1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Ethical issues
What would be considered right and wrong by society
Legal issues
What’s actually right and wrong by law
Environmental issues
What the impacts would be on the natural worls
Legislation
Data Protection Act 2018
Computer Misuse Act 1990
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988
Data Protection Act 2018
Data must be…
Fairly and lawfully processed
Used for specific purposes only
Adequate, relevant and not excessive
Accurate and up-to-date
Not to be kept longer than necessary
Kept secure
Computer Misuse Act 1990
States that these are illegal:
Unauthorised access to computer material
Unauthorised access with intent to commit or facilitate a crime
Unauthorised modification of computer material
Make, supply or obtain anything which can be used in computer misuse offences (e.g. production and distribution of malware)
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988
Designed to protect the works of companies and individuals from being illegally used, copied or distributed.
(“Works“ include books, music, images, video and software)
Privacy
Citizens value their privacy and may not like it when governments/security services have too much access.
However can governments/security services keep their citizens safe from terrorism and other attacks if they don’t have access to private data?
Cyber security and hacking
Encryption is used to secure data but cyber criminals also use it to protect their data from governments and law enforcement agencies. So should security services have access to everyone’s encrypted data in order to protect the majority from the few? - Privacy vs crime prevention.
Increased communication technologies means more sensitive information is sent electronically - people need to be careful.
Mobile technologies
E.g. smartphones and laptops
They switch through one network to another as they roam through various regions - an unprotected network connection can allow a hacker to intercept data like passwords or bank details.
Phishing scams happen a lot through SMS messaging as well as standard email.
Police have access to mobile cell data and can thus track its movement - no privacy however it is commonly used in crime intervention and as evidence in legal cases.
Wireless networking
Could be eavesdroppers in an unsecured network, looking to capitalise on any sensitive data that may be sent.
Cloud storage
Cloud storage = remote storage accessible via the internet.
Increased security risks as more data is shared over a connection.
High bandwidth required to access data and is not universally available
Fewer cars polluting the road as people can work from home rather than having to travel
Can be accessed from anywhere in the world with an internet connection
Easier to share data with others
Backup is arranged by the cloud storage provider
Wearable technologies
E.g. heart rate monitors, health trackers, smart watches and smart glasses/visors
Costs of health insurance or health bills may decrease if health is monitored - widens the divide between those who can afford and cannot afford digital technology
Has to be accurate in recording health etc - could lead to blame?
When monitoring, screen time on mobiles increases, reducing time spent with family
Computer based implants
E.g. microchips inserted under the skin, cochlear implants and pacemakers.
Chips could bring health advantages - e.g. monitor and alert a wearer to a current risk of a heart attack or a farm could track livestock movements.
But, can data ships be hacked/manipulated?
Who owns the data on the chip and who has access to the data?
Do chips communicate with outside networks?
What laws are in place to define what is legal in implanting and using chips?
Will it always be voluntary to be “chipped“ - is it ethical?
Are chip implants forbidden by some religions?
Will ethical and moral procedures be breached by hackers?
Autonomous vehicles
What if a pedestrian suddenly appears on the road? If the brakes are applied hard the risk turns onto the passengers - is this ethical?
Who takes the blame if an accident occurs? The programmer, the manufacturer, the driver or someone else? What if the driver had a setting for a driver preference which increases risk for some while reducing it for others. This is a legal issue.
Issues in battery production and the generation of additional electrical power required to run a nation of electrical vehicles also needs considered - environmental issues
Privacy - location tracking for navigation and security?