etymological definiton of philosophy? (by pythagoras)
philo: love
sophia: wisdom
karl marx in his theses on feuerbach highlights two important activities in Philosophy
The Philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it
What is the main content that we talk about in Philosophy?
Big questions, Philosophical problems
What methodology do we pursue in Philosophy?
Conceptual analysis, Rational justification
branch of Philosophy: What is real? What exists? What is time? Space?
-the study of the most basic items or features of reality or the study of the most basic concept used in an account of reality.
Metaphysics
branch of Philosophy: 'What is knowledge? What is the nature, source of knowledge?'
-the inquiry into the nature, sources and validity of knowledge.
Epistemology
Episteme (greek)
knowledge
branch of Philosophy: , 'What is beauty?
What is art?'
-the nature, perception and evaluation of art and beauty.
Aesthetics
Aisthesis (greek)
(sensation/perception)
branch of Philosophy
-the study of the methods and principles used to distinguish good (correct) from bad (incorrect) reasoning.
Logic
Anthony Kenny: Philosophy permeates all fields of knowledge & thinking as clearly as possible about the most fundamental concepts
Philosophy of X
branch of Philosophy: 'What is good? What is right?
-the systematization, defense and recommendation of concepts of right and wrong behavior
Ethics
According to Andresito Acuna in the Philosophical Analysis, what are the Fundamental elements of Ethics?
-a definition of good
-what is right in terms of good
-a statement of the moral principle in clear and uncertain terms
category of ethics: 'What do these judgments mean? What does "right" mean?
-the study of the basic ethical concepts and principles that aid in the discussion of Ethics
Metaethics
category of Ethics: 'How should we act?'
-the study of various Ethical Frameworks or Theories that aim to guide our conduct.
Normative/Prescriptive Ethics
category of Ethics: 'How do we practice it?'
-concerned with the practical questions about what is moral; deals with controversial moral problems such as abortion, pre- marital sex, capital punishment, euthanasia, civil disobedience, race, LGBTQ++, etc.
Applied/Practical Ethics
Feature of moral principles: must be practical, or action-guiding (this is the nature of morality. This feature involves commands.
Prescriptivity
Feature of moral principles: a moral principle could applied to all evaluative judgments.
Universalizability
Feature of moral principles: moral principles have predominant authority and override other kinds of principles
Overridingness
Feature of moral principles: moral principles must be made public in order to guide our actions.
Publicity
Feature of moral principles: must be workable and its rules must not lay a heavy burden on us when we follow them.
Practicability
an act that is permissible for you to do. It may be either (a) obligatory or (b) optional.
Right acts
an act you ought not to do; it is not permissible to do it.
Wrong acts
morality requires you to do; it is not permissible for you to refrain from doing it.
obligatory act
neither obligatory nor wrong to do. It is not your duty to do it, nor is it your duty not to do it. Neither doing it nor not doing it would be wrong.
optional act
domains of ethical assessments
action, consequences, character, motivation
branches of philosophy
aesthetics, epistemology, ethics, logic, metaphysics, others (philosophy of X)
categories of ethics
metaethics, normative (prescriptive) ethics, applied (practical) ethics, descriptive ethics *not learnt
features of moral principles
prescriptivity, universalizability, overridingness, publicity, practicability
domain of ethical assessment
-If these are on balance positive, then the action is right, if negative, then wrong.
consequences
good character traits
virtues
bad character traits
vices
domain of ethical assessment
-For a full assessment of any action, it is important to take this into account. Two acts may appear identical on the surface, but one may be judged morally blameworthy and the other excusable.
motivation
branches of metaethics
cognitivist, non-cognitivist
norma (greek)
right (right-angle ruler or square)
models of reasoning (2)
deductive model & reflective equilibrium
evaluating an example of human conduct based on a general rule (ethical framework/theory) that dictates what should be considered ethical
deductive model
evaluating an example of human conduct based the person's moral judgments their principles
(if you believe something is ethical then it is)
reflective equilibrium
when someone makes a moral claim they are
expressing a belief.
moral claims can be true or false; this
is part of cognitivism because beliefs
are the sort of thing that can be true
or false.
cognitivism
if a person makes a moral claim they are
expressing a non-belief state such as
an emotion. Expressions of approval
or disapproval (emotion) are not the
sort of things that can be true or false
non-cognitivism
branch of non-cognitivism
-Moral claims are not claims about reality but are personal prescriptions
prescriptivity
branch of non-cognitivism
-Moral judgements are not claims about reality, but are emotional expressions of the speaker.
emotivism
branch of cognitivism
-when someone makes moral claim, they are expressing a
belief they have about reality. Moral judgements express beliefs about something relative and are not
objective or universally true.
moral relativism
branch of cognitivism
-Moral values are true regardless of what the
individual thinks
moral realism
sub-branch of cognitivism
-This is a theory in Metaethics claims that the only things that exist are those things that would appear in the scientific picture of what exists. They say that moral properties are part of the natural world and can be reduced to natural and nonethical properties (for example, moral goodness to well-being, moral badness to pain).
Naturalism (under moral realism)
sub-branch of cognitivism
-theory in Metaethics thinks that there are some things that exist that could not show up on the scientific picture of what exists. Moral properties cannot be reduced to non-ethical parts. Moral values are real and independent of nature. Moral values merely describe actions in nature as either good or bad.
Non-naturalism (under moral realism)
This theory in Metaethics states that there are objective universal moral principles, valid for all people and all social environments.
moral objectivism
This theory in Metaethics states that there are non-overrideable moral principles that one
ought never violate. Moral principles are exceptionless.
moral absolutism
The Natural Law Theory
The Doctrine of Double Effect
Thomas Aquinas' Doctrines
Thomas Aquinas proposed this theory which claims that there exists an eternal moral law that can be discovered through reason by looking at the nature of humanity and society. This is a moral theory that is based on the belief in an objective moral order inherent in nature
TLDR: humans are born with a certain moral compass that guides behaviors
The Natural Law Theory
Thomas Aquinas proposed a doctrine that is used to assess the morality of an action that has both good and bad consequences. It provides a framework for determining whether an act that produces both desirable and undesirable outcomes is morally permissible.
TLDR: in pursuing the good it is sometimes morally permissible to bring about some evil as a side-effect or merely foreseen consequence
Doctrine of Double Effect (DoDE)
-Human beings have an essential rational nature established by God, who designed us to live and flourish in prescribed ways
-Even without knowledge of God, reason, as the essence of our nature, can discover the laws necessary for human flourishing
-The natural laws are universal and unchangeable, and one should use them to judge individual societies and their positive laws.
key ideas of the natural law tradition
conditions for morally permissible acts (according to the DoDE)
The nature-of-the-act condition
The means-end condition
The right-intention condition
The proportionality condition
The action must be either morally good or indifferent (ex. Lying or intentionally killing an innocent person is never permissible).
The nature-of-the-act condition
The intention must be the achieving of only the good effect, with the bad effect being only an unintended side effect. If the bad effect is a means of obtaining the good effect, then the act is immoral. The bad effect may be foreseen but must not be intended.
The right-intention condition
The bad effect must not be the means by which one achieves the good effect.
The means-end condition
The good effect must be at least equivalent in importance to the bad effect.
The proportionality condition
There are universal and objective moral principles, valid for all people and social environments. (??? same as moral)
moderate objectivism