1/20
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Common law
Judges decide how to apply existing law to resolve nuanced disputes
Till early 20th century, abortion is legal in 1st trimester in most states by judge’s decision
Statutory law
Legislatures create new legislation, overriding existing common law
Constitutional law
Legal meaning found by judges in the constitution, overrides other laws at state/federal level
Roe v. Wade
Us supreme court system
District court then Court of appeals to supreme court
Or state trial courts, intermediate appellate courts, then state supreme courts to US supreme court
Judges judicial powers
Legal interpretation
Judicial review
Lifetime appointment, under good behavior
How many justices
9
Process for nominating and confirmation of justices
Appointment: Executive branch determines who becomes a justice, congress then confirms it
Counter majoritarian difficulty
Founders distrusted justices as they weren’t elected, served for life, and might make decisions against public
How is judiciary the least dangerous branch (said by Hamilton)
It doesn’t have power of the sword (enforcement) or purse (funding)
Courts cant raise armies, control budgets, or make laws on their own
Only interpret and apply laws passed by others
Depends on other branches to enforce its ruling, influence comes from judgement and legitimacy, NOT direct power
Marbury v. Madison
Madison refused to deliver his commission
The start of all court judicial cases
History of judicial review
Power of courts to determine whether laws/government actions are constitutional
NOT directly in constitution, was established through marbury v. madison
Justice Marshall said its the duty of the judiciary to say what the law is
Election of 1800, Jefferson beats Adams then Adams packs the courts
Order is signed and sealed but Jefferson refuses to deliver letters, so Marbury doesnt get the job and sues for writ of mandamus
Marshall rules in Jeffersons favor by claiming the right to judicial review
Partisan control of the supreme court today
6-3 control by conservative justices (court)
Cant act proactively, only hear cases presented to them by others
Refusing to hear a case affirms or stays lower court decision
Reasoning of decisions usually is more important than ruling
Writ of certiorari
Rarely given, 4/9 justices required
Decisions to hear case
Stare decisis
Rarely given
SCOTUS sets precedent all other courts must follow
Only future SCOTUS may reserve
Conservative decision making
Textualism, fixed in written content
Literalism, meaning of words
Originalism, original understanding
Liberal decision making
Organicism: Meaning can be re interpreted in context of times
Active liberty decision making
Interpret in a way that maximizes liberty and minimizes encroachment by others
3 models for how judges make decisions
Legal
Attitudinal
Strategic
Legal model
Judges only decide cases based on legal merits of the case
Ex: Ruling on discrimination
Attitudinal model
Decide based on their personal beliefs
Strategic model
Decide based on grander strategic needs
Avoid defects, protect court reputation, and personal legacy