research methods test 1

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
call with kaiCall with Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/77

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

chapter 1-3

Last updated 12:35 AM on 2/3/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

78 Terms

1
New cards

Intuition

  • involves believing what feels true/instincts

    • problem: can be wrong due to cognitive and motivational biases rather than logical reasoning

2
New cards

authority

  • accepting new ideas based on authority figures state its true

    • eg: parents, media, doctor, profs, pastor

  • problem: authority may be incorrect

3
New cards

rationalism

  • using logic and reasoning to acquire new knowledge

  • eg: all swans are white therefore yk the swan is white

    • if the premises are wrong, the conclusion will not be valid

4
New cards

empiricism

  • acquiring knowledge through observation and experience

  • heart of the scientific method

  • we are limited in what we can experince and our senses can deceive us

5
New cards

the scientific method

  • method of systemically collecting and evaluating evidence to test ideas and answer questions

  • using systemic empiricism to make careful observations

    • under controlled conditions to test

6
New cards

science

The systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.

7
New cards

systematic empiricism

  • 1st part of the scientific approach

  • learning based on observation, and scientists learn about the natural world systematically, by carefully planning, making, recording, and analyzing observations of it.

8
New cards

empirical questions

  • 2nd feature of the scientific approach

  • questions about the way the world actually is and, therefore, can be answered by systematically observing it.


9
New cards

public knowledge

  • sharing conclusions in professional contexts eg. journal

  • advances science for social process

  • allows science to be self correcting

10
New cards

pseudoscience

  • Refers to activities and beliefs that are claimed to be scientific by their proponents—and may appear to be scientific at first glance—but are not.

  • lacks falsifiability, does not address empirical claims

eg: astrology, reflexology

11
New cards

falsifiable

the capacity of a hypothesis, theory, or statement to be proven wrong through observation, experimentation, or empirical evidence

12
New cards

3 goals of science

  • to describe

  • to predict (whether an event or behavior will occur in a certain situation)

  • to explain

13
New cards

basic research

  • achieving a more detailed and accurate understanding of human behavior, without necessarily trying to address any particular practical problem.

    • eg: how caffeine consumption affects the brain

14
New cards

applied research

  • conducted to address a practical problem

  • eg: cellphone use on driving → prompted by safety concerns

15
New cards

folk psychology

  • Intuitive beliefs about people’s behavior, thoughts, and feelings.

  • eg: the belief that venting anger helps reduce it, “People use only 10% of their brain power.”

16
New cards

heuristics

  • Mental shortcuts in forming and maintaining our beliefs.

17
New cards

conformation bias

Tendency to focus on cases that confirm our intuitive beliefs and to disregard cases that disconfirm our beliefs.


18
New cards

skepticism

  • Pausing to consider alternatives and to search for evidence—especially systematically collected empirical evidence—when there is enough at stake to justify doing so.

19
New cards

tolerance for uncertainty

Accepting that there are many things that we simply do not know.

20
New cards

empirical research reports

Research reports that describe one or more new empirical studies conducted by the authors.

21
New cards

review articles

Articles that summarize previously published research on a topic and usually present new ways to organize or explain the results.

22
New cards

theoretical article

A review article that is devoted primarily to presenting a new theory.

23
New cards

meta analysis

A review article that provides a statistical summary of all of the previous results.

24
New cards

double-blind peer review

A process in which the reviewers of a research article do not know the identity of the researcher(s) and vice versa.

25
New cards

monograph

A coherent written presentation of a topic much like an extended review article written by a single author or a small group of authors.

26
New cards

edited volumes

Books that are collections of chapters written by different authors on different aspects of the same topic, and overseen by one or more editors.

27
New cards

intrestingness

How interesting the question is to people generally or the scientific community.

  • Three things need to be considered: Is the answer in doubt, fills a gap in research literature, and has important practical implications.


28
New cards

Feasibility

How likely is the research question going to be successfully answered depending on the amount of time, money, equipment and materials, technical knowledge and skill, and access to research participants there will be.


29
New cards

theory

A coherent explanation or interpretation of one or more phenomena.

h

30
New cards

hypothesis

A specific prediction about a new phenomenon that should be observed if a particular theory is accurate.


31
New cards

hypothetico-deductive method

  • A cyclical process of theory development, starting with an observed phenomenon,

  • hen developing or using a theory to make a specific prediction of what should happen if that theory is correct,

  • testing that prediction,

  • refining the theory in light of the findings, and using that refined theory to develop new hypotheses, and so on.

<ul><li><p>A cyclical process of theory development, starting with an observed phenomenon, </p></li><li><p>hen developing or using a theory to make a specific prediction of what should happen if that theory is correct,</p></li><li><p> testing that prediction,</p></li><li><p> refining the theory in light of the findings, and using that refined theory to develop new hypotheses, and so on.</p><p></p></li></ul><p></p>
32
New cards

good hypothesis

  • testable and falsifiable → must be possible to gather evidence that will disconfirm it

  • logical

  • positive statement about the existence of a relationship or effect

33
New cards

variable

A quantity or quality that varies across people or situations.

34
New cards

quantative variable

A quantity, such as height, that is typically measured by assigning a number to each individual.

35
New cards

catagoerical variable

A variable that represents a characteristic of an individual, such as chosen major, and is typically measured by assigning each individual's response to one of several categories (e.g., Psychology, English, Nursing, Engineering, etc.).

