1/221
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Epidemiology term given by
John M Last
Epidemiology define
FDDC
study of Frequency Distribution Determinants & application of knowledge for disease PREVENTION & CONTROL
Disease distribution means?
Time , place , person of distribution of disease
TPP
In rate is N part of D
Yes
Rate = time
1k, 10k or 1lac
In ratio is N part of D
No
Ratio= comparison
In Proportion, is N part of D
Yes
Part of whole = proportion
Always 100
Incidence formula
New cases / population at risk x 1000
Incidence is RATE, COHORT
Prevalence formula
Existing cases / total population x 100
Prevalence is PROPORTION, CROSS SECTIONAL
Descriptive study (buzz word)
Distribution
Analytical study buzz word
Determinant
What is field trials
Vaccine trials
Done on: HEALTHY PEOPLE
What is community trials
Preventive trials
Formulation of hypothesis is ?
Descriptive epidemiology
Test of hypothesis is
Analytical epidemiology
Confirmation of hypothesis is
experimental & interventional epidemiology
Ecological study is for
Population (correlation, geographic , aggregate)
New disease with unknown cause is reported, which study would u do
1st : Descriptive study
Cohort is which type of epidemiological study?
Analytical
Cohort = analysis
“Matching” is the buzz word for ?
Case control
Rare exposure : which study?
Cohort
Rare diseases : which study?
Case control
Study done at same point of time
Cross sectional
Exposed vs non exposed study
Cohort
Diseases vs non diseased study
Case control
“Follow up” is the buzz word for
COHORT
Study that analyses cause to effect
Cohort
Largest prospective study
Framingham heart study
3 generations of study
Hill’s criteria is for which study?
Cohort
Advantages of cohort
TMID
TEMPORALITY (cause proceeds effect)
Multiple outcomes (CVD, ca, etc)
Incidence calculation
Direct RR
Rare exposures
Minimal BIAS (eg , recall bias)
Hawthorne bias (cohort)
Subjects modify behaviour
Eg: quit smoking in between
Hawww chod dia
Attrition bias (cohort)
Loss to follow up
Ambispective cohort
Both retrospective and prospective study
Advantages of retrospective cohort
Save time and money
No attrition bias ( loss to follow up)
No Hawthorne bias (changed behaviour)
What is longitudinal study
Outcomes are looked at fixed time intervals (eg: every6months)
Ensuing meaning
In coming up…
Ensuing years upcoming yrs
RR, attributable risk, PAR
These belong to which study
Cohort
Relative risk formula
incidence(exposed)/ incidence (non exposed)
RR = a/(a+b) ÷ c/(c+d)
RR >1, =1, <1
>1 - positive association (risk)
=1 - no effect
<1 - negative association (protective)
attributable risk meaning
AR= 75%
75% of lung cancers are attributed to smoking
EPIDEMIOLOGIST : use it
Population attributable risk (PAR)
“If we REMOVE exposure → how much disease reduces?”
PAR=90%
If smoking is stopped , 90% reduction in annual incidence of lung cancer cases in the population
Used by: POLICY MAKERS
community physicians / epidemiologists use which risk,
Attributable risk
Policy makers use which risk ?
PAR
Incidence of disease in exposed vs incidence of disease in non exposed =
Relative risk (cohort study)
Buzz words for CASE CONTROL STUDY
matching
Opposite of cohort
Trohoc = case control
How many controls can be taken for 1 case in case control study
Max 4
1:1 is also ok
Advantage of matching
Eliminates all the confounders of the study
Example of case control study
Dolls & Hills study
Bias in case control study
Recall bias
Measure of strength of association of case control study?
ODDS RATIO/ CROSS-PRODUCT RATIO
Formula = ad/bc
Odds ratio and RR relationship
OR provides an estimate of RR
Nested case control
Chota case control
Bada cohort
Chota study inside bada cohort
Nested case control features
Good for RARE INVESTIGATIONS
TEMPORALITY established (cause proceeds effect)
Saves MONEY and TIME
Study of biological precursors of a disease
Nested case control study avoids which problem as compared to a case control study?
TEMPORALITY
Cross sectional study buzz words
Snapshot (same time)
PREVALENCE : used for descriptive purposes
Biggest disadvantage of CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY
cannot establish TEMPORALITY
(Snap se kaise pata chalega ki cause kya h snap ka ?)
