**Legal**
* While they open the possibility for more people to use them, who one does deny the right to use them
* Ensure privacy and data security and if one is breaking the law, whether the police should be allowed to hack it or not
* The massive amounts of data required to operate them have raised issues about whether individuals are identifiable, who has access to this data, and what can be done with it and how long it can be stored
* Cyber security concerns
* Liability in accidents
**Ethical**
* When they become used so prevalently and can safely and easily replace non-autonomous driving, should non-autonomous vehicles be banned for safety reasons
* The vehicle’s decision-making in unavoidable crash situations may make them crash into children or light vehicles, instead of other cars, walls, or lampposts to save the driver’s life
* If algorithms target those less at risk, then people may start to take unsafe activities in order to become safe
* Moral algorithms don’t work because questionnaires meant to identify driving behaviour have been shown to be inaccurate because people feel pressured to give more altruistic answers, rather than honest responses
* We lose the choice and ability to make our own decisions in the car’s navigation
* They are threatening our free will and moral responsibility, because of an overreliance on algorithms and AI
* Now that cars can retrieve a wide array of driving habits, patterns, and behaviours, if insurance companies gain access to this information, insurance could be tailored to meet individuals’ driving performance