1/9
learning to learn
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Pashler et al (2008)?
reviewed controlled studies and found no reliable evidence that matching interactions to learning styles improves learning
people do not remember more when material is delivered in their preferred sensory mode
Dunlosky et al (2013)- reviewing learning techniques?
low utility- summarisation, highlighting, re-reading, key word mnemonic
moderate utility- elaborative interrogation, interleaved practice
high utility- practice testing, distributed practice
summarisation?
Breezing and Kulhavy (1979)- low utility
pps learned a 2000 word essay using different study strategies and were tested immediately or after a 1 week delay
best performance: summarisation and note taking groups
worst performance: a letter search group
highlighting/ underlining?
Peterson (1991)- low utility
students read a textbook chapter
underlining group vs control group, completed a MCQ 2 months later containing factual and inference questions
no difference in factual, but underlining impaired recall for inference questions
re-reading?
Karpicke et al (2009)- low utility
84% of students said they re-read their notes
re-reading was the top rated strategy and provides some benefit when spaced but not massed
Rothkopf (1968)- low utility
students read a passage 0, 1, 2 or 4 times (self-paced, massed)
after 10 minutes they completed a fill in the blank test
performance increased with number of readings
keyword mnemonic?
low utility strategy
use key words and mental images to connect new information to something familiar
imagery can improve memory by promoting deeper, more elaborative encoding but not all concepts are keyword/imagery friendly
elaborative interrogation?
Pressley et al (1987)- moderate utility
undergraduates read simple factual sentences and were assigned to one condition: elaborative interrogation, provided explanation, or read-only
results after a cued-recall test: elaborative interrogation > provided explanation > read-only
Woloshyn et al (1992)- moderate utility
Canadian and German students learned facts about Canadian provinces and German states
elaborative interrogation produced larger benefits in the domain where students had higher prior knowledge
interleaved practice?
moderate utility strategy
mixing different types of problems or materials within a single study session
interleaving naturally spaces repetitions of the same concept
produces large boosts in learning
practice testing?
Karpicke and Roediger (2008)- high utility
undergraduates learned Swahili-English word pairs
study-only vs test-only group
final recall was much higher for the test-only group (80%) than study group (36%)
distributed practice?
high utility strategy
spacing study over time
spacing effect: spaced practice is more effective than massed practice
lag effect: longer gaps between sessions often improve retention more than shorter gaps