Chapter 6: Authoritarian Regimes
Authoritarian rule, in a sense, has existed since the beginning of human government.
Democracy (as defined in the previous chapter) is a political system that has existed only since the twentieth century.
Authoritarian regimes are distinguished by the way they invest political authority into a small group of individuals who exercise this authority without any constitutional responsibility to the public.
Authoritarian regime a regime that concentrates power in an authority that is not responsible or accountable to the public
Totalitarian regimes attempt to control and dominate every aspect of their people’s lives, including their career choices, family life, and their political and religious beliefs.
Wealthier societies of the developed world are almost universally liberal democracies today.
Widely distributed wealth among a large middle class deeply undermines authoritarian systems, as people with their own wealth have a “stake” in the political decisions of the state, and thus a strong desire for their demands to be heard in policymaking.
The impact of political culture cannot be overstated in the emergence of democratic or authoritarian regimes.
Political culture norms, values, and expectations held by the public and elites about how the competition for and the wielding of political power should function
Statism, or the tendency to trust in the state for security and provision of basic needs, for example, emerged in Russia after centuries of foreign invasion and oppression.
Statism a belief that the state should take a central role in protecting and providing for the society
While religion does not automatically push a society toward democracy or authoritarianism, some religions are more prone to nondemocratic tendencies than others.
Catholicism and Islam, for example, establish formal religious hierarchies that must be respected by adherents to the faith, and advancement up the “ladder” of authority in each is determined by those who are already on the inside.
It is important to note that these methods are also used by democratic regimes when necessary to implement a policy decision or maintain legitimacy, but they are more consistently observable in authoritarian systems, and they are frequently lacking the basic protections of civil liberties in the manner they are used.
Coercion the use of force or the threat of force to compel others to take actions they would not otherwise choose
Some regimes use coercion, which essentially means force, to compel people to submit to the regime.
The tactics of coercion can include surveillance of perceived dissidents, as China employs through government agents who follow the regime’s critics, and Internet monitors who track people’s activities.
While democratic regimes have free and independent media outlets that may investigate and criticize the conduct and policy decisions of those in power, authoritarian regimes use a variety of mechanisms to restrict the independence of the media to report news that could be problematic for the government.
Civil society describes all the various organized groups people choose to join for the sake of a common interest.
These include religious organizations, interest groups, clubs, charitable organizations, labor unions, professional organizations, and many others.
An independent civil society that can organize freely is a critical component of liberal democracy, as it allows the people to express their interests, organize to call attention to issues of concern, and demand state action at times.
Authoritarian regimes limit their ability to organize and express dissenting views to preserve the status quo.
Totalitarian regime a political system that attempts to control nearly all aspects of the lives of its citizens and subjects
Authoritarian regimes use many methods to prevent these opposition groups from competing for power fairly, in an effort to guarantee victory for the party in power.
These methods include but are not limited to:
Arrest of opposition leaders and candidates for crimes (usually without much basis in applicable law)
Disqualification of party or candidate registration for bureaucratic or technical reasons
Questionable conduct of elections or ballot-counting processes
Restricting opposition candidates’ access to media
Cooptation to assimilate or take a smaller group into a larger group so as to prevent opposition from the smaller group
Perhaps the most consistent tactic authoritarian regimes use is that of cooptation, or bringing groups and individuals into a beneficial relationship with the state so they do not challenge the legitimacy of the regime.
One common form of this strategy is state corporatism, often shortened simply to corporatism.
State corporatism a system to influence policymaking: the state establishes or selects groups to represent various interests rather than allow independently formed groups to participate
Another strategy of cooptation is patron-clientelism, or clientelism for short.
Patron-clientelism mutual arrangements in which a patron with authority, political power, social status, or wealth uses these assets to provide benefits to clients, who provide political support in return
Rulers in authoritarian systems can place people into key positions of power with official authority, which can often be used (or abused) for personal gain.
Corruption is a concept closely related to patron-clientelism and patron-client networks.
While most people have a general understanding of what corruption implies, it has a very specific definition in political science.
Corruption the abuse or misuse of official authority for personal or private gain
Power is the ability to compel or otherwise motivate people to take actions that they otherwise would not.
Authority involves an official position with a defined role and jurisdiction that the state has entrusted an individual with.
