1/3
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
List 3 positives of the law surrounding psychiatric harm.
1) law distinguishes between primary & secondary victims
Ensures only those ho suffered genuine loss can recover
Provides legal clarity and predictability
2) clear criteria for secondary victims (list)
Helps prevent fraudulent claims and limits liability
3) decision making is fair
White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire
4) flexibility / compassion emerging
NHS trust v walter
Re v NHS foundation trust
List 3 negatives of the law surrounding psychiatric harm.
1) law doesn’t reflect modern understandings of mental health
Requirement for sudden shock doesn’t recognise trauma can be gradual
2) ‘close tie of love and affection’ is narrow and outdated
Doesn't account for unmarried partners or close friends
3) Witness event with own unaided senses = problematic in a digital age
People can witness traumatic events via live footage / social media
Taylor v A Novo
NHS foundation trust v Ronyane
Give 2 reforms linked to psychiatric harm.
1998: Law Commission proposed reforms to make law more inclusive
Removed requirement for sudden shock
Allowing claims based on indirect witness of traumatic events
Broader recognition of relationships
Have the reforms been implemented?
No