1/30
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
What are the major motives for firms wanting to grow
increase profits- more markets= more sales= more money
lower costs- bigger scale = better deals on materials, tech, etc.
reduce risk- diverse markets/products = not having all your eggs in one basket
motivate management- growth gives more power and prestige
survive competition- big firms can better defend market share
markets vs. firms
markets (buy)
use contracts, suppliers, external vendors
good for flexibility, low cost
risk: less control, coordination issues
firms (make)
do all internally (in-house)
good for quality control
risk: higher cost, bureaucracy
make-or-buy continuum
you can fully make, fully buy, or do something in between (alliances, licensing)
what is corporate strategy
it’s about what businesses a firm should compete in
3 dimensions:
vertical integration (owning parts of a supply chain)
diversification (spreading new products into new markets)
geographic scope (what countries, regions to operate in)
vertical integration
backward = you take over the earlier steps (ex: buying your supplier)
forward = you take over later steps (ex: opening your own store)
benefits: more control, save money long term, protect tech/ secrets
risks: expensive, less flexibility, hard to reverse
alternatives: strategic alliances, contracts, outsourcing
corporate diversification types
single business (just one thing)
dominant business (mostly one, some of another)
related diversification (new areas that share tech/customers)
unrelated diversification (totally different industries)
core competence market matrix
helps decide if diversification makes sense based on what you’re already good at and where you sell
build, borrow, or buy framework
use when deciding how to grow:
build = develop it yourself (takes time, control)
borrow = partner with someone (faster, shared risk)
buy = acquire company (fast, costly)
why strategic alliances matter
let firms grow without buying or building
why firms do them:
share resources
enter new markets
lower costs and risks
merger vs acquisitions
merger = two comanies combine as equals
acquisition = one company buys another
why use them?
enter markets quickly
gain tech or talent
eliminate a competitor
horizontal integration
buying/ merging with a competitor
pros: scale, eliminate rivals
cons: antitrust issues, culture clashes, overpaying
why companies go global
pros: more customers, lower costs, access talent/ resources
cons: distance, cultural/ language barriers, political risk
CAGE distance framework
use it to decide which countries to enter
cultural (language, values)
administrative (laws, policies)
geographic (distance, infrastructure)
economic (wealth, income levels)
integration-responsiveness framework
4 strategies for MNE’s
global standardization (same everywhere)
localization (adapt to each market)
transnational (mix of both)
international (just export the same product)
Porters 5 forces
explains why some countries dominate in certain industries
factor conditions (talent/ resources)
demand conditions (home market size/ sophistication)
related/ supporting industries
firm strategy, structure, rivalry
organizational design
the way a company sets up people, systems, culture, and processes to carry out strategy
key types of structure
simple: one boss, reports to them (startups)
functional: people grouped by job type (marketing, sales)
multidivisional (M-form): divisions by product or geography
Matrix: Mix of functional + divisional (complex but flexible)
culture
Layers: Artifacts (visible stuff), values, assumptions (deep beliefs)
comes from: founders, leaders, company history
Control
input controls = rules, procedures, training
output controls = set goals, measure results
used to guide behavior & performance to match strategy
shared value creation
strategy that creates both economic value and social value
do good + do well (e.g., sustainable practices, ethical sourcing)
corporate governance
set of rules/ processes to make sure managers act in shareholders’ best interest
Tools: Board of directors, audits, incentive plans
Agency theory
problem: managers (agents) may not act in interest of owners (principals)
fix it with governance mechanisms (e.g., bonuses, oversight)
business ethics & strategy
ethical level = legal, responsible, and morally right
helps build trust, brand, and long-term success
fully make
fully internal production
licensing
you let someone else use your tech/brand for a fee
franchising
they use your brand/model, but you don’t do the operations
joint venture
you and another firm split ownership and share resources
strategic alliances
you work closely together, but stay separate companies
long term contracts
you commit to buying from a supplier for a long period
spot market (fully buy)
you just buy from whoever has the best offer at the time