Foundational Documents/Cases (Need to update)

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/21

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No study sessions yet.

22 Terms

1
New cards

Federalist 51

  • Each branch of government will keep each other in check and prevent a single one from becoming too powerful

  • Federal judges should not be appointed by the public to ensure judicial impartiality and protecting them from political pressure

  • A large republic helps protect minority rights by making it difficult for a majority oppression

2
New cards

Federalist 70

  • Strong, energetic, effective president is necessary for a good govt

  • Ensures accountability, effectiveness, and quick decision-making during war

  • A small, plural executive is more likely to abuse power than a single executive

3
New cards

Federalist 78

  • Judges should serve for life tenure during “good behavior”

  • Life long tenure protects against abuses of govt power and ensures law is being administered correctly

  • Any law that violates the Constitution is void

  • Power of people is superior to that of the judicial and legislative branch

4
New cards

Unitary Executive Theory

  • Theory arguing that all executive power should be vested solely in the President

  • President should have completely control over entire executive branch w/o interference from Congress
    - Supporters: Ensures accountability and transparency
    - Critics: Weakens checks + balances

5
New cards

McDonald v. Chicago

  • Otis McDonald was barred from obtaining a handgun b/c of state law

  • SCOTUS ruled that 2nd Amendment (bear arms) is incorporated to the states through the 14th Amendment’s due process clause

  • Established the principle of selective incorporation (constitutional protections are applicable to state govt, not just federal)

6
New cards

Schenck v. US

  • Charles Schenck distributed pamphlets to men, encouraging them to resist the military draft for the WW11

  • He was arrested and convicted of violating the Espionage Act (cannot interfere with war efforts)

  • SCOTUS upheld his conviction, establishing the “clear and present danger” test to determine limits of free speech during wartime

  • First Amendment can be restricted during emergencies

7
New cards

Tinker v. Des Moines

  • Students in 1965 wear black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War and were suspended

  • SCOTUS ruled in favor of the students (armbands were symbolic, so protected by 1st Amendment), establishing the “substantial disruption” test

  • Students’ freedom of speech (1st Amendment) can’t be limited unless it will “substantially disrupt” school operation

8
New cards

NY Times v. US

  • NYT released the Pentagon Papers to the public in their newspapers

  • Nixon administration sought a court order to stop the NYT from publishing the documents, citing national security concerns

  • SCOTUS ruled in favor of NYT, stating that government action can only prohibit speech before it takes place, not after

  • Govt must show that the publication will cause “immediate and irreparable” damage/danger to the nation

9
New cards

Wisconsin v. Yoder

  • Amish parents refused to send children to public schools after 8th grade, believing that it would exposed them to contradictory world views/ideas

  • SCOTUS ruled in favor of the Amish, stating that the 1st Amendment (free exercise clause) is applied to the states through the 14th Amendment

  • Reasoned that a person’s free exercise of religion outweighs state’s interest in school attendance (“compelling state interest”)

  • Forcing Amish to send their children to school would disrupt centuries old traditions and religious doctrine

10
New cards

Engel v. Vitale

  • Group of parents sued school board, arguing school prayer violated Establishment Clause (1st Amendment)

  • School argued it was constitutional b/c it was voluntary prayer

  • SCOTUS ruled that promotion of school prayer violated the Establishment Clause and was unconstitutional

11
New cards

Gideon v. Wainwright

  • Clarence Gideon (only had 8th grade education) was arrested and at his trial, he requested for a court-appointed lawyer but judge refused his request

  • Judge said that the 6th Amendment (right to counsel) did not apply to the states and only in federal courts

  • SCOTUS applied the due process clause to “incorporate” the 6th Amendment to states

  • States are required to provide counsel for defendants in all cases

12
New cards

Mapp v. Ohio

  • Dollree Mapp was arrested after police illegally searched through her car trunk, finding “lewd” books and pictures (they were searching for bombs and gambling material)

  • SCOTUS used the due process cause to “incorporate” the Fourth Amendment (no unreasonable searches/seizures)

  • The 4th Amendment now protects against illegal searches and seizures at both the state and federal level

13
New cards

Miranda v. Arizona

  • Ernesto Miranda was arrested and charged but was never informed of his right to remain silent and to an attorney (he eventually signed a written confession)

  • Prosecutors used his conviction to convict him

  • SCOTUS ruled in favor of Miranda by ruling that the Fifth Amendment protects self-incrimination at state and federal levels

  • Established the Miranda Rights

14
New cards

Letter from Birmingham Jail

  • MLK stated that unjust laws are worth breaking but just laws are to follow

  • White moderates are worse than outright racists b/c they prefer order over justice

  • African Americans have been told throughout history to “wait”, but they cannot wait anymore

  • The church is wrong for remaining silent; they should be a moral leader

15
New cards

Brown v. Board of Education

  • Black children were denied admission to white public schools

  • SCOTUS challenged the “separate but equal” doctrine of Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

  • Ruled that separate schools were inherently unequal and created a sense of inferiority

  • Used strict scrutiny to rule segregation unconstitutional

  • Applied equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment

16
New cards

McCulloch v. Maryland

17
New cards

US v. Lopez

18
New cards

Articles of Confederation

19
New cards

Declaration of Independence

20
New cards

Brutus #1

21
New cards

Federalist 10

22
New cards