Social Psychology: Group Bias, Stereotypes, and Intergroup Relations

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/31

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

32 Terms

1
New cards

social categorization

The automatic process of sorting people into groups ("us" vs. "them") based on characteristics like race, age, gender, or any perceived similarity.

2
New cards

Taylor, Fiske, Etcoff and Ruderman (1978)

Participants watched a mixed-race or mixed-gender group discussion; they confused who said what far more often within the outgroup than the ingroup, providing early evidence for the outgroup homogeneity effect.

3
New cards

outgroup homogeneity

Tendency to see outgroup members as more similar to each other ("all alike") than ingroup members.

4
New cards

stereotype

Fixed, oversimplified belief about the typical characteristics or behaviors of a social group.

5
New cards

Bogus Pipeline Procedure

Research technique using a fake lie-detector; participants believe it reveals true attitudes, so they report more honest (often more prejudiced) responses than on normal surveys.

6
New cards

implicit association test (IAT)

Reaction-time test measuring automatic stereotypes by how quickly people pair group faces (e.g., Black/White) with positive or negative words.

7
New cards

Steele and Aronson's (1995)

Black and White students took a hard verbal test; when described as diagnostic of ability (activating stereotype threat), Black participants underperformed Whites; when framed as non-diagnostic, the racial gap disappeared - first major evidence of stereotype threat.

8
New cards

stereotype threat

Anxiety from fear of confirming a negative stereotype about one's group, which impairs performance in the stereotyped domain.

9
New cards

ingroup favoritism

Preferring or giving better treatment/resources to members of one's own group, even without hostility toward outgroups.

10
New cards

Tajfel, Billig, Bundy, & Flament (1971)

Schoolboys randomly assigned to trivial groups (e.g., Klee vs. Kandinsky preference) gave more rewards to anonymous ingroup members and maximized ingroup advantage - showed mere categorization is enough to produce ingroup favoritism (Minimal Group Paradigm).

11
New cards

black sheep effect

Judging badly-behaving ingroup members more harshly than identical outgroup members to protect the ingroup's image.

12
New cards

Authoritarianism

Personality trait (Right-Wing Authoritarianism, RWA) marked by submission to authority, hostility toward outgroups, and strong adherence to conventional norms.

13
New cards

Social dominance orientation

Personality preference for group-based hierarchies and belief that some groups should dominate others.

14
New cards

Sechrist and Stangor (2001)

White students told most peers held negative stereotypes about Black people later showed stronger anti-Black implicit bias and recalled more negative information - demonstrated perceived social norms shape personal prejudice.

15
New cards

Czopp, Monteith and Mark (2007)

When confronted about a racist remark, people reacted more defensively to outgroup confronters than ingroup confronters; ingroup confrontations produced more guilt and behavior change - showed source of confrontation matters.

16
New cards

contact hypothesis

Prejudice reduces when ingroup and outgroup members interact under conditions of equal status, common goals, cooperation, and institutional support (Allport, 1954).

17
New cards

jigsaw classroom

Cooperative learning method where each student has a unique piece of information needed for group success; promotes interdependence and reduces prejudice (Aronson et al.).

18
New cards

extended contact hypothesis

Knowing an ingroup member has a close outgroup friend can reduce one's own prejudice through indirect contact.

19
New cards

Robbers' Cave Experiment

Boys at camp divided into two groups developed hostility through competition; superordinate goals (tasks only solvable together) dramatically reduced conflict - classic support for realistic group conflict theory and common ingroup identity solutions (Sherif et al., 1961).

20
New cards

common ingroup identity

Recategorizing separate groups into one larger shared identity ("we're all campers/humans") to reduce intergroup bias.

21
New cards

realistic group conflict

Intergroup hostility arising from actual competition over limited resources (money, jobs, status).

22
New cards

social conventional morality and harm-based morality

Conventional morality = rules based on social norms/traditions; harm-based morality = rules based on preventing harm. Discrimination is more acceptable when framed as convention than harm.

23
New cards

distributive fairness

Perceived fairness of how outcomes or rewards are actually allocated among people.

24
New cards

procedural fairness

Perceived fairness of the processes and rules used to make decisions.

25
New cards

False consciousness

Disadvantaged group members unknowingly accept ideologies that justify and maintain their own subordination.

26
New cards

Social creativity

Low-status groups cope by finding new comparison dimensions on which they excel ("we may be poor but we're more moral").

27
New cards

Collective action

Coordinated efforts by members of a disadvantaged group to improve their collective status or conditions.

28
New cards

Harvesting/Commons dilemma

Social dilemma where individuals over-use a shared limited resource (e.g., overfishing) because personal gain outweighs collective cost.

29
New cards

Contributions dilemma

Social dilemma (public goods) where individuals under-contribute to a shared resource because they can free-ride on others' efforts.

30
New cards

prisoner's dilemma game

Two-player game where mutual cooperation gives the best joint outcome, but self-interest tempts defection, usually leading to mutual loss.

31
New cards

Utz (2004)

Online social dilemma experiments showed that communication and salient group identity dramatically increased cooperation in prisoner's dilemma and commons dilemma games, even in virtual settings.

32
New cards

dual concern model of cooperation and competition

Cooperation depends on two concerns: (1) concern for one's own outcomes and (2) concern for the other party's outcomes; high concern for both leads to cooperation.

Explore top flashcards