1/10
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
The Treaty System
A treaty is a legal agreement between peoples or states, often involving land
Canada had a history of treaties with First Nations in Upper and Lower Canada before Confederation
Eleven treaties were made between the government and First Nations between 1871 and 1921 – the “Numbered Treaties” took up much of Rupert’s Land
In return for signing the treaties, the government promised to build schools on reservations and to provide farming tools and supplies to the Natives
Reservation System/Land Claims
Many Natives of Quebec, British Columbia and much of the current Northwest Territories never signed a treaty, but lost their land anyway
As a result, their aboriginal and legal rights to lands are still intact as affirmed by law and the Supreme Court of Canada
Land rights entrenched in Charter of Rights and Freedoms – “all existing rights”
Source of legal issues and conflicts
Substandard living conditions on many reserves
Residential Schools
Federal government assumed responsibility for educating Natives under Indian Act
Enforced policy of assimilation within schools
Schools administered by churches (Protestant and Catholic)
Children were forced to leave home and give up culture and language, and were abused if they did not
Most Natives educated in residential schools until 1970s; final residential school closed in 1990s
Cdn. government lost lawsuit + paid all plaintiffs
Indian Act of 1876
Government felt need to entrench policy toward Natives as an act of Parliament – how Canada should deal with the “Indian problem”, as it was phrased
Canada’s official policy was “assimilation”
Natives were encouraged to give up their culture to be “Canadian”
Pros: schools, medical care, hunting & fishing rights, payments, tax exemptions, and “special status” all provided by Canadian government
Cons: could not own land, could not vote (until 1960), traditional activities (potlatch) were outlawed, being “Indian” conflicted with Canadian citizenship
The White Paper
Chrétien and Trudeau saw the need for new government policy toward Natives, so they wrote the White Paper in 1969
Case for new policy – Aboriginals should have full rights as Canadians
Legal Structure – 1. Remove Indian Act + give equal rights; 2. No discrimination b/c Canada is just; 3. Racial tension, Natives angry on losing status?
Indian Cultural heritage – 1. Culture should be shared with all Canadians; 2. Aboriginals are underappreciated
The Oka Crisis (1990)
Town of Oka, QC wanted to extend a golf course onto traditionally Mohawk land
Mohawk warriors blockaded roads for over 6 months
Police stormed the blockade, and one officer was killed
Canadian Army was called in – standoff with Mohawk warriors
Can. govt. bought the land and transferred it to Kanesatake FN
Healing Circles and Restorative Justice
Aboriginal restorative justice focuses on healing the harm caused by an offence and rehabilitating the offender, aligning with traditional Indigenous views of justice. A key component is the healing circle, which includes the offender, elders, community members, and sometimes the victim. The circle discusses the impact of the offence, explores its root causes (like addiction or abuse), and works toward a consensus on how to repair the harm.
Possible remedies may include counselling, community service, traditional practices, direct restitution, or even public storytelling. This process can be more challenging than jail, as offenders must face their actions, and victims often feel more empowered and less traumatized.
Reaction to the White Paper
WPIP proposed to end special status and to abolish reserves; the solution proposed was the assimilation of Natives into mainstream culture
Native groups were upset at losing their rights and called the White Paper “cultural genocide”
Lobby groups were formed to represent Natives
White Paper withdrawn in 1971 after public outcry
Status vs. Non-Status “Indians”
Indian Act (1876) defined privileges and rights of Natives, including “special status”
“Status Indians” have legal rights under Indian Act or as Registered Indians (where no treaties were signed)
“Non-status Indians” retain their cultural identity, but have given up “special status” for gaining rights as Canadians (moved off-reserve, joined the military, obtained higher education, married a non-status Indian)
Definitions have started to be revisited, but still a significant source of conflict today
Problems with the Treaties
No concept of land ownership in Native culture
Treaties were a sign of friendship from Natives, not a binding legal arrangement
Natives did not understand English
Natives were afraid of treatment like in the US
Natives did not have much choice in the matter:
Canadians were pushing them off their land anyway
Buffalo were becoming extinct
Disease had killed up to 75% of their population
Impact of the Treaties
Severe droughts on the prairies in 1880s made it difficult for the Native people to take up farming
Government agents cheated the Natives and kept supplies for themselves
Much distrust of government, but little choice for Natives but to keep making treaties
Allowed Canada to peacefully expand into West
Relations between Canada and Natives strained
Entrenched “reserve” system
Many legal issues still arise from treaties