Informed Consent and Shared Decision Making
- Informed consent- process of getting someone’s permission to receive a medical intervention/participate in research
- It’s ongoing- they might get more information about treatment/study, change their mind
- new information may also come to light
- 3 components of informed consent
- Disclosure- they’re given all information needed to make an informed choice
- Concerns
- Information needs to be comprehensible at their level
- How much information should be given?
- Capacity- they have ability to understand information and make reasoned judgment about whether or not to agree
- Voluntariness- they’re free to choose without any coercion/manipulation from family members, physicians, researchers, socioeconomic factors
- Information needed for informed consent
- Why treatment/study is being done
- Each step of treatment/study
- Benefits & risks (benefit can’t be compensation)
- Any compensation (only applies for research)
- How to withdraw
- Also need to tell them what is not known if applicable
- Need capacity to have informed consent
- But legal guardians can consent on their behalf
- If they have some capacity, their opinions are considered
- How is informed consent gathered?
- Written document with signature
- Verbal
- Only for low-risk situations
- Can be documented
- Assent- agreement to participate by someone under 18 because they can’t legally consent
- Informed consent still needs to be given by guardians
- But assent is important because it acknowledges adolescents’ ability to make decisions
- Emergency situations where patient is unable to give informed consent
- Use surrogate
- If no surrogate- medical team makes best judgment abt what patient would want
- Assumption is usually made that they would want all treatment
- Differs across contexts
- Eastern cultures may emphasize “family informed consent”
- Low literacy areas = inability to document consent
- Consider language fluency of people reading documents
- Overall purpose of informed consent
- Protection of human rights
- Educates patient’s/participants about what they’re agreeing to
- Communication between clinicians/researchers & patients/participants
Shared Decision Making
- Shared decision making- collaborative process of determining course of care between patients and clinicians
- Patient needs capacity to participate
- Honors autonomy
- Resists paternalism
- Clinicians educate patients on
- Available treatment options
- Pros and cons of those options
- Clinician retains right to refuse to provide the treatment patient is requesting based on
- If they don’t believe treatment will be beneficial/effective
- They aren’t trained to provide this treatment (out of scope of practice)
- They have moral objections to providing this treatment
- Limits to this- can’t deny care to someone based on race, gender, sexual orientation
- Barriers to shared decision making
- Time- clinicians have little time w/ patients, not all options can be discussed
- Expertise- clinician may not know abt every possibility/new options
- Rapport- patients may not trust clinicians to help them make decisions
- Patient may prefer paternalistic approach
- Some patients may not have educational background to help them understand info
- Language barriers between patient and provider
- Clinician may not fully understand patient’s values