Poverty, Housing and Education - Johnson’s Great Society

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/87

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

88 Terms

1
New cards

Great Society

What domestic vision did Johnson outline in May 1964?

2
New cards

End of poverty

One aim of the Great Society

3
New cards

Racial equality

One aim of the Great Society

4
New cards

Educational reform

One aim of the Great Society

5
New cards

Modern housing

One aim of the Great Society

6
New cards

End of urban decay

One aim of the Great Society

7
New cards

Renewed sense of community

One aim of the Great Society

8
New cards

Environmentalism

One aim of the Great Society

9
New cards

Peace with other nations

One aim of the Great Society

10
New cards

Unconditional war on poverty

What did Johnson declare in January 1964?

11
New cards

Economic Opportunity Act (EOA) 1964

Which act launched the War on Poverty?

12
New cards

Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO)

Which body coordinated the War on Poverty?

13
New cards

February 1965

When Johnson reported progress on the War on Poverty to Congress

14
New cards

Head Start programme

Programme helping poor pre-school children prepare for school

15
New cards

Nearly 1 million children

Number helped by Head Start

16
New cards

Upward Bound programme

Linked poorer students with higher education institutions

17
New cards

50,000 students per year

Annual participants in Upward Bound

18
New cards

Food Stamp programme extension

Anti-poverty measure expanded under Johnson

19
New cards

35% rise in minimum wage

Economic reform under the Great Society

20
New cards

Critics of War on Poverty

Why was Johnson criticised over poverty policy?

21
New cards

Spending too high AND too low

Conflicting criticisms of funding levels

22
New cards

Failure to eradicate poverty

Overall judgement on War on Poverty

23
New cards

One-third of non-white families below poverty line

Evidence poverty persisted

24
New cards

Unemployment nearly twice as high for non-whites

Evidence of continuing inequality

25
New cards

Infant mortality nearly twice as high for non-whites

Evidence of continuing inequality

26
New cards

54 million Americans never finished high school

Education problem in 1960s

27
New cards

8 million Americans had under 5 years of education

Education problem in 1960s

28
New cards

100,000 high school graduates couldn’t afford college

Education problem in 1960s

29
New cards

Overcrowded schools

Education problem in 1960s

30
New cards

Shortage of good teachers

Education problem in 1960s

31
New cards

$8 billion education spending

How much Johnson persuaded Congress to spend on education

32
New cards

Higher Education Act (HEA) 1965

Main aim of the HEA

33
New cards

11 million poorer students benefited

Impact of the HEA

34
New cards

25% of college students by 1970

Proportion receiving HEA financial aid

35
New cards

College attendance rose 15% to 32% (1950–1970)

Impact of HEA on participation

36
New cards

Greatly increased opportunity for low-income students

Why HEA was praised

37
New cards

Helped poorly funded black colleges

Additional impact of HEA

38
New cards

Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) 1965

Johnson’s key anti-poverty education act

39
New cards

6.7 million poor children benefited

Impact of ESEA

40
New cards

Johnson framed ESEA as helping all children

Why ESEA was politically acceptable

41
New cards

1985 National Institute of Education finding

Criticism of ESEA spending outcomes

42
New cards

Money went to children above poverty line

Criticism of ESEA

43
New cards

Federal government struggled to control local districts

Criticism of ESEA

44
New cards

Federal aid to schools reinforced

Why liberals supported ESEA

45
New cards

Encouraged greater state investment in education

Impact of ESEA

46
New cards

Urban poverty, poor housing and pollution

Problems in American inner cities

47
New cards

Congestion in inner cities

Problem facing cities in the 1960s

48
New cards

Congress accepted several housing reforms

How Johnson tackled housing problems

49
New cards

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) 1965

Purpose of HUD

50
New cards

Coordinated housing and urban renewal programmes

HUD role

51
New cards

Over ¾ of Americans lived in urban areas

Context for housing reform

52
New cards

Demonstration Cities Act 1966

Official name of the Model Cities programme

53
New cards

Chicago, Detroit, Houston, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Washington DC

Original model cities

54
New cards

Model cities tackled housing, transport and recreation

Aims of model cities

55
New cards

Programme underfunded at $1.2 billion

Main weakness of model cities

56
New cards

Johnson estimated $2.4 billion was needed

Funding criticism

57
New cards

New York Times said NYC alone needed $6 billion

Criticism of funding

58
New cards

Robert Kennedy called it a “drop in the bucket”

Criticism of model cities

59
New cards

Expanded from 6 to 150 cities

Why model cities failed

60
New cards

Money spread too thin

Why model cities failed

61
New cards

Omnibus Housing Act 1965

Aimed to improve ghetto housing

62
New cards

Rent supplements provided

Policy under Omnibus Housing Act

63
New cards

$8 billion for low- and moderate-income housing

Funding under Omnibus Housing Act

64
New cards

Federal loans and persuasion used

How Johnson encouraged builders

65
New cards

Ghettos remained in poor condition

Outcome of housing policy

66
New cards

White taxpayers unwilling to help

Obstacle to housing reform

67
New cards

1968 housing focus

What Johnson prioritised late in presidency

68
New cards

Ending discrimination in housing

Aim of 1968 reforms

69
New cards

Would cost taxpayers nothing

Johnson’s argument for fair housing

70
New cards

Reduce overcrowding in ghettos

Aim of fair housing

71
New cards

Fair Housing Act 1968

Legislation passed by Congress

72
New cards

Job Corps

OEO programme providing job training

73
New cards

53 Job Corps centres

Scale of Job Corps

74
New cards

Thousands of applications daily

Evidence of demand

75
New cards

25,000 welfare families in work training

Impact of work training schemes

76
New cards

35,000 college students in work-study

Impact of work-study programmes

77
New cards

35,000 adults learning literacy

Impact of literacy programmes

78
New cards

90,000 adults in basic education

Impact of adult education

79
New cards

Neighbourhood Youth Corps

Programme giving young people jobs

80
New cards

Helped young people stay in education or training

Aim of Youth Corps

81
New cards

49 cities and 11 rural communities

Scale of Youth Corps

82
New cards

VISTA

Service to America volunteer programme

83
New cards

8,000 VISTA volunteers

Scale of VISTA

84
New cards

Helped needy children, Native Americans and migrant workers

Groups helped by VISTA

85
New cards

Aid to Families with Dependent Children

Anti-poverty welfare programme

86
New cards

Over 4 million recipients

Scale of AFDC

87
New cards

Loans for small businesses and rural development

Economic support policy

88
New cards

$17 million in rural loans (1968)

Evidence of rural development support