Empirical Methods in Finance Flashcards

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/56

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcards covering key vocabulary and concepts from the Empirical Methods in Finance lectures.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

57 Terms

1
New cards

Asset Returns

The change in the value of an asset over a period.

2
New cards

High Frequency Data

Intraday frequency, for instance, tick-by-tick, 5 minute, 15 minute, 1 hour intervals.

3
New cards

Low Frequency Data

Typically, daily, monthly, quarterly, annual frequencies

4
New cards

Opening Price

Price at which a security first trades upon the opening of an exchange on a trading day.

5
New cards

Closing Price

Price at which a security is traded on a given trading day, representing the most up-to-date valuation of a security.

6
New cards

Adjusted Closing Price

Price adjusted for corporate actions (splits, dividend payments, etc.).

7
New cards

Simple Return Formula

𝑅{t+1} = (𝑃{t+1} − 𝑃t) / 𝑃t

8
New cards

Log Return Formula

𝑟{t+1} = log(𝑃{t+1} / 𝑃t) = 𝑝{t+1} − 𝑝_t

9
New cards

k-period simple return Formula

Rt[k] = (Pt+k − Pt) / Pt

10
New cards

Total Return Index

Includes dividend payments

11
New cards

Price Index

Computed without dividend payments.

12
New cards

Excess Return

The difference between the asset return and the return on the risk-free asset.

13
New cards

Unconditional Volatility estimator

Estimated as the sample standard deviation.

14
New cards

absence of autocorrelations

(linear) autocorrelations of asset returns are often insignificant, except for very small intraday time scales (~ 20 minutes) (microstructure effects)

15
New cards

Heavy tails

the (unconditional) distribution of returns seems to display a power-law or Pareto-like tail, with a tail index which is finite, higher than two

16
New cards

Gain/loss asymmetry

one observes large drawdowns in stock prices and stock index values but not equally large upward movements.

17
New cards

Aggregational Normality

as one increases the time scale over which returns are calculated, their distribution looks more and more like a normal distribution. The shape of the distribution is not the same at different time scales

18
New cards

Intermittency

returns display, at any time scale, a high degree of variability. This is quantified by the presence of irregular bursts in time series of a wide variety of volatility estimators.

19
New cards

Volatility clustering

different measures of volatility display a positive autocorrelation over several days, which quantifies the fact that high-volatility events tend to cluster in time.

20
New cards

Conditional heavy tails

even after correcting returns for volatility clustering (e.g. via GARCH-type models), the residual time series still exhibit heavy tails. However, the tails are less heavy than in the unconditional distribution of returns.

21
New cards

Slow decay of autocorrelation in absolute returns

the autocorrelation function of absolute returns decays slowly as a function of the time lag, roughly as a power law. This is sometimes interpreted as a sign of long-range dependence.

22
New cards

Leverage effect

most measures of volatility of an asset are negatively correlated with the returns of that asset.

23
New cards

Volume/volatility correlation

trading volume is correlated with volatility.

24
New cards

Asymmetry in time scales

coarse-grained measures of volatility predict fine-scale volatility better than the other way round.

25
New cards

Normality of log-returns

It is a convenient assumption for many applications in Finance (cf. Black-Scholes model for option pricing). For stock-index returns, it is consistent with the Central Limit Theorem if log-returns are i.i.d.

26
New cards

Time independency (i.i.d., or independent and identically distributed, process)

It is, to some extent, an implication of the Efficient Market Hypothesis. In fact, the EMH only imposes unpredictability of returns.

27
New cards

Weak Stationarity

Most return sequences can be modeled as a stochastic process with (at least) time- invariant two first moments

28
New cards

Autocorrelation

The autocorrelations of asset returns 𝑅! are often insignificant, except for very small intraday time scales (≈ 20 minutes) for which microstructure effects come into play.

29
New cards

Correlogram

A plot of the sample autocorrelations.

30
New cards

Volatility Clustering

Large price changes tend to be followed by large price changes, and periods of tranquility alternate with periods of high volatility.

31
New cards

Volatility Asymmetry

Volatility is more affected by negative news than positive news.

32
New cards

Cross-Correlation

A measure of the dependence between two series.

33
New cards

Skewness

Measures the asymmetry of the distribution

34
New cards

Kurtosis

Measures tail-fatness of distribution

35
New cards

Jarque-Bera Test

A test based on the fact that under normality, skewness and excess kurtosis are jointly equal to zero.

36
New cards

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

Compares the empirical cdf and the assumed theoretical cdf.

37
New cards

Lilliefors Test

Variant of KS test where mean and variance are estimated from the data.

38
New cards

Strict Stationarity

The joint distribution of (𝑟{t1}, … , 𝑟{tk}) is identical to that of (𝑟{t1+h}, … , 𝑟{tk+h}) for all t and h.

39
New cards

Weak Stationarity (Covariance Stationarity)

The mean of 𝑟t and the covariance between 𝑟t and 𝑟_{t−k} are time-invariant.

40
New cards

White Noise

A time series process that is i.i.d. with a zero mean, a constant variance, and no autocorrelation.

41
New cards

Autocorrelation Function (ACF)

A measure of the serial correlation between 𝑟_t and its lagged values.

42
New cards

Linear Time Series

A time series that can be written as a linear combination of a sequence of uncorrelated random variables.

43
New cards

Partial Autocorrelation Function (PACF)

Measures the additional correlation between 𝑟t and 𝑟{t−k} after adjusting for the correlation with intervening lags.

44
New cards

Moving Average (MA) Process

A process where the current value depends on current and past error terms.

45
New cards

Autoregressive Moving Average (ARMA) Process

A mixed process that combines autoregressive (AR) and moving average (MA) components.

46
New cards

Akaike Information Criterion (AIC)

A criterion for model selection that balances model fit and complexity.

47
New cards

Schwarz (Bayesian) Information Criterion (BIC)

Similar to AIC but with a stronger penalty for model complexity.

48
New cards

Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE)

A method to estimate the parameters of a model by maximizing the likelihood function.

49
New cards

Vector Autoregressive (VAR) Model

A multivariate time series model that captures the interdependencies among multiple series.

50
New cards

Cross-Correlation Matrices

Describe the lead-lag relationship between multiple time series.

51
New cards

Granger Causality

A statistical concept that tests whether one time series is useful in forecasting another.

52
New cards

Impulse Response Analysis

Examines the response of a system to shocks or innovations. Used to analyze how a system reacts to sudden changes.

53
New cards

Variance Decomposition

Determines the proportion of the variance in one variable that can be explained by other variables in a system. Helps in understanding the relative importance of different factors.

54
New cards

Vector Moving-Average (VMA) Model

An extension of the moving-average model to multiple time series. Useful for capturing relationships based on how past errors affect current variables.

55
New cards

Weak Stationarity and Cross-Correlation Matrices

A n-dimensional time series is weakly stationary if its mean vector and covariance matrix are time invariant

56
New cards

Test for Granger Causality

Granger causality is defined in terms of linear predictions

57
New cards

Test for Granger Causality

If does not Granger cause i.i.f. the best linear prediction of given and does not depend on