1/39
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
What is law
a series of rules whose purpose is to create and maintain peace and harmony throughout all levels and relationships in society
governs relationships between individuals, corporations, and countries
a lawless society is not possible. conflicts invariably occur and need for rules arise
appeal
when higher courts are asked to review a decision of lower court
appellant
person seeking an appeal
an appeal can be heard of it is determined that the trial judge may have made an error
the person who appeals must show that the judges interpretation if the law or the facts are wrong
Stare Decisis
“to stand by things decided” is a legal principle that directs courts to adhere to previous judgements - or judgements of higher or tribunals - as it has persuasive and binding authority while resolving a case with allegedly comparable facts
why is stare decisis important
it fosters predictable, unbiased, and consistent development of legal principles, so the notion of stare decisis is favored in judicial systems. it also increases reliance on judicial decisions and adds to the actual perceived integrity of the judicial process
INTEGRITY, STABILITY, PREDICATBILY
NOT ABSOLUTE
Time for a case to be tried in front of a judge
superior court case → up to 30 months to be completed
provincials court case → up to 18 months to be completed
anything over → “presumptively unreasonable” and an automatic violation of the charter right
natural law
focuses on a higher order than human authority, such as god(s), the natural world, or morality (punishments for action are based in the situation that the person was in)
positive law
the law is that the lawmakers say it is. law is based on human authority (must be followed no matter what)
legal realism
often called “law in action”. laws are derived from current social interest and public policy, often heavily influenced by politics
Socrates (470-399 BCE) - Natural Law
credited as one of the founders of western philosophy, and as being the first moral philosopher
believed that natural law must be obeyed in order to have a functioning society
laws are always just and therefore must be upheld at any cost
believed in his theories so much that he accepted his punishment
Plato (427-378 BCE) - Natural Law
was a Greek Philosopher and was a student of Socrates, teacher of Aristotle and felt that human reason/common sense should prevail in matters of natural law
perfect leaders (law makers) do not exist, so laws must be put in place to serve as a check on their tendency to become corrupt
man should not obey corrupt natural law
Aristotle (348-322 BCE) - Natural Law
was a student of Plato, however developed quite different political beliefs on justice in society
introduced the concept of Equity into society, equal is not always fair
example: if a child steals a loaf of bread
in Plato’s society, the child’s hand will be cut off
in his society, the child will be excused for their offence
St. Augustine (354-430 AD) - Natural Law
human law must confirm to divine law
believed:
natural law should be obeyed before man’s law
the church should not be separate from the state
Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) - Natural Law
Humans had ‘natural inclinations’
Preserving life
Avoiding offending others
Educating your children
Knowing the truth about God
The church is guardian of the government and law
Corrupt kings should not be obeyed
Laws should support the common God
There is a duty to support the poor
Canon law is evident in some areas of contemporary law
Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) - Positive Law
ABSOLUTISM
Wrote his theories down in a book called “the leviathan”
Question: how can humans live together in peace and avoid the danger and fear of civil conflict
Answer: a strong ruler is needed to prevent us from our natural state of being (to make us behave and not kill each other)
Laws must regulate people's interactions with each other
Justice and morality depend on obeying the law
argues that the only way to escape a “state of nature” (state of war) is to develop a social contract
Citizens must come together in peace, agreeing to a set of laws, and creating a “sovereign”
This is known as absolutism: one ruler must have absolute power over the people
John Locke (1632-1704) - positive law
believed that all people were given natural rights. These are the rights God gave Adam upon creation
There are 3 main natural rights: “life, liberty and property”
wrote this down in his book: “the treatises of government”
believed that to defend these natural rights, we need a good government (constitutional government!)
The constitution is _____ version of a social contract
If the government failed to protect the people, they have the right to revolution
Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778) - positive law
claimed that everyone was born free and equal
Societies imposed a sense of ownership over resources and divisions of labor, which they caused conflict and social injustice
“The social contract”: people should follow the laws of the state, as they recognized the benefits of doing so
The state should govern according to the general will of the people and should not fear their government.
Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) - Positive Law
Believed in utilitarianism - “the greatest good for the greatest number of people” (common good)
The legal system should be designed to prevent harm to people and create participating members of society
First legal philosopher to introduce the idea of reform instead of punishment
concepts of legal realism
Judicial decisions: judges don’t just apply the law. Their decisions are often influenced by personal views, societal values, and the specific circumstances of the case
Law in action: how laws are actually applied in real life situations, not just how they are written in law books
Social impact: social consequences of legal decisions. Laws are legal outcomes should be evaluated by how they impact society, not just by legal principles
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr (1841-1935)
Considered one of the founders of legal realism. He famously stated “the life of the law has not been logic, it has been experience”
This reflects the idea that law evolves based on societal needs and is shaped by human experience, rather than just logical deduction from legal principles
Karl Llewellyn (1893-1962)
A leading legal realists in the united states and one of the most prominent theories of the movement
Critics that legal rules are often ambiguous and emphasised the role of judges in shaping the law based on their understanding of social needs and real world consequences
Coined the term “law in action” to describe how laws are applied and enforced in the real world, as opposed to how they are written on paper (“law in books”)
Jerome Frank (1889-1957)
Believed that legal uncertainty is inevitable and that judges’ personal experiences and biases play a major role in their decisions
Judicial objectivity often obscured the fact that legal outcomes are shaped by subjective factors
This is why you can appeal a judges decisions bc biases can occur
emphasis that law should be understood as flexible and evolving tool shaped by human psychology and the circumstances of the individual
criminology
crimen (crime) + logos (doctrine)
The study of the nature, causes, and means of dealing with crime
Theories of criminal behavior have always been linked to the underlying beliefs and priorities es of society
In early society criminal behaviour was often attributed to an evil influence, or possession of the individual by the devil
trial by ordeal
used during medieval times
a practice by which the guilt or innocence of the accused was determined by subjecting them to painful, or at least an unpleasant, usually dangerous experience
It was believed that if the individual was innocent, god would protect them against these strange and painful procedures
There are three types: fire, water, or combat
Cesare Beccaria: classical criminology
Summarized his theory in his book “on crimes and punishment”
His theories emphasized that crime is a rational choice made by individuals based on a cost benefit analysis
People are motivated by self-interest (not evil influence), so they commit crimes when the benefits outweigh the consequences
He argued for a legal system where punishments deter crime
His work laid the foundation for modern criminal justice reform, advocating for fair laws and against harsh, arbitrary punishments.
Jeremey Bentham: Utilitarianism
Theory is based on the idea that human behaviour is guided by the pursuit of pleasure and the avoidance of pain
Crime occurs when individuals believe the benefits of committing the crime outweigh the consequences
Laws and punishments should be designed to maximize societal happiness by deterring criminal behavior. Punishment should only used when it prevents greater harm and should be proportionate to crime to maintain a balance between deterrence and justice
His ideas helped shape the concept of deterrence in criminal justice
Cesare Lombroso: biological and psychological theories
As the fields of science evolved, individuals in the 1900s started looking for biological and psychological reasons for criminal behaviour
Founded the “positists” school, arguing that some people were “born criminals” (also called “anthropological criminology”)
believed that criminals were physically different than non-criminals
Certain physical features of “congenital defects” indicated lack of evolution and resulted in savage behaviour
Sloping forehead, large ears, pronounced jaws, long arms
His work marked a shift from viewing crime as a rational choice to seeing it as a product of biological and psychological factors, through his theories have been largely discredited today
No hope for rehabilitation
Sigmund Freud - psychoanalytic theory
believed that criminal behavior was caused by mental illness or a weak conscience
He suggested that criminal behavior arises from an imbalance between three parts of the psyche: the ID (instinctual desires), the ego (rational thought), and the superego (moral conscience)
If the id’s impulses are too strong or if the superego fails to develop properly, individuals may act out in antisocial ways, including committing crimes