Authority power or responsibility that comes from a legally established office of the state
Power the ability to influence others to take actions they would not otherwise take
Personality Cult - More common to totalitarianism, some authoritarian regimes will attempt to portray the leader as some sort of near perfected version of the nation’s aspirations, embodying the wisdom, strength, and spirit of the people more generally.
Personality cult the use of media, propaganda, spectacles, social controls, and other mechanisms by the state to promote an idealized and heroic image of the country’s leader
Personal Rule - Systems based on personal rule do not possess any clear rules or regime boundaries to constrain the ruler.
Personal rule a type of authoritarian regime centered upon a single personality as the leader, who is empowered to shape policy and the regime to his or her own preferences
The regime can be reshaped to the interests of the ruler as he or she sees fit.
Military Rule - Military rule usually comes as the result of a coup d’état (sometimes called a coup, for short), which occurs when the military of a particular state decides to remove the civil authorities from within and take control of the state itself.
Coup d’état (coup) the seizure of control of the state apparatus by the military
One-Party Rule - In a one-party state, also known as a dominant-party system, only one political party is either legally or practically able to compete for and exercise political power.
One-party system a party system in which only one political party is allowed to hold political power and the existence of opposition parties is restricted by the state
Dominant-party system a party system in which one party consistently controls the government, though other parties may also exist and run
Illiberal democracy a regime in which, despite the fact that elections determine who holds political office and wields power, protection of civil rights and liberties is missing and the fairness and competitiveness of elections are questionable
The intention of a theocracy is rule by God, but practically, the power is held by religious leaders, and so a theocratic regime entrusts rule of the state to clerical religious authorities simultaneously with their religious role.
Theocracy a regime that fuses religious and political authority
Rules of the regime and laws passed by the government are often required to be consistent with religious doctrines asserted by clerics.
Despite the trend of democratization across many parts of the world in recent decades, authoritarianism has proven to be highly resilient and resistant to change.
Political cultures that have been ingrained with authoritarian tendencies for many centuries are not likely to reform their institutions quickly, and even when political changes come through rapid coups or revolutions, many of those same authoritarian tendencies continue to emerge.
Authoritarian rule, in a sense, has existed since the beginning of human government.
Democracy (as defined in the previous chapter) is a political system that has existed only since the twentieth century.
Authoritarian regimes are distinguished by the way they invest political authority into a small group of individuals who exercise this authority without any constitutional responsibility to the public.
Authoritarian regime a regime that concentrates power in an authority that is not responsible or accountable to the public
Totalitarian regimes attempt to control and dominate every aspect of their people’s lives, including their career choices, family life, and their political and religious beliefs.
Wealthier societies of the developed world are almost universally liberal democracies today.
Widely distributed wealth among a large middle class deeply undermines authoritarian systems, as people with their own wealth have a “stake” in the political decisions of the state, and thus a strong desire for their demands to be heard in policymaking.
The impact of political culture cannot be overstated in the emergence of democratic or authoritarian regimes.
Political culture norms, values, and expectations held by the public and elites about how the competition for and the wielding of political power should function
Statism, or the tendency to trust in the state for security and provision of basic needs, for example, emerged in Russia after centuries of foreign invasion and oppression.
Statism a belief that the state should take a central role in protecting and providing for the society
While religion does not automatically push a society toward democracy or authoritarianism, some religions are more prone to nondemocratic tendencies than others.
Catholicism and Islam, for example, establish formal religious hierarchies that must be respected by adherents to the faith, and advancement up the “ladder” of authority in each is determined by those who are already on the inside.
It is important to note that these methods are also used by democratic regimes when necessary to implement a policy decision or maintain legitimacy, but they are more consistently observable in authoritarian systems, and they are frequently lacking the basic protections of civil liberties in the manner they are used.
Coercion the use of force or the threat of force to compel others to take actions they would not otherwise choose
Some regimes use coercion, which essentially means force, to compel people to submit to the regime.
The tactics of coercion can include surveillance of perceived dissidents, as China employs through government agents who follow the regime’s critics, and Internet monitors who track people’s activities.
While democratic regimes have free and independent media outlets that may investigate and criticize the conduct and policy decisions of those in power, authoritarian regimes use a variety of mechanisms to restrict the independence of the media to report news that could be problematic for the government.
