Causes of the USSR's collapse- ECONOMIC

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/8

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

9 Terms

1
New cards

EXAMPLE OF GORB’S REFORMS:

Tackling Alcoholism

(what did he do)

  • legal age of consumption was raised to 21

  • no. shops where alcohol could be bought was reduced

  • the price tripled()

2
New cards

EXAMPLE OF GOB’S REFORMS:

Acceleration

  • 12th five year plan= sucuumbed to the old Soveit method of heavy investment to try and accelerate econ growth + productivity (focussed on agri, construction and engineering) ( increased investment in these areas, but some argue wasting money on investment into businesses that ultimately failed- ussr didnt have sufficient funds/strong enough econ to risk doing this)

  • 1986= ‘worker collectives’ so workers can elect their managers

3
New cards

EXAMPLE OF GORB’S REFORMS:

Perestroika

  • (economic restructuring)

  • loosened the tight control of GOSPLAN to grow the econ

  • introduced more market mechanisms→ co-operatives legalised (1988),, The encouragement of foreign joint ventures- Jan 1987( gorb wanted to make the ussr an attractive place to invest, he wanted to encourage foreign b’s to set up here (but many= hesistant as this=RISKY)

  • Many comms saw these ‘market mechanisms’ as introducing capitalism into the econ- hated this

4
New cards

RESULT OF GORB’S ALCOHOLISM REFORMS

-by mid 1980s= alcohol accounted for around 15% of all household spending meaning gov lost A LOT of tax revenue (around 10% of the GDP in total)

  • moonshine liquor- a household made alcohol) began to be produced in large quantities(often unhygennic and lots of people were dying)

5
New cards

IMPACT OF GORB’S ACCELERATION REFORMS

  • investments drained more money than intended from an already collapsing economy

  • war and arms race was still taking 15% of GDP→ this money could’ve been invested in ind

  • even in areas where productivity did increase, quality was mostly poor and sometimes unusable

  • process of acceleration meant the sov deficient went from 2.4% of GDPin 1985 to 6.2% in 1986

  • agri investment didnt improve productivity—> 20% OF SOV UNION’S FOODSTUFFS WAS STILL IMPORTED

6
New cards

IMPACTS OF PERESTROIKA

  • food prices increased→ led to hoarding→ led to food rationing to control the situation (1988 meat was rationed in 26/55 regions of russia

  • by end of 1990s, there were nearly 3000 joint foreign ventures in ussr BUT most= small-scale and had little impact on economy (big b’s=deterred by bureacracy and slow progress)

7
New cards
  • reforms seriously w_____ the a______ of the State P_____ Committee (GOSPLAN) BUT provided very l____ to replace it

  • soviet output declined by___% between 1990-91

  • critics said perestroika had led to c______ (an economic catastrophe)

  • deficit climbed to ____ rubles by 1988 as i________ investment, the d____ budget and the a___-d____ campaign

  • in october 19_ one of gorbachev’s e____ advisors put forward the __ Days P____ which recommended a rapid m___ to a m___ economy (accepted by russian parliament but rejected by sov gov)

  • reforms seriously weakened the aapparatus of state planning committee but provided very little to replace it

  • sov output declined by 20%

  • catastroik

  • 93 rubles as: inefficient investment, anti-drinking campaign and defence budget)

  • 1988, economic,, the 500 Days Programme,, rapid move to a market economy

8
New cards

WHAT AND WHEN WAS THE NOVOSIBIRSK REPORT??

1983

  • drew attention to the growing crisis in agricaused by state inefficiency and inflexibility

IT SAID THE REASONS FOR INEFFICIENCY WERE:

  • alcoholism→ amount drank by workers= affected productivity and cost of healthcare

  • lack of incentive→ workers by 1980s had a far more negative view of comms and hard work resulted in little/no increase in material wealth

  • conservative centralisation→ central planning agencies could effectively regulate the hugue and increasingly sophisticated econ(as light econ increased) + quantity> quality meant millions of products every year= unusable

9
New cards