 Call Kai
Call Kai Learn
Learn Practice Test
Practice Test Spaced Repetition
Spaced Repetition Match
Match1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
| Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | 
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Van Gend en Loos
individuals can invoke EU law in national court (direct effect)
Costa v. ENEL
Supremacy of EU law (effectiveness)
Simmenthal II
National courts must disapply national law that conflicts with EU law
National courts= decentralized EU court
Principle of loyalty
art 4(3) TEU
MS must ensure full effect of EU law
Principle of loyalty application
Supremacy
Direct effect
Indirect effect
State liability
Grad
Decision- Direct effect
Munoz
Regulation- Direct effect
Van Gend en Loos/ Walrave
Treaty= Direct effect
Marshall
Directive- Only vertical direct effect
Indirect effect
Consistent interpretation
National courts must interpret national law in line with directives
Limits of Indirect effect
Only after implementation deadline (Adeneler)
Cannot create/ aggravate criminal liability (Kolpinghuis)
Fundamental Rights
have direct effect if clear and unconditional
Dansk Industri
art 21 CFR has horizontal direct effect
State liability
Brasserie de Pecher
Sufficiently serious breach
Breached rule must confer individual rights
Causal link between breach and damage
Relationship with direct and indirect effect
First try indirect effect. if not possible, then…
Direct effect (only in vertical disputes)