Civil society describes all the various organized groups people choose to join for the sake of a common interest.
These include religious organizations, interest groups, clubs, charitable organizations, labor unions, professional organizations, and many others.
An independent civil society that can organize freely is a critical component of liberal democracy, as it allows the people to express their interests, organize to call attention to issues of concern, and demand state action at times.
Authoritarian regimes limit their ability to organize and express dissenting views to preserve the status quo.
Totalitarian regime a political system that attempts to control nearly all aspects of the lives of its citizens and subjects
Authoritarian regimes use many methods to prevent these opposition groups from competing for power fairly, in an effort to guarantee victory for the party in power.
These methods include but are not limited to:
Arrest of opposition leaders and candidates for crimes (usually without much basis in applicable law)
Disqualification of party or candidate registration for bureaucratic or technical reasons
Questionable conduct of elections or ballot-counting processes
Restricting opposition candidates’ access to media
Cooptation to assimilate or take a smaller group into a larger group so as to prevent opposition from the smaller group
Perhaps the most consistent tactic authoritarian regimes use is that of cooptation, or bringing groups and individuals into a beneficial relationship with the state so they do not challenge the legitimacy of the regime.
One common form of this strategy is state corporatism, often shortened simply to corporatism.
State corporatism a system to influence policymaking: the state establishes or selects groups to represent various interests rather than allow independently formed groups to participate
Another strategy of cooptation is patron-clientelism, or clientelism for short.
Patron-clientelism mutual arrangements in which a patron with authority, political power, social status, or wealth uses these assets to provide benefits to clients, who provide political support in return
Rulers in authoritarian systems can place people into key positions of power with official authority, which can often be used (or abused) for personal gain.
Corruption is a concept closely related to patron-clientelism and patron-client networks.
While most people have a general understanding of what corruption implies, it has a very specific definition in political science.
Corruption the abuse or misuse of official authority for personal or private gain
Power is the ability to compel or otherwise motivate people to take actions that they otherwise would not.
Authority involves an official position with a defined role and jurisdiction that the state has entrusted an individual with.
Authority power or responsibility that comes from a legally established office of the state
Power the ability to influence others to take actions they would not otherwise take
Personality Cult - More common to totalitarianism, some authoritarian regimes will attempt to portray the leader as some sort of near perfected version of the nation’s aspirations, embodying the wisdom, strength, and spirit of the people more generally.
Personality cult the use of media, propaganda, spectacles, social controls, and other mechanisms by the state to promote an idealized and heroic image of the country’s leader
Personal Rule - Systems based on personal rule do not possess any clear rules or regime boundaries to constrain the ruler.
Personal rule a type of authoritarian regime centered upon a single personality as the leader, who is empowered to shape policy and the regime to his or her own preferences
The regime can be reshaped to the interests of the ruler as he or she sees fit.
Military Rule - Military rule usually comes as the result of a coup d’état (sometimes called a coup, for short), which occurs when the military of a particular state decides to remove the civil authorities from within and take control of the state itself.
Coup d’état (coup) the seizure of control of the state apparatus by the military
One-Party Rule - In a one-party state, also known as a dominant-party system, only one political party is either legally or practically able to compete for and exercise political power.
One-party system a party system in which only one political party is allowed to hold political power and the existence of opposition parties is restricted by the state
Dominant-party system a party system in which one party consistently controls the government, though other parties may also exist and run
Illiberal democracy a regime in which, despite the fact that elections determine who holds political office and wields power, protection of civil rights and liberties is missing and the fairness and competitiveness of elections are questionable
The intention of a theocracy is rule by God, but practically, the power is held by religious leaders, and so a theocratic regime entrusts rule of the state to clerical religious authorities simultaneously with their religious role.
Theocracy a regime that fuses religious and political authority
Rules of the regime and laws passed by the government are often required to be consistent with religious doctrines asserted by clerics.
Despite the trend of democratization across many parts of the world in recent decades, authoritarianism has proven to be highly resilient and resistant to change.
Political cultures that have been ingrained with authoritarian tendencies for many centuries are not likely to reform their institutions quickly, and even when political changes come through rapid coups or revolutions, many of those same authoritarian tendencies continue to emerge.