Screening test / health camp is which type of study
Cross sectional ( same time p snapshot)
Ecological study aka?
Correlation study
Geographical study
Population study
Aggregate study
Buzz words for ecological study
Country wise
State wise
Unit
2° data
Which type of study is used for nutritional services ?
Ecological (nutrition — sabka —- population)
Biggest problem in ecological studies
Ecological fallacy ( cannot apply population data on individuals)
We generalise the outcomes of a population on individuals which might not be correct !
High meat consumption —> colorectal cancer higher in those countries
But people having colorectal cancer may not be eating meat
Which graph is used to express ecological studies
Scatter diagram
Concept of hospice care is to give supportive care to
Final phase of terminally ill patient
Web of causation of disease helps to?
Suggest ways to interrupt the risk of transmission
Epidemiological ratio
DALY (CDs) / DALY (NCDs)
Summary of epidemiological studies . Is called ? Is it qualitative or quantitative study?
Systematic review
Qualitative only
Does NOT include quantitative synthesis of data of all studies available
Summary of a study + Mathematical analysis (quantitative) = ?
Meta analysis
Meta = Math
All meta analysis is based on systematic review but .
But all SR ≠ meta-analysis
Steps of systematic review
DSS ESI
Define ques
Search study
Select study
Extract data
Synthesise data
Interpret
funnel plot
Shows combined effect of SR & MA
Checks for PUBLICATION BIAS **
File drawer effect (funnel plot)
Dots NOT uniformly distributed = publication bias +
No file drawer effect (funnel plot)
Dots uniformly scattered = no publication bias (study publish na hona)
Funnel straight = no bias
Tilted = bias
Other name of forest plot
Blobbogram
ONLY made for META ANALYSIS (MA)
Only MA FOREST m BUBBLEGUM khila skti h
How to interpret forest plot
If CI crosses 1 → ❌ Not significant
👉 If CI does NOT cross 1 → ✅ Significant
>1 = risk factor
<1 = protective factor
What does DIAMOND mean in forest plot
Overall estimate / pool estimate
Diamond = final ans
Reporting guideline of : case report
CARE
Care = case report
Reporting guideline of : RCT
CONSORT
Consort = RCT
Reporting guidelines of : observational studies (case control , cohort , cross sectional
STROBE
Strobe = study observational
Reporting guidelines of META analysis
MOOSE
MOST IMPORTANT!!
Reporting guideline of : systematic review + MA
PRISMA
PRISMA = pooled studies
Father of evidence based medicine
David sackett
Gold std of evidence based medicine
Meta analysis
Founder of evidence based medicine
Gordon guyat
Founder guyat
Father sackett
Hill’s criteria gold std study
Meta Analysis
Most imp criteria in hills criteria
TEMPORALITY
(Cause to effect)
Least imp criteria in hills criteria
Specificity (one exposure , one outcome )
(Smoking only leads to lung cancer)
Give examples of strength of association?
RR= cohort
OR= case control
Case series
Collection of case report
Acupuncture in children w chronic headache study
Hills criteria is used to
Establish CASUALITY ( proving that this factor causes the disease , not just associated with it)
Random in randomization = ?
Equal and known chance
Intention to treat analysis is done in?
RCT
Major purpose of random assignment in a clinical trial ?
Ensure that study grps are COMPARABLE on baseline characteristics (eliminates selection bias)
Double blind = ?
Both observer & observed grp is blind
Best study design to establish CAUSALITY (cause→effect)
Non concurrent cohort ( retrospective cohort)
Co founder = ?
Linked to both exposure and disease
Eg: LIGHTER (linked to both smoking and lung cancer ) but independent risk factor h
Effect modifier = ?
If a person is exercising, effect of smoking on lung cancer reduces
A variable that (positively or negatively) modifies the observed effect of a risk factor on a disease status
Techniques to eliminate confounders
RANDOM = removes all
MATCHING = removes small
Which technique removes known and unknown confounders
Randomisation (best)
What is restriction in observational studies ?
Limit the study to one category . Eg: only males
matching
Case control
Eliminates ONLY KNOWN confounders