1/4
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Intro:
legal commentators
Set up debate
Ao1:
common law
Only for things lower than ABH - but exception!
Rules of consent
P1:
Common law:
Advantages - flexible
Disadvantages - uncertainty, unfairness
R v Brown 1994 and R v Wilson 1997
Reform by codification
P2:
Exception:
horseplay, sport, bodily adornment and surgery
R v Jones and Others 1986 and R v Aitken 1992 - absolved of liability because horseplay
Confusion of bodily adornment - R v BM - not in the public’s best interest - limited freedom of expression - unclear what is acceptable
P3:
Development of statutes:
Based on consent case law
Sexual Offences Act 1956 - rules on consent, what is consent and enthusiastic agreement vs reluctant submission - relevant to R v Olugboja
Domestic Abuse Act 2021 - a person cannot consent to serious harm being inflicted on them in a domestic relationship