1/62
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Yalom’s Therapeutic Factors
Instillation of Hope
Imparting information
Altruism
Development of socializing techniques
Imitative behavior
Interpersonal learning
Cohesiveness
Group Protocol
Provides a framework for the entire program
Developed based on population or group needs and evidence
Establishes the long term goals
If the original leader cannot run the group, a new person uses the protocol to help plan and run the group in their absence
This is a living document and will likely need to be reformulated periodically
Used to create documentation process
Anatomy of a Group Protocol
Create a name that represents the group and encourages people to attend
Rationale - can be pulled from assessment
Frequency and length of meetings - first open or closed and the length, then if closed how many groups you will do total
Meeting space - can be pulled from assessment
Goals -
Composition - need to decide whos in and not
Leadership is simple - OT & OTA
References for your intervention - reflects goals
Group methods and procedures - use cole steps. In each section list some of the things you might use for that section
Cole Group Roles
Initiator-Contributor
Information Seeker
Information Giver
Opinion Seeker
Opinion Giver
Elaborator
Coordinator
Orienter
Evaluator-Critic
Energizer
Procedural Technician
Recorder
Cole Group Building and Maintenance Roles
Encourager
Harmonizer
Compromiser
Gatekeeper/Expediter
Standard Setter
Group Observer/Commentator
Follower
Cole Individual Roles
Aggressor
Blocker
Recognition Seeker
Self-Confessor
Playboy
Dominator
Help-Seeker
Special Interest Pleader
Initiator-Contributor (Group Task Role)
suggests new ideas, innovative solutions to problems, unique procedures, and new ways to organize
Information Seeker (Group Task Role)
asks for clarification of suggestions, focuses on facts
Opinion Seeker (Group Task Role)
seeks clarification of values and attitudes presented
Information Giver (Group Task Role)
Offers facts or generalizations “automatically”
Opinion Giver (Group Task Role)
states beliefs or opinions
Elaborator (Group Task Role)
spells out suggestions and gives examples
Coordinator (Group Task Role)
clarifies relationships among various ideas
Orienter (Group Task Role)
defines position of group with respect to its goals
Evaluator-Critic (Group Task Role)
subjects accomplishments of group to some standard of group functioning
Energizer (Group Task Role)
prods the group into action or decision
Procedural Technician (Group Task Role)
expedites group’s movement by doing things for the group, such as distributing materials, arranging seating
Recorder (Group Task Role)
writes down suggestions and group decisions, acts as the “group memory”
Encourager (Group Building and Maintenance Roles)
praises, agrees with and accepts the contributions of others
Harmonizer (Group Building and Maintenance Roles)
Mediated the differences between other members
Compromiser (Group Building and Maintenance Roles)
modifies their own position in the interest of group harmony
Gatekeeper/Expediter (Group Building and Maintenance Roles)
keeps communication channels open by regulating its flow and facilitating participation of others
Standard Setter (Group Building and Maintenance Roles)
expresses ideal standards for the group to aspire to
Group Observer/Commentator (Group Building and Maintenance Roles)
comments on and interprets the process of the group
Follower (Group Building and Maintenance Roles)
passively accepts the ideas of others and goes along with the movement of the group
Aggressor (Individual Role)
deflates the status of others; expressed disapproval of the value, acts or feelings of others; attack the group or group task
Blocker (Individual Role)
tends to be negativistic or stubbornly resistant, opposing beyond reason or maintaining issues the group has rejected
Recognition Seeker (Individual Role)
calls attention to self through boasting, acting in unusual ways, or struggling to remain in the limelight
Self-Confessor (Individual Role)
uses group as an audience for expressing non-group-oriented feelings, insights or ideologies
Playboy (Individual Role)
displays lack of involvement through joking, cynicism or nonchalance
Dominator (Individual Role)
monopolizes group through manipulation, flattery, giving directions authoritatively, or interrupting the contribution of others
Help-Seeker (Individual Role)
looks for sympathy from the group through unreasonable insecurity, personal confusion or self deprecation
Special Interest Pleader (Individual Role)
cloaks their own biases in the stereotypes of social causes, such as the laborer, the housewife, the homeless, or the small businessperson
Theories of Leadership
Research clearly indicates that leadership is not a personality trait - leadership is a relationship between the persons in a social situation. A person that is a leader is one situation, may not be in another
Groups select their leaders according to how well the person’s skill or knowledge meets the needs of the group
Lewin
autocratic, democratic, laissez-faire
Transformational Leadership
idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individualized consideration - visionary
Transactional Leadership
Gets things done, deadlines, problem solving, step by step
Goal Path Theory
directive, supportive, participative and achievement oriented
Situational Leadership
coaching, pacesetting, democratic, affiliative and authoritative
Stages of Group Development
Majority of Group Development Models share the notion that most groups will…
Require a period for getting to know members
Development strategies to relate with one another
Rework in the presence of challenge or stress
Experience loss of motivation, focus, productivity, and/or direction at some point
Resolve with an accepted conclusion
Tuckman’s Model & Stages
Stage 1 - Forming
Stage 2 - Storming
Stage 3 - Norming
Stage 4 - Performing
Stage 5 - Transforming, Reforming, Adjourning
Factors that Influence Group Development
Group & individual roles
Leadership style
Group goals
Group cohesiveness
Degree of assessment, planning & design
Group membership
Group norms
Responsibilities of Group Leaders
Listen and Respond
Giving and Receiving Feedback
Using Concrete Language
Challenging Clients Behavior or Actions
Self Disclosure
Meaning Attribution
Bridging
Reality Testing
Co-Leaders
allows one person to attend to the group task while the other manages the process
Model interpersonal relationship skills either as a part of the content or within the context of the group
Advantage during the processing of the group - they can both contribute their observations of the effectiveness of the plan and to identify and solve group issues
Must discuss aspects of leadership ahead of time, such as leadership styles, conflict management plans, primary therapeutic modes..etc
Effective Leaders help the group…
Come to a clear understanding of the goals
Be aware of procedures and norms
Understand the skills, talents and needs of its members
Develop methods to evaluate the groups progress
Learn to accept new ideas
Create new tasks and terminate outdated ones
1 - Introduction
Leader introduces the group name, purpose and general expectations with brief outline
Introductions as needed
Warm up activity - usually designed to prepare participants to participate in the activity of the day
These steps are repeated in every group, though they may change according to the kind of group or the members
It is good to build in ways to help people remember names and each other
This sets the mood for the group!