36
New cards

operational definition

A definition of the variable in terms of precisely how it is to be measured.

eg: beck depression inventory, roshchart inkblot

37
New cards

population

A large group of people about whom researchers in psychology are usually interested in drawing conclusions, and from whom the sample is drawn.

eg: children with autismm, all american teens, humans

38
New cards

sample

A smaller portion of the population the researcher would like to study.

39
New cards

simple random sampling

  • every member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample.

    • difficult or sometimes impossible for psychological research because the populations are less clearly defined

40
New cards

convenience sampling

  • A common method of non-probability sampling in which the sample consists of individuals who happen to be easily available and willing to participate (such as introductory psychology students).

    • sample may not be representative of population


41
New cards

experimental method

  • only method used to find causal relationships

    • researchers must manipulate one or more variables while attempting to control extraneous variables

42
New cards

independent variable

The variable the experimenter manipulates.


43
New cards

dependent variable

The variable the experimenter measures (it is the presumed effect).

44
New cards

extraneous variables

Any variable other than the dependent and independent variable.

45
New cards

confounds

A specific type of extraneous variable that systematically varies along with the variables under investigation and therefore provides an alternative explanation for the results.

  • must be controlled

46
New cards

internal validity

  • Refers to the degree to which we can confidently infer a causal relationship between variables.

  • high internal validity in a lab

47
New cards

external validity

  • Refers to the degree to which we can generalize the findings to other circumstances or settings, like the real-world environment.

    • field studies are high in such

    • when internal validity is high, external validity tends to be low; and when internal validity is low, external validity tends to be high.

48
New cards


field experiments

A type of field study where an independent variable is manipulated in a natural setting and extraneous variables are controlled as much as possible.

  • can have high external and high internal validity

49
New cards

mode

most frequent score in a distribution

50
New cards

median

midpoint of distribution of scores

51
New cards

mean

average of distribution of scores

52
New cards

range

A measure of dispersion that measures the distance between the highest and lowest scores in a distribution.


53
New cards

standard deviation

Is the average distance between the scores and the mean in a distribution.


54
New cards

variance

A measurement of the average distance of scores from the mean.


55
New cards

correlation coefficient 

Describes the strength and direction of the relationship between two variables (often measured by Pearson's r).


56
New cards

inferential stats

A research method that allows researchers to draw conclusions or infer about a population based on data from a sample.

57
New cards

statistically signfifcant

An effect that is unlikely due to random chance and therefore likely represents a real effect in the population.

  • less than 5% chance of being due to random error=statistically significant

    • more than 5% due to chance of error alone= not statistically significant

58
New cards

type 1 error

  • (false positive)

  • when the null hypothesis is true, but is incorrectly rejected

  • said there is an effect when there is NO true effect in the population

    • eg: test says you have covid when in reality you DONT

59
New cards

type 2 error

  • (false negative)

  • when the null hypothesis is false, but the test fails to reject it

  • test says you have a flu when you DO have covid

60
New cards

ethics

The branch of philosophy that is concerned with morality—what it means to behave morally and how people can achieve that goal.

61
New cards

moral principles

  • weighing risks against benefits

  • acting responsibly and with integrity

  • seeking justice

  • respecting peoples rights and dignity

62
New cards

informed consent

researchers obtain and document people’s agreement to participate in a study after having informed them of everything that might reasonably be expected to affect their decision

63
New cards

Nuremberg Code

A set of 10 ethical principles for research written in 1947 in conjunction with the Nuremberg trials of Nazi physicians accused of war crimes against prisoners in concentration camps.


De

64
New cards

Declaration of Helsinki

An ethics code that was created by the World Medical Council in 1964.


65
New cards

Belmont Report

A set of federal guidelines written in 1978 as a response to the abuses of the Tuskegee study that recognize three important principles in research with humans: justice, respect for persons, and beneficience, and that formed the basis for federal regulations applied to research.

ju

66
New cards

justice

  • The importance of conducting research in a way that distributes risks and benefits fairly across different groups at the societal level.

    re

67
New cards

respect for persons

One of the Belmont report principles that emphasizes the need for participants to exercise autonomy and protection for those with reduced autonomy, often through informed consent.

68
New cards

beneficence

Underscores the importance of maximizing the benefits of research while minimizing harms to participants and society.

69
New cards

Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects

  • A set of laws based on the Belmont Report that apply to research conducted, supported, or regulated by the federal government.

70
New cards

an insitutional review board (IRB)

A committee that is responsible for reviewing research protocols for potential ethical problems.

71
New cards

Exempt research

  • low level risk

  • Research on the effectiveness of normal educational activities, the use of standard psychological measures and surveys of a non sensitive nature that are administered in a way that maintains confidentiality, and research using existing data from public sources.

72
New cards

Expedited research

Research reviewed by the IRB that is not anonymous and/or may involve potentially stigmatizing information, or invasive or uncomfortable procedures, but exposes participants to risks that are no greater than minimal risk (risks encountered by healthy people in daily life or during routine physical or psychological examinations).

73
New cards

greater than minimal risk research

Research that poses greater than minimal risk to participants and must be reviewed by the full board of IRB members.

74
New cards

APA ethics code

Stands for the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct.

  • It was first published in 1953 and includes about 150 specific ethical standards that psychologists and their students are expected to follow.

75
New cards

deception

Stands for the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. It was first published in 1953 and includes about 150 specific ethical standards that psychologists and their students are expected to follow.

76
New cards

debreifing

This is the process of informing research participants as soon as possible of the purpose of the study, revealing any deception, and correcting any other misconceptions they might have as a result of participating.

77
New cards

pre-screening

A way to minimize risks in a study and to identify and eliminate participants who are at high risk.

78
New cards