forensic psychology exam 2 case law

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 10 people
0.0(0)
call with kaiCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/20

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

21 Terms

1
New cards

dusky v united states

set the dusky standard addressing defendant psychological state at the time of trial

2
New cards

cooper v oklahoma

presumption of competency to stand trial established

3
New cards

medina v california

preponderance of evidence standard used for competency to stand trial

4
New cards

estelle v smith

competency to stand trial evaluations only introduced if defendant places their mental state into evidence

5
New cards

jackson v indiana

indefinite commitment of a defendant because of incompetency to stand trial is unconstitutional

6
New cards

rex v arnold

wild beast test

7
New cards

m’naghten

presumption that defendants are sane and responsible for their crime

8
New cards

durham v united states

guilty verdict overturned on appeal with prevailing insanity - “durham standard”

9
New cards

united states v brawned

removed the durham standard from DC courts

10
New cards

tarasoff v regents of the united states of california

civil suit against UC Berkeley suggesting Poddar’s therapist failed to warn Tarasoff about a dangerous patient, breaching their primary duty to protect the public

11
New cards

kansas v hendricks

first individual to be held under SVP laws (civil confinement of high risk potentially dangerous sex offenders)

12
New cards

united states v booker

judges do not mandatorily have to use the guidelines for sentencing

13
New cards

ruiz v johnson

solitary confinement cells are psychologically damaging and exacerbate existing mental health issues

14
New cards

cooper v pate

prisoners have the right to freely practice religion

15
New cards

procunier v martinez

prisoners have the right to send and receive mail

16
New cards

atkins v virginia

eliminated the death penalty for people with intellectual disabilities

17
New cards

ring v arizona

only juries can make decisions about the death penalty

18
New cards

panetti v quarterman

prisoner on death row must have a rational understanding of the reason for their execution

19
New cards

kennedy v louisiana

prohibits the death penalty for child rapists unless the child dies during the rape

20
New cards

roper v simmons

juveniles cannot be executed

21
New cards

lockett v ohio

must consider aggregating and mitigating factors when determining death penalty