Weakness of the opposition (Whigs) 1783-89

How did the Whig’s position weaken under the Fox- North Coalition?

• Pitt introduced a proposal for electoral reform (tackling issue of bribery and rotten boroughs)- proposal didn’t pass 293-149 causing tensions (pro and opp of reform in coalition) and enhanced Pitt’s reputation as a committed reformer

• 1783 India Bill- to address problems with East India Company- seven commissioners would’ve been appointed to manage Indian affairs but by parliament rather than the king. (Looked like they were trying to increase their own power/self interested)

• India bill thrown out at lords- George and ‘enemies’ and gov dismissed.

How did the 1784 election lead to their weakness?

• Fox- seen less as a reformer than Pitt- association with Lord North who was seen as the ‘father of corruption’ and image of a gambler and womaniser meant he wasn’t seen as a reformer.

• 1784- more than 100 foxites lost their seat

Why did those who could vote freely, not vote for the Whig’s?

• they were worried about the power of the party more than the power of the king esp. with the India Bill which demonstrated classic case of politicians trying to gain more power

How else did Pitt benefit from his opponents?

• 17 peers and 29 MP’s quit when Pitt was announced as PM- helped him - give jobs to others for support

• Fox- attempt to withhold supply and prevent annual renewal of mutiny act - irresponsible and promoting their own interests and meant more supported Pitt.