1/31
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
augustine background
4/5th century
pessimistic with a focus on human failure
‘city of god’ vs ‘city of men’
believed that humans weren’t perfect and that we could thus never achieve salvation
first person to come up with orginal sin
concupisence
the idea that our natural perfected state has been wounded so we are bad and are always inclinging towards sin
predestination
the idea that god chooses and guides some people to salvation
agustine on gensis 2-3
god creates humans in his likeness (image)
human beings are made by god so are good however we also have free will (this is symbolised by the tree in gensis)
humans live in garden of eden and had a close relationship with god
perfect harmony with living things and god walked amoung them
the human body, will and reason were all in perfect harmony
links to plato’s chariot to explain the constant battle between reason and will
humanity pre fall
adam and eve competely obedient to god
world was gods creation and perfect
humans live in harmony with all of creation
equailty and tranquility
will is pure and controlled by reason
humans have a close and intimate relationship with god
sinless
had everything they needed
humanity post the fall
pain and suffering entered the world
eve punished with lust and subordination to adam, defining post-male and female relationships
concipisence
humans and animals become enimies
became aware of good and evil
corruption of will
loose their relationship with god
orginal sin catholic church quote
it is a sin ‘contracted’ and not committed a state not an act’
post capsaicin world
effects of adams sin can be seen through a continuous state of rebellion
can be felt everywhere, e.g a lack of sexual control
lack of control which the soul has over sin
orginal sin
‘sin came into the world through man’ st paul
ontological condition of human existance not just a description of our actions
no one can be truly good they still appear in the characteristcs of OG sin, double death and transmission
double death
the first death is adams rebellion which kills the relationship between humans and god - symbolised through adam and eves awareness of their nakedness infront of god
the second death is the mortal state of every human - ‘form dust you are and to dust you will return
transmission of sin
chain of disasters
adams children have his rebellious nature as conspience is passed down through generations as being sexually transmitted
‘that orginal perversion a kind of corruption at the root
effects on human socities
before the fall humainty had friendship and leadership was gentle
post fall due to the corrupt nature of humans authoirty and control was needed over them for example slavery
society needs earthly peace, and to attain this the church is aviable to guide people
strengths of augustine on OG SIN
sexual desires play a large part of human life
RCC humans are divided and need help of god to develop
corresponds with experiences of life
freud and libido
palagian belief is optimistic (human effort can bring perfection) so Augustine allows hope for gods grace
body, will and reason can be at tension with one another
weaknesses of augustine on orginal sin
literal interpretation and unfair to be tainted from an act from so long ago
no space for humans to develop morally
evolution implies we are moving towards perfection
Dawkins - negative approach which has led to human suffering and an empahsis on sexualty
paul tillich - religious language is ment to be interpreted symbolically
Dawkins - irrational and dangerous, absurd to think that corruption of all of humainty relies on only two individuls
satre - creare our own nature
OG sin - view on women
‘women not created in gods image but destroyed it’
eve was the one who encouraged adam to sin, this thus became an achritype for all women
note- augustine was obsessed with sex in his youth so could he shifting his guilt onto women
thomas hobbes
‘human life is solitary, poor, nasty and brutish and short’
natural state of a human is bad and society thus saves us making us more civilised
Jacques rosseau
‘man is born free and everywhere he is in chains’
it is society and civilsation which has messed human nature up - we are all born naturally good
augustine disagree with both… both fail to recognise the importance of the turing point of the fall
gods grace
is gods generious, undeserving and free act of love for the world - expressed ultimately through the sacrafice of jesus
augustine on gods grace
our free will is limited due to conscipence
cannot choose right or wrong options thus we need gods grace to guide us
some people are elected to go to heaven
dont deserve it but it is the only thing which can save people from hell
summun bomum → the highest amount of goodness which is the trait of god
pessismistic view in human nature
we are tainted from the mintue we are born
little opportunity for humainty to develop
concupience is too strong
no truly free beings
optimistic view on human nature
gods grace is undeserving
JC sacarfice on the cross
church - provides support for christains on their journey
faith directs towards the summun bomum
RCC ‘happy fault of adam’
strengths and weakness of gods grace
s- optomistic outlook
s- summun bomum
s - gods grace allows for JC who bridged the gap between humans and god
w- misuse of gods grace
w- why did we need JC if god was always going to forgive us ]
w- evolution arg
augustine vs pelagius
pelagius felt as if agustines views were leading to immoral behaviour
RCC upholds augustine - so pro infant baptism
pelagius believed that it was possible to lead to moral life
modern undestanding - evolution
not literally true the events in bible
A VS P human nature
A→ damaged by fall, sinful
P→ cant have a flawed nature if we can be holy
A VS P sin
a → we are inncapable of avioding sin humans have a tendency away from goodness
p → humans dont have to sin, its freely choosen ; humans can be good
A VS P guilt and og sin
a → fall transmits guilt, humans are sinful from birth
p → we are responsible for our own sin
A VS P death
a → consqeunce of sin
p → biological nessisaty
A VS P grace
a → humans cannot do a good deed its all gods grace
p→ assists people to think right, but humans carry out the actions so are responsible
A VS P salvation
a→ free and a gift from god, which he rewards how he chooses too
p→ humans use there own free will to choose god (down plays grace)
A VS P suffering
a→ deserved
p → makes god seem arbitary for punishing the innocent
A VS P. god
a → benevolecne through grace, not his fault there is evil
p→ unjust for god to condem those for something which they cannot help
A VS P jesus
a → expression of gods grace
p → good people before the new testimated before jc bought salvation