1/23
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Example of an eruption & Characteristics
1815 Tambora
Phreatomagmatic eruption
40 km plume and fountaining
Incandescent flows
Darkness & cold for 2 days
tsunami & pyroclastic flow
Global phenomena observed by Tambora
colored sunsets
persistent dry fog
high stratospheric sulfate aerosol veil
year without summer
Tambora eruption & eruope
coldest summer based on tree ring studies > led to short growing seasons
temperature anamolies of tambora
effects were not felt the same everywhere, more days than normal are way colder than normal
optical depths?
gets worse within the first half year after the eruption (oppenheimer 2003)
sulfate concentrations in ice cores
spikes prior to tambora, point to equatorial eruption
may explain why global temperatures were lower than usual before the tambora eruption
Southern hemisphere?
showed weaker signs of climate effects because of large oceans and land distribution (prevents major anomalies)
why did the winter after become normal?
because the cooling at the surface is accompanied by heating in the stratosphere
What happens when you put more sulphur dioxide into the stratosphere
you warm up the stratosphere and that increases the latitude thermal gradient
what was warming also caused by?
north atlantic oscillation
Context of tambora eruptuon
largest known event in the past two millenia
similar sized eruptions about 1 per 1000 yr
Samalas volcanic eruption
sulfur in ice cores 2x tambora, but less evidence of global climate change
petrological based, released 2-3x SO2 than humans per year
effects of the salmas eruption in europe
cold, incadessant rainfall & high cloudiness > crop failures
persisten dust veil ‘dark year’
what does tree ring data show
extreme average surface cooling in 1259
What did & did not add up about the Samalas eruption?
Wester europe strong cooling, warmer-than average conditions over alaska and northern canada > not hemisphere wide cooling ( Guiliet S et al., 2017)
linear thinking
the bigger the eruption, the bigger the effect (not true)
Overall global climate impacts
(1) global aerosol veil > cooling/
(2) total CO2 release is less than anthropogenic
atmospheric CO2 reduced
Fe fertilization of oceans & phytoplankton blooms > slowed down biological pump
diffuse sunlight that promotes photosynthesis
stratospheric volcanic aerosols act as
catalysts for reactions between chlorine, nitrate, and chlorine gas > destroys ozon layer
what can multiple sulfer-rich euptions within years or decades cause
additive impact, possible little ice age
Proximal and direct hazards
pyroclastic flow, thick pumice and ash, disruption of air traffic
hazard has not changed, but the risk has increased
population growth
no longer self-sufficient
just in time supply chains
technological dependency
food and agriculture
thick ash in major cities impacts energy and transport (delays in electrical power grids)
agriculture is global (vulnerable to volcanic disruptions everywhere)
VEI eruptions since 1970
loss of 70% of wild animal biomass
atmospheric CO2 has increased
ecological footprint is increasing