Week 1 - Building Blocks of Relationships

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/18

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 1:20 PM on 2/5/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

19 Terms

1
New cards

Baumeister and Leary (1995)

  • identified human beings’ '“need to belong”

  • “human beings have a fundamental need to form and maintain a minimum quantity of lasting, positive and significant interpersonal relationships”

2
New cards

evolutionary perspective on the need to belong (Hare, 2017)

  • early humans lived in small groups in a difficult environment

  • adaptions to be social and caring led to increases in survival likelihood allowing maturation and reproduction

3
New cards

overarching evidence for the need to belong

  • relationships are easy to form and difficult to break

  • without close connections, we suffer

  • our need to belong can be satiated

  • the need to belong is universal

4
New cards

evidence for relationships being easy to form and difficult to break

  • babies instantly form attachments (Bowlby)

  • we experience great difficulty in ending relationships

5
New cards

evidence for a lack of close connections causing suffering

  • rejection hurts: pain, reduced wellbeing, intellectual functioning

  • lack of social network is a strong predictor of illness and mortality

  • social connection can be a matter of life or death

  • it is particularly important that relationships are high quality/satisfying

<ul><li><p>rejection hurts: pain, reduced wellbeing, intellectual functioning</p></li><li><p>lack of social network is a strong predictor of illness and mortality</p></li><li><p>social connection can be a matter of life or death</p></li><li><p>it is particularly important that relationships are high quality/satisfying </p></li></ul><p></p>
6
New cards

relationships and mortality

  • people in happy relationships were more likely to survive 48 months after experiencing a heart attack

<ul><li><p>people in happy relationships were more likely to survive 48 months after experiencing a heart attack</p></li></ul><p></p>
7
New cards

evidence for the satiation of the need to belong

  • we have a limited number of friends (approx. 6 friends in college - Wheeler & Nezlek, 1977)

  • people spend less time with friends when in a romantic relationship

  • connection with a new romantic partner reduces attachment to a previous partner

8
New cards

evidence for the need to belong being universal

  • reviewed evidence does not seem to be culture specific

9
New cards

who are our attachment figures?

  • people are most likely to say that their romantic partner is their primary attachment figure and least likely to say their father

<ul><li><p>people are most likely to say that their romantic partner is their primary attachment figure and least likely to say their father </p></li></ul><p></p>
10
New cards

what is attachment?

  • an intimate emotional bond to particular individual who is seen as providing protection, comfort, and support

  • attachment system - form bonds with others, become distressed if they are unavailable

  • evolutionary function of attachment system - keep caregivers close to infants

11
New cards

normative (secure) attachment processes

  • proximity maintenance - staying near and resisting separations

  • secure base - using attachment figure as a base from which to engage in non-attachment behaviour

  • safe haven - turning to an attachment figure for comfort, support, and reassurance

12
New cards

individual differences in attachment

  • learn in early childhood what to expect from others

  • develop beliefs and expectations about others (whether they will be responsive to needs) and the self (whether we are worthy of love

  • these beliefs influence thoughts feelings and behaviour in relationships

13
New cards

attachment in adulthood

  • similarities in primary attachment functions (proximity-seking, safe haven, secure base)

  • differences in infant and adult attachment (mutuality in care, psychological proximity, sexuality)

14
New cards

attachment orientations (Fraley et al., 2011)

  • low vs high anxiety

  • low vs high avoidance

<ul><li><p>low vs high anxiety</p></li><li><p>low vs high avoidance</p></li></ul><p></p>
15
New cards

describe secure attachment

  • low anxiety and low avoidance

  • learned that proximity seeking leads to support, protection and relied of distress

  • turn to others when distressed

  • believe distress is manageable

  • more stable and satisfying relationships

16
New cards

describe dismissive-avoidant attachment

  • low anxiety and high avoidance

  • value self-reliance and independence

  • avoid seeking support when distressed

  • expect relationship failure/aversion to commitment

  • lack of intimacy

  • higher levels of attraction when interacting with potential partners

  • report feeling a sense of relief after break-ups

17
New cards

describe anxious-preoccupied attachment

  • high anxiety and low avoidance

  • hypervigilant about loss and rejection

  • excessive reliance on others when distressed

  • demanding of closeness, attention, and approval

  • intrusive, demanding and overly disclosing

  • hard time getting over break ups

18
New cards

describe fearful-avoidant attachment

  • high anxiety and high avoidance

  • hypersensitive to potential hurt and rejection

  • withdraws when upset; avoids coping

  • relatively poor personal and social adjustment

  • difficulty expressing feelings

19
New cards

stability of attachment style

  • early researchers claimed attachment style originates in early life and shapes relationships from “cradle to grave”

  • evidence shows stability of attachment style over time

  • but new experiences matter (break-ups vs new, good relationships)

  • become more secure with age (Chopik et al., 2019)