believed that unresolved psychological conflicts, often stemming from childhood, could manifest as deviant behaviour later in life
Criminals (and others with mental illness) could be treated through “psychoanalysis”. A specific method of dealing with “repressed” or unconscious memories
Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels: conflict theory
the communist manifesto, 1848
They argued that criminal behaviour was linked to social and economic inequalities in societies
According to this theory, laws and the criminal justice system are tools used by the ruling class to maintain power and control over the working class
Crime arises when individuals, particularly from disadvantaged groups, react to the oppression and exploitation they experience
The theory argues that what is defined as “criminal” often reflects the interests of the powerful, rather than a universal sense of right and wrong
Emile Durkheim: Social Structure Theory (1858-1917)
He argued that crime rates in cities was due to the loss of traditional values and bonds as people moved from small communities and towns to big cities
Being isolated and anonymous in large cities caused a disconnection with society, and a feeling that the individual was not playing a meaningful role
This theory was later combined with the strain theory
The Strain Theory
Based on the theory that the emphasis on wealth and power has created a situation that those without a quality education or access to good jobs are willing to break the law in order to achieve their goals
Traditional media and social media “advertise” the lifestyles of the rich and famous, putting pressure on individuals to attain the same level of comforts
The strain exists between societal expectations with limited opportunities which leads to criminal behaviour to achieve their goals
Contemporary biological and neurophysiological theories
As scientists learn more about the body and brain functioning, and the impact of diet and drugs, they are recognizing that some conditions can influence criminal behaviour
Biological trait theories:
Biological or congenital traits, as well as chemical imbalances in the body can cause a predisposition to criminal behavior
Examples include fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS), genetic traits, hormone or chemical imbalances caused by diet, drug use, or genetic factors
Neurophysiological theories:
Brain monitoring and imaging has enabled doctors and scientists to recognize certain abnormal brain development or functioning
It suggests that abnormalities in in the prefrontal cortex (responsible for decision-making and impulse control), can impair a person;s ability to regulate emotions and behaviour, leading to increased aggression or poor decision making
Factors like brain injuries, and hormonal imbalances are explored in this theory as potential contributors to deviant or criminal actions
Fundamental Principles of Justice
Rule of law
Impartiality
Equality
Fairness
The right to be presumed innocent
Rule of Law
Individuals must recognize and accept that law is necessary to regulate society
The law applies equally to everyone, including people in power such as heads of state, police officers, judges, politicians
No one in our society has the authority to exercise unrestricted power to take away our rights except in accordance with the law
Impartiality
A decision in a court of law should be based on objective criteria. Bias prejudices should not play a role in a trail
Judges must demonstrate respect for all people involved in a case and must demonstrate respect for the law in their personal lives.
Equality
the principle that states that government and individuals are subject to the same laws and that all are entitled to equal protection of the law
Fairness
Fairness in law refers to the process or procedure within the judicial system. A person should know the evidence the crown intends to presents
Accused should be able to understand court proceedings in order to go to trial
The idea of fairness also means that bias or prejudice should not play a role in the creation of laws, the arrest procedures or the court processes
Innocent Until Proven Guilty
One of the most important principles of justice is that all people accused of breaking a law are considered innocent until they have been proven guilty in a court of law. This is sometimes called the ‘presumption of innocence’.
Division of Law
Public Law
Federal and Provincial laws; Criminal Code of Canada
types: administrative, criminal, constitutional
basis of decision: “guilty beyond a reasonable doubt”
case title: R v. Last name
Private Law
municipalities: small claims court
types: family, contract, tort, property, employment
basis of decision: “on the balance of probabilities”
case title: last name v last name
Jurisprudence
the study, knowledge, or science of law
significance: clarifies legal principles, guides development, ensures justice, connects law with morality, shapes legal systems, and influences judicial decisions.