Lozano vs. De los santos G.R. No. 125221, June 19, 1997

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/24

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 7:31 AM on 2/5/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

25 Terms

1
New cards
G.R. No. 125221 Date
June 19, 1997
2
New cards
Petitioner in the case
Reynaldo M. Lozano
3
New cards
Respondents in the case
Judge Eliezer De Los Santos and Antonio Anda
4
New cards
Petition for Certiorari
Formal request for a higher court to fix a lower court's mistake
5
New cards
Damages
Money claimed as compensation for harm or loss
6
New cards
KAMAJDA
The jeepney drivers' association where Reynaldo was president
7
New cards
SAMAJODA
The rival jeepney drivers' association where Antonio was president
8
New cards
UMAJODA
The proposed unified association intended to merge KAMAJDA and SAMAJODA
9
New cards
Basis of Antonio's refusal
Claimed election fraud and refused to recognize Reynaldo's win
10
New cards
Motion to Dismiss
A formal request to throw a case out of court
11
New cards
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Government agency that oversees corporations and internal corporate fights
12
New cards
Jurisdiction
The legal power or authority to hear and decide a case
13
New cards
Intracorporate dispute
A legal fight happening inside a corporation between its members or officers
14
New cards
Reynaldo's main argument
SEC only handles fights within registered companies; UMAJODA was not registered
15
New cards
Presidential Decree No. 902-A
Law listing the specific disputes the SEC is authorized to handle
16
New cards
Two requirements for SEC jurisdiction
A corporate relationship exists and the fight concerns internal corporate business
17
New cards
Consolidation
When two groups join to form a brand new legal entity
18
New cards
Legal requirement for consolidation
Becomes official only when SEC issues a certificate of consolidation
19
New cards
Separate entities
Independent legal "persons" or organizations
20
New cards
Status of KAMAJDA and SAMAJODA
Remained separate entities because UMAJODA lacked an SEC certificate
21
New cards
Corporation by Estoppel
Rule treating a group as a corporation if they acted like one
22
New cards
Limitation of Jurisdiction
Set by law, not by what people pretend to be or agree
23
New cards
Purpose of Estoppel rule
To protect innocent outsiders tricked into business with a fake company
24
New cards
Why Estoppel failed here
Fight was between parties who knew the company was not registered
25
New cards
Supreme Court Verdict
Granted petition, canceled RTC orders, and returned case to MCTC