1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
FDR’s Good Neighbor Policy: applications and effects
An attempt to distance the US from the interventionist policies of the early 20th Century
A policy put in place to ensure mutual, friendly relations between the U.S. and Latin American nations
This was one strategy to unify the Western Hemisphere to make the U.S. stronger in world affairs: trade, conflict, etc…
This was also done to alleviate the regional effects of the Great Depression
Envisioned is a reciprocal relationship between the U.S. and Latin American nations - good relations will lead to mutually beneficial trade - everybody wins (in theory…)!
U.S. withdraws military from all over the hemisphere (Nicaragua, etc…)
The Platt Amendment is nullified - Cuba is actually independent for the first time, well, ever.
Impacts: terminated the Marines’ occupation of Nicaragua (1933) and Haiti (1934)
Effects: US policy is supported by much of Latin America in the build up to WWII
Policy lasts until 1945 when Cold War strategy makes it impossible to follow
Co-Op during the war
Major coordination of trade and diplomacy with most of Latin America
Economy, military, approaches to the Canal
McCollum Memo - October 1940
Basically said that they want to go to war but the American Public will not support that
Therefore we must goad Japan into doing the first act of war (things like freezing assets)
Pearl Harbor happens (did we know…)
US “Neutrality Acts” of 1935(restrictive), 1936(more restrictive), 1937(even more restrictive),”Cash and Carry in 1939, “Lend-Lease” in 1941
Nye Committee (1934) - scathing indictment of US involvement in WWI
Munitions companies are ‘bribing’ other countries in order to sell weapons and maintain huge profits
These companies are scaring countries into purchasing vast weapons systems and then going to neighboring countries and doing the same
The committee accuses munitions companies of using their vast profits to unethically influence governments - especially the U.S. government
American First Committee (Lindbergh spokesperson) - to pressure FDR to not take sides (Nazi sympathizers…)
Charles Lindbergh and the America First Committee
1939: Countries of the Americas should stay out of European conflicts - and if one does, the U.S. should stay out
Advocates neutrality but not through pacifism - we must be prepare for war and support the defense of our allies (Advocated selling defensive weapons to our allies)
Criticizes Wilson for WWI - claiming Europe and the U.S. are not tied politically, but are tied racially: we shouldn’t fight any Europeans b/c it weakens the white race
Denounced loans to any warring nations, which had recently changed
Montevideo Agreement 1933 - FDR: “No state has the right to intervene in the internal or external affairs of another”
Defines what a State is, declares that only states that sign the agreement are recognized, defines what states rights are
The U.S. adds “reservations” that essentially say that intervention might still happen b/c we haven’t agreed on definitions for everything
Havana Act of 1940: Any attack against an American Republic, is considered an attack against all 21 American Republics
Declaration of Panama 1939: Conference where all 21 American Republics agreed on a Pan-American Security zone that reached out about 1000 nautical miles offshore. Zone was regulated by US ships
Joint cooperation with US and Canada to form the Permanent Joint Board on Defence that is responsible for the security of their continent
Buenos Aires Agreement 1936 - what to do in the event of a ‘non-hemispheric aggressor’ - co-op treaty
Organizes potential response to a “non-hemispheric aggressor”
U.S. does not attach reservations as they did at Montevideo
Simply says that IF this happens, signatory nations agree to coordinate a response
Mexico 1938: nationalized its oil industry - kicks US companies out, seize property - GNP applies - Mexico agrees to pay $20 mil in compensation (good neighbor policy kept us out of war in this situation, a good example of success)
Mexico nationalized their oil industry, meaning the government took control of production - no private company can make a profit off oil
100s of U.S. citizens are kicked out, and companies like Shell Oil, who are heavily invested, appeal to the USFG
U.S. oil companies want $200M in compensation
Mexico refuses U.S. demands, citing non-intervention principle
FDR negotiates a settlement - Mexico will eventually pay $30M in 1943 in compensation to U.S. oil companies