2 - Activity
The primary method, mode to meet the goals for that days groups
Activity analysis - plan for a just right challenge
Consider the amount of time allotted when planning
3 - Sharing
The process of considering the end product. If each person is doing something on their own, they might display it to other group members, or everyone steps back to consider the work they did
The process for sharing is largely dependent on the activity
4 - Processing
Members are given the opportunity (encouraged to!) speak about their experience with the group activity
This is primarily feelings based - and provides insight into some of the participant’s behaviors
Often skipped by new group leaders but very important
5 - Generalizing
The leader considers the participation and responses of the group members and pulls together some general take aways
If the group goes as planned, this will reflect the goals
6 - Application
Takes the key concept from the summary (generalizing), and helps the members apply them to their lives
Can have participants speak individually, or think, pair, share. (how you do this is planned)
7 - Summary/Wrap Up
Why Groups?
Groups require interpersonal learning
building social skills
networking and building peer relationships
Humanistic Approaches
Humanistic groups are about tapping into humanity and facilitating growth, self-development and healing through belonging and shared experience
Concepts of humanistic groups include respect, understanding, genuineness, spirituality and self actualization
The Recovery Model
Developmental Approaches
Paradigm
The developmental stage is part of personal context and inherent in every group
Cannot consider group activities without considering the developmental level of the group members
Levels are defined by points of growth, crisis or conflicts that need resolving
Several theorists - Levinson, Jung, Erikson
Considers motivation and a person’s natural desire for mastery
Includes group development
Psychodynamic
Ground in psychoanalytic theory that focuses on ego development and insight into the underlying processes behind behavior and thought
Relationship to OT Groups
Considered symbolic meaning of activity
Ex: gardening for people who are uncomfortable with being messy
Provision of activities that fit the person’s personality - or that help to alter the person’s personality if need be
Focused on the impact of unresolved childhood interpersonal issues that interfere with the person’s ability to derive pleasure from activity
Includes concepts of transference and object relations
Behavioral-Cognitive
Emphasis is on learning, practice and cognitive restructuring
Relationship to OT Groups
Behavioral goals and objectives
Conditioning and development of habits
Shaping and chaining
Rehearsal and practice
Modeling and reinforcement
Sensory Motor Approach
Include a range of Frames of References that address motor, sensory, perceptual or cognitive changes that are a result of developmental or acquired conditions affecting the brain
Incorporates concepts from many theorists including Trombly, Rood, the Bobaths, Ayres and Dunn
Neurology/Brain/Behavior
Stress the importance of sensation as well as practice and feedback in the approach - new FoRs incorporate a holistic approach - experiencing your body doing
Encompasses motor learning theory which emphasized the relationship between neuroplasticity, movement and development of new patterns of movement to accomplish desired tasks
Allen’s Cognitive Disabilities
Applied when there is need to measure and monitor problem solving ability and safety during performance tasks
Relationship to OT Groups
Designed to apply to daily function with a particular focus on available cognitive structure and process in daily tasks
Used in acute and long-term settings with people who have cognitive changes due to illness or injury
Quantifies ability and disability into categories and helps direct intervention to support of compensate
Ecology of Human Performance
Self determination model - adapting to changes in life
Ecology - the transaction between people and their contexts/environments
Four contexts - personal, cultural, temporal and virtual
Two environments - social and physical
Basic assumptions
Four constructs work together - person, task, context and performance
There is a dynamic relationship between person and task and contexts
Environment is a factor in performance
OT promotes self determination and inclusion
Environment and person are constantly changing, requiring adaptation
Independence is achieved when wants and needs are satisfied (adaptations inc)
Person-Environment-Occupation-Performance (PEOP)
Begins with the PEO paradigm - assuming these are not separable
Performance - a dynamic experience of a person engaged in purposeful activities and tasks in the environment
4 step process
Narrative (Occupational Profile)
Assessment of occupational performance
Intervention - addressing performance barriers
Determining outcomes
Environments are considered part of performance (ex - cooking in the kitchen)
KAWA Model
You will only use this in groups if the group is a family!!!!!
Japanese Model of Occupational Engagement - Considers the aspects of Japanese culture (not held in western cultures)
Occupation is embedded in nature
Occupation is collective - families, social groups, work groups
Reason and reality are situational - problems can change depending on the situation
Ideas and opinions are accepted or rejected based on the hierarchy of individuals
River metaphor exemplifies this - every changing and complex intervention is multifactorial - with change being determined by the collective group, the environmental changes, not just individual needs
Model of Human Occupation
Based on the assumption that people are open systems that interact with their environment
That there are internal processes impacted by underlying anatomy and physiology as well as motivation, life experience and daily habits
There is a developmental process to create occupational identity and competence
Groups are a combination of education, engaging in processes and/or engaging in occupations of interest or value