Informed Consent and Shared Decision Making
Informed consent- process of getting someone’s permission to receive a medical intervention/participate in research
It’s ongoing- they might get more information about treatment/study, change their mind
new information may also come to light
3 components of informed consent
Disclosure- they’re given all information needed to make an informed choice
Concerns
Information needs to be comprehensible at their level
How much information should be given?
Capacity- they have ability to understand information and make reasoned judgment about whether or not to agree
Voluntariness- they’re free to choose without any coercion/manipulation from family members, physicians, researchers, socioeconomic factors
Information needed for informed consent
Why treatment/study is being done
Each step of treatment/study
Benefits & risks (benefit can’t be compensation)
Any compensation (only applies for research)
How to withdraw
Also need to tell them what is not known if applicable
Need capacity to have informed consent
But legal guardians can consent on their behalf
If they have some capacity, their opinions are considered
How is informed consent gathered?
Written document with signature
Verbal
Only for low-risk situations
Can be documented
Assent- agreement to participate by someone under 18 because they can’t legally consent
Informed consent still needs to be given by guardians
But assent is important because it acknowledges adolescents’ ability to make decisions
Emergency situations where patient is unable to give informed consent
Use surrogate
If no surrogate- medical team makes best judgment abt what patient would want
Assumption is usually made that they would want all treatment
Differs across contexts
Eastern cultures may emphasize “family informed consent”
Low literacy areas = inability to document consent
Consider language fluency of people reading documents
Overall purpose of informed consent
Protection of human rights
Educates patient’s/participants about what they’re agreeing to
Communication between clinicians/researchers & patients/participants
Shared decision making- collaborative process of determining course of care between patients and clinicians
Patient needs capacity to participate
Honors autonomy
Resists paternalism
Clinicians educate patients on
Available treatment options
Pros and cons of those options
Clinician retains right to refuse to provide the treatment patient is requesting based on
If they don’t believe treatment will be beneficial/effective
They aren’t trained to provide this treatment (out of scope of practice)
They have moral objections to providing this treatment
Limits to this- can’t deny care to someone based on race, gender, sexual orientation
Barriers to shared decision making
Time- clinicians have little time w/ patients, not all options can be discussed
Expertise- clinician may not know abt every possibility/new options
Rapport- patients may not trust clinicians to help them make decisions
Patient may prefer paternalistic approach
Some patients may not have educational background to help them understand info
Language barriers between patient and provider
Clinician may not fully understand patient’s values
Informed consent- process of getting someone’s permission to receive a medical intervention/participate in research
It’s ongoing- they might get more information about treatment/study, change their mind
new information may also come to light
3 components of informed consent
Disclosure- they’re given all information needed to make an informed choice
Concerns
Information needs to be comprehensible at their level
How much information should be given?
Capacity- they have ability to understand information and make reasoned judgment about whether or not to agree
Voluntariness- they’re free to choose without any coercion/manipulation from family members, physicians, researchers, socioeconomic factors
Information needed for informed consent
Why treatment/study is being done
Each step of treatment/study
Benefits & risks (benefit can’t be compensation)
Any compensation (only applies for research)
How to withdraw
Also need to tell them what is not known if applicable
Need capacity to have informed consent
But legal guardians can consent on their behalf
If they have some capacity, their opinions are considered
How is informed consent gathered?
Written document with signature
Verbal
Only for low-risk situations
Can be documented
Assent- agreement to participate by someone under 18 because they can’t legally consent
Informed consent still needs to be given by guardians
But assent is important because it acknowledges adolescents’ ability to make decisions
Emergency situations where patient is unable to give informed consent
Use surrogate
If no surrogate- medical team makes best judgment abt what patient would want
Assumption is usually made that they would want all treatment
Differs across contexts
Eastern cultures may emphasize “family informed consent”
Low literacy areas = inability to document consent
Consider language fluency of people reading documents
Overall purpose of informed consent
Protection of human rights
Educates patient’s/participants about what they’re agreeing to
Communication between clinicians/researchers & patients/participants
Shared decision making- collaborative process of determining course of care between patients and clinicians
Patient needs capacity to participate
Honors autonomy
Resists paternalism
Clinicians educate patients on
Available treatment options
Pros and cons of those options
Clinician retains right to refuse to provide the treatment patient is requesting based on
If they don’t believe treatment will be beneficial/effective
They aren’t trained to provide this treatment (out of scope of practice)
They have moral objections to providing this treatment
Limits to this- can’t deny care to someone based on race, gender, sexual orientation
Barriers to shared decision making
Time- clinicians have little time w/ patients, not all options can be discussed
Expertise- clinician may not know abt every possibility/new options
Rapport- patients may not trust clinicians to help them make decisions
Patient may prefer paternalistic approach
Some patients may not have educational background to help them understand info
Language barriers between patient and provider
Clinician may not fully understand patient’s values