Offences Against the Property

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/19

flashcard set

Earn XP

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

20 Terms

1
New cards

Theft Section and Definition

s.1 Theft Act 1968

Dishonestly appropriating property belonging to another with the intention to permanently deprive.

2
New cards

Dishonesty (s.2)

Not dishonest if D believes:

  • they have a legal right

  • the owner would consent

  • the owner can’t be found

3
New cards

Ivey Test

  1. What was the defendant’s actual state of mind regarding the facts?

  2. Was their conduct dishonest by the standards of ordinary decent people?

4
New cards

Appropriation (s.3)

Any assumption of the rights of the owner.

5
New cards

Appropriation Cases

🧷 R v Morris – Switching price labels = appropriation.
🧷 R v Gomez – Consent doesn’t stop appropriation.
🧷 R v Hinks – Even accepting a gift can be appropriation.

6
New cards

Property (s.4) includes

Includes:

money

personal property

real property

things in action

intangible property.

7
New cards

Property (s.4) excludes

Excludes: wild flowers (unless for sale), information (Oxford v Moss).

8
New cards

Belonging to Another (s.5)

Anyone having possession, control or proprietary interest.

9
New cards

Belonging to Another (s.5) case law

🧷 R v Turner (No.2) – Stealing your own car from a garage = theft.
🧷 R v Davidge v Bunnett – Using gas bill money on presents = theft.

10
New cards

Intention to Permanently Deprive (s.6) case law

🧷 R v Velumyl – Taking money with plan to return different coins = theft.
🧷 R v Lloyd – Borrowing a film and returning it intact = not theft.

11
New cards

ROBBERY – s.8 Theft Act 1968 definition

Theft with use or threat of force immediately before or at the time of theft, in order to steal.

12
New cards

ROBBERY – s.8 Theft Act 1968 cases

🧷 R v Dawson and James – Even small force (e.g. nudging) counts.
🧷 R v Hale – Force used during theft can still count.
🧷 R v Lockley – Force used to escape = still robbery if theft continues.

13
New cards

🔓 BURGLARY – s.9 Theft Act 1968 - s.9(1)(a)

Entry with intent to:

  • Steal

  • Inflict GBH

  • Do unlawful damage

14
New cards

🔓 BURGLARY – s.9 Theft Act 1968 - s.9(1)(b)

Entry and then commits/attempts:

  • Theft

  • GBH

15
New cards

Entry case law

🧷 R v Ryan – Entry can be partial if effective.

16
New cards

Building or part of a building case law


🧷 B and S v Leathley – Freezer container used for storage = building.
🧷 Norfolk Constabulary v Seekings and Gould – Lorry trailer with wheels = not a building.

17
New cards

Trespasser case law


🧷 R v Collins – Invitation must be genuine to avoid trespass.
🧷 R v Smith and Jones – Going beyond permission = trespass.

18
New cards

Max theft sentence

7 years

19
New cards

Max robbery sentence

Life

20
New cards

Max burglary sentence

10 - non dwelling

14 - dwelling