Informed Consent and Shared Decision Making
Informed Consent
- - process of getting someone’s permission to receive a medical intervention/participate in research * It’s ongoing- they might get more information about treatment/study, change their mind * new information may also come to light
- 3 components of informed consent * - they’re given all information needed to make an informed choice * Concerns * Information needs to be comprehensible at their level * How much information should be given? * - they have ability to understand information and make reasoned judgment about whether or not to agree * - they’re free to choose without any coercion/manipulation from family members, physicians, researchers, socioeconomic factors
- Information needed for informed consent * Why treatment/study is being done * Each step of treatment/study * Benefits & risks (benefit can’t be compensation) * Any compensation (only applies for research) * How to withdraw
- Also need to tell them what is not known if applicable
- Need capacity to have informed consent * But legal guardians can consent on their behalf * If they have some capacity, their opinions are considered
- How is informed consent gathered? * Written document with signature * Verbal * Only for low-risk situations * Can be documented
- - agreement to participate by someone under 18 because they can’t legally consent * Informed consent still needs to be given by guardians * But assent is important because it acknowledges adolescents’ ability to make decisions
- Emergency situations where patient is unable to give informed consent * Use surrogate * If no surrogate- medical team makes best judgment abt what patient would want * Assumption is usually made that they would want all treatment
- Differs across contexts * Eastern cultures may emphasize “family informed consent” * Low literacy areas = inability to document consent * Consider language fluency of people reading documents
- Overall purpose of informed consent * Protection of human rights * Educates patient’s/participants about what they’re agreeing to * Communication between clinicians/researchers & patients/participants
Shared Decision Making
- collaborative process of determining course of care between patients and clinicians * Patient needs capacity to participate * Honors autonomy
- Resists paternalism
- Clinicians educate patients on * Available treatment options * Pros and cons of those options
- Clinician retains right to refuse to provide the treatment patient is requesting based on * If they don’t believe treatment will be beneficial/effective * They aren’t trained to provide this treatment (out of scope of practice) * They have moral objections to providing this treatment * Limits to this- can’t deny care to someone based on race, gender, sexual orientation
- Barriers to shared decision making * Time- clinicians have little time w/ patients, not all options can be discussed * Expertise- clinician may not know abt every possibility/new options * Rapport- patients may not trust clinicians to help them make decisions * Patient may prefer paternalistic approach * Some patients may not have educational background to help them understand info * Language barriers between patient and provider * Clinician may not fully understand patient’s values
\