1/23
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
what is the behaviourist approach
a way of explaining behaviour in terms of what is observable and in terms of learning
assumptions
concerned with observable behaviour that can be objectively and scientifically measured
psychology is a science so must be measured in highly controlled environments to establish causation
when we are born our mind is a blank slate with no genetic influence so behaviour is learnt from the environment
there is little difference between the learning that occurs in humans and animals
what is classical conditioning
learning by association - an association is made between a previously neutral stimulus and reflex response (positive or negative)
who studied classical conditioning
PAVLOV
PAVLOV background
initially focused on digestive system of dogs
realised dogs salivate automatically when they see food and did when the door was opened even if food was not being provided - looked at this association
PAVLOV procedure
rang a bell (NS) when dogs were given food to become associated
eventually when the bell was rang the dogs would salivate even if no food was present (bell = CS)
thus he showed how a NS (a bell) can come to elicit a new learned response (CR) through association
definition of = UCS, NS and CS
UCS = leads to an automatic response
NS = at first elicits no response
CS = leads to a response after being associated with the UCS
what is operant conditioning
works on the principle of learning by consequence
what are the three ways
positive reinforcement
negative reinforcement
punishment
positive reinforcement
performing a behaviour to experience the positive consequence eg completing homework for praise
recieving a reward when a certain behaviour is performed which makes this behaviour more likely to reoccur because of positive consequences
negative reinforcement
performing a behaviour to avoid unpleasant consequences eg completing homework to avoid detention
increases the likelihood of certain behaviour occurring because it involves the removal of, or escaping from, unpleasant consequences
behaviour is more likely to reoccur due to the avoidance of a negative consequence
punishment
an unpleasant consequence of behaviour which weakens it through deterrence
who investigated operant conditioning
SKINNER
SKINNERs procedure
developed ‘the skinner box’
tested it on different animals like pigeons and rats
hungry rat is placed in box
inside box is a lever
when the lever is pressed it would deliver a pellet of food
SKINNERs findings
rat soon learned that pressing the lever would result in food (positive reinforcement)
observed that as a consequence of its actions, the rat continued to display this new learned behaviour as it was positively reinforced
SKINNER and negative reinforcement
subjected rat to an electric shock (punishment)
rat initially accidentally triggered the lever while exploring box
after triggering, the current was switched off
rats quickly learned to trigger the lever immediately
evaluation
well controlled research
ethical issues
application
environmentally deterministic
environmentally reductionist
classical conditioning limitation
operant conditioning limitation
well controlled research
experiments focus on observable behaviour in highly controlled labs
eg SKINNERS research
by emphasising importance of scientific processes (objectivity & replicability) it was influential in developing psych as a scientific discipline
ethical issues
experiments like those conducted by SKINNER involve keeping animals in harsh conditions such as underfeeding them to motivate responses
these violate ethical standards for animal welfare
raises concerns about how findings from ethically questionable experiments generalise to humans
real world application
techniques like token economies have been successfully applied in prisons & psychiatric wards, where desirable behaviours are awarded with tokens exchangeable for privileges (operant conditioning)
understanding of phobias through the two process model proposed by MOWRER has led to therapies such as systematic desensitisation
environmentally deterministic
views behaviour as entirely shaped by past conditioning ignoring free will
SKINNER suggested that free will is an illusion, believing we feel as though we have free will but it is just our past conditioning that determines our decisions
deterministic stance ignores influence of conscious decision making processes
environmentally reductionist
research is oversimplistic
humans are more complex and sophisticated than animals and operate at a higher cognitive level
people are more able to take control of their behaviour via mechanisms such as self-efficacy than behaviourists give them credit for
classical conditioning limitation
not universal as cannot explain all forms of behaviour
ie behaviour which is spontaneous or original like dying your hair neon pink, or behaviour that resists conditioning like someone brought up in a strict religious household who then rejects the religion
low external validity
operant conditioning limitation
cannot explain why some people may repeat behaviours that are unpleasant
ie people who self harm may do so for the relief it brings them but such behaviours are not recognised as positive reinforcers by operant conditioning