stages
evolution doesn’t revert back along the same sequence
more of a probabilistic statement
reflects historical constraint- evolution is path dependent
expresses a directional trend, not absolute (can be violated sometimes)
often invoked to explain the failure of complex traits to “re evolve” once lost
List and describe the mechanisms behind Dollo’s Law
Genetic decay
genes for lost traits accumulate disabling mutations or are deleted (eg.. enamel genes in edentulous vertebrates)
genes become silenced
“undefended target” for mutations
Developmental rewiring
once pathways are dismantled, re assembly is improbable
developmental basis may be rewired and therefore lost
also “undefended target”
Functional replacement
other traits evolve to take over the same role (some other solution)
Provide an example of Dollo’s Law
loss of teeth in numerous lineages of vertebrates
turtles
birds
baleen whales, pangolins, anteaters
teeth never re evolve in these lineages
Describe an exception to Dollo’s law
a complex trait can re evolve long after it was lost if genetic potential remains
Gastrotheca guentheri re evolved teeth after 200 mya absence
still had teeth on upper jaw, so possible heterotrophy
gene for upper jaw teeth re adapted for teeth on lower jaw, too?
Re evolution more likely if homologs are present somewhere else in body?
What obstacles might prevent organisms from finding, consuming, or defending resources?
competition
predation
food defense (prey defending itself from you)
Describe tempo in evolution
the rate of evolutionary change through time
Describe mode in evolution
the model by which evolutionary processes result in evolutionary pattern
the pattern we expect to come from a particular model
Briefly describe how we measure the rate of trait evolution, and what we need to take into account when we do this
usually not possible to directly measure instantaneous rate of evolution, measure net rate instead
easy to get from fossil record
However, net rate assumes that evolution is linear, when we want proportional measurements instead
To account for this, we log transform measurements so that they are reflective of whats actually happening
Describe the H (haldane)
a measure of net evolutionary rate
Evolutionary change measured in standard deviations of the log transformed trait (at pop level) per generation
used to standardize measurements between generations
What are the pros of measuring net rates of evolution using log transformations
simple
can be applied at any temporal scale
very versatileÂ
What are the cons to measuring net rates of evolution using log transformations
may poorly approximate instantaneous rates
evolution can move in many different directions and ways!
Underestimate instantaneous rates if there are evolutionary reversalsÂ
lots of biases, can miss a lot
worse over long periods of time
worse when evolution fluctuates
Explain how we can use brownian motion to estimate instantaneous rates of evolution
if we assume evolution happens in a pattern similar to brownian motion, we can use it to incorporate all the quirks!
not many parameters (simple)
rate of evolution only true parameter
can fit data set to find pattern
Trait diversity is a function of rate of evolution and phylogenic history, so if we have phylogenetic data and trait measurements, we can work backwards and estimate rate of evolution
Describe the paradox of evolutionary rate, and provide a possible explanation
seem to see slower rates over longer time scales
seem to see faster rates over shorter time scales
Explanation:Â
possibly due to the scaling of evolutionary rates?
possibly missing “wiggles” of evolution with long time scales
But still weird…?
List and describe the two types of factors that shape evolutionary rates
extrinsic factors
ecological controls
intrinsic factors
inherited constraints
List and describe Simpsons 3 modes of evolution
phyletic evolution
continuous, gradual trait evolution within a single ancestor descendant lineage
speciation
Continuous trait divergence among populations of a speciating lineageÂ
quantum evolution
Dramatic, evolutionary change in a trait, in which intermediates are transient (if present at all)
really is saltational
pop basically jumping from one way of life (adaptive zone) to another
List and describe the evolutionary discontinuities used to argue for saltational evolution
sudden shifts in the fossil record
obv. in this case, it would reflect a dramatic change in a trait/shift of adaptive zones
Distinctness of higher taxa
similarities within groups, then something looks distinct
eg. turtles, lizards, and crocodiles all look very different despite all being reptiles
thus, possible saltational differences between groups?
Explain why gradualism can produce evolutionary discontinuities
sudden shifts in the fossil record can look saltational when missing chunks of rock strata, so it looks like the fossils suddenly jump from one trait to another (but they didnt actually, were just missing parts of the record)
higher taxa may look distinct because the ancestors of the taxa that look more intermediate have gone extinct
Issues with discontinuous fossil and phylogenetic data are inherently ____ problems
sampling problems