1/36
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
5 aims of punishment
Retribution, Rehabilitation, Deterrence, Public Protection, Reparations
Retribution
society demands a just punishment for the crime committed
Rehabilitation
reforms offender behaviour
Deterrence
discourages others and individuals from future offending
Public Protection
Protecting the public from the offenders
Reparations
Payment for the harm caused by the crime
Why does society punish those who have committed a crime?
To discipline, deter, reform, protect and repay
Just Desert - Retribution
Criminals deserve what they are given as punishments as they have gone against social morals
Proportionality - Retribution
punishment should fit the crime they commit
Supporting Theory - Retribution
Right Realist Theory, Rational Choice Theory
Rational Choice Link to Retribution
assumation of conscious decision to commit crime and therefore are fully responsible and must suffer consequences
Retribution Evaluation - Forgiveness
Offenders deserve forgiveness, mercy or a chance to make amends
Retribution Evaluation - does it get better?
punishment is still inflicted even if nothing good comes from it
Rehabilitation examples
education programmes, anger management courses, drug therapy and testing, support
Supporting Theory - Rehabilitation
Individualistic Theories
Individualistic Theories (rehab)
Cognitive, Eysenck Personality, Skinner Operant Learning, Sociological Theory
Rehabilitation Evaluation - Right Realism
only has limited success, in that many reoffend even after going through the programmes
Rehabilitation Evaluation - Marxists
rehabilitation programmes shift responsibility of offending to the individual rather than on how capitalism leads to crime
Individual Deterrence
punishment of the offender is presumed to keep that person from committing other crimes in the future
General Deterrence
punishment of criminals that is intended to be an example to the general public and to discourage offenses
Severity VS Certainty (deterrence)
however severe the punishment might be, if there is little chance of being caught and convicted, it will not likely deter other potential offenders
Supporting Theory - Deterrence
Right Realism theories such as rational choice, situational crime prevention strategies and social learning theory
Rational Choice Link to Deterrence
Individuals make their own decisions to commit crimes and therefore can be deterred from this
Situational Crime Prevention Strategies Link to Deterrence
Harder to commit an offence so acts as a deterrent
Social Learning Theory Link to Deterrence
Relevant to understanding general deterrence. IF would be offenders see a model being punished for offending they are less likely to imitate that behaviour
Deterrence Criticism - little evidence
bootcamps and sharp shocks do not reduce youth offending
Deterrence Criticism - reoffending rates
1/2 all prisoners reoffend in the first year of release
Deterrence Criticism - severity
How can we decide how severe a punishment needs to be before it is a deterrent?
Deterrence Criticism - consequences
assumes offenders know that their actions have consequences
Deterrence Criticism - rational choice
Crimes of passion are not rational
Public Protection - Imprisonment
Putting offenders away helps to keep them away from the public
Examples of public protection
Foreign travel bans, curfews, tagging, execution, chemical castration, incapacitation
Public Protection Supporting Theory
Biological Theories and Right Realism
Biological theory link to Public Protection
Lombrosso argues criminals are biologically different from the population, sometimes favours things such as chemical castration
Right Realism link to Public Protection
incapacitation is a way of protection against crime. Persistent offenders responsible for majority crimes significantly reduces rates
Public Protection Criticism - Incapacitation
incapacitation leads to longer sentences and LT warehousing of offenders with little hope of release. Leads to rising prison population and more costs
Public Protection Criticism - risk managment
Incapacitation does not deal with the causes of crime or to change offenders