1/5
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Problems with the OAPA 1861
Back:
❌ The language is outdated (e.g., "grievous" = old-fashioned, unclear
❌ Statute is over 150 years old, not fit for modern law
❌ No clear hierarchy between offences - e.g., ABH (s.47) has same sentence as assault but more serious harm
❌ Wounding under s.20 can include minor injuries like a split lip (JCC v Eisenhower)
❌ s.18 and s.20 both use the word "maliciously" - vague and misleading
What are the non-fatal offences under the OAPA 1861?
Assault - common law, charged under s.39 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Battery - common law, charged under s.39 CJA 1988
ABH - s.47 OAPA 1861
GBH/Wounding - s.20 OAPA 1861
GBH with intent - s.18 OAPA 1861
Mens Rea issues with s.20 and s.47
❌ s.20 only requires foresight of some harm, yet the result could be serious (Parmenter)
❌ s.47 has no requirement for D to foresee harm - just intent for assault/battery
⚠️ This is seen as unfair - serious consequences, low culpability
✅ s.18 requires intent to cause serious harm - clear and proportionate
Reform suggestions for non-fatal offences
Law Commission (1993 & 2015 reports):
Replace OAPA with clear, modern offences
Suggested new structure:
Intentional serious injury (replaces s.18)
Reckless serious injury (replaces s.20)
Intentional or reckless injury (replaces s.47)
Assault and Battery kept as summary offences
✅ Greater clarity, fairness, and proportionality in law
Case example: Why the OAPA is criticised - Savage (1991)
D threw a drink at V, accidentally smashed glass and cut her
🔹 Convicted of s.20 GBH - only foresaw some harm
❌ Demonstrates how s.20 allows liability for serious injury with low foresight
📌 Criticised for breaching the correspondence principle (MR should match AR)
Why reform is necessary
✅ Protects victims, ensures legal certainty
❌ Current law lacks structure and clarity
📌 Law Commission reforms would simplify and modernise criminal law
✅ Better reflects harm and blameworthiness of D
✅ Easier for juries and lawyers to apply correctly