Guide to Logic: Conditions and Arguments

studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 44

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.

45 Terms

1

Necessary condition

Something that must be true for another statement to be true.

New cards
2

Example of necessary condition

Having a valid driver's license is a necessary condition for legally driving a car.

New cards
3

Sufficient condition

Guarantees the truth of another statement.

New cards
4

Example of sufficient condition

Being a square is a sufficient condition for being a rectangle, as all squares meet the criteria for rectangles.

New cards
5

Conditional statements

Statements that include an antecedent and a consequent.

New cards
6

Antecedent

The 'if' part of a conditional statement, representing the condition or premise.

New cards
7

Consequent

The 'then' part of a conditional statement, representing the outcome or result that follows from the antecedent.

New cards
8

Logical reasoning

A process where a condition can be both necessary and sufficient, meaning the presence of one guarantees the presence of the other, and vice versa.

New cards
9

If and only if

A phrase often used in logical statements to express that a condition is both necessary and sufficient.

New cards
10

Modus Ponens

A form of argument where, given a conditional statement 'If A, then B' (A → B), and the affirmation of A, one can conclude B.

New cards
11

Example of Modus Ponens

If it is stated that 'If it rains, the ground will be wet,' and it is raining, then one can conclude that the ground is wet.

New cards
12

Modus Tollens

Involves a conditional statement 'If A, then B' (A → B), but instead of affirming A, it denies B to conclude the negation of A.

New cards
13

Example of Modus Tollens

If 'If it rains, the ground will be wet' is true, and the ground is not wet, then one can conclude that it did not rain.

New cards
14

Affirming the Consequent

Occurs when one argues from the premises 'If A, then B' and 'B' to the conclusion 'A.' This form of reasoning is invalid.

New cards
15

Example of Affirming the Consequent

'If John is a bachelor, then he is male. John is male. Therefore, John is a bachelor' is a fallacy because being male does not necessarily mean John is a bachelor.

New cards
16

Denying the Antecedent

Involves arguing from the premises 'If A, then B' and 'not-A' to the conclusion 'not-B.' This reasoning is invalid.

New cards
17

Example of Denying the Antecedent

'If Othello is a bachelor, then he is male. Othello is not a bachelor. Therefore, Othello is not male' is a fallacy because not being a bachelor does not mean Othello is not male.

New cards
18

Deductive Arguments

These are arguments where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true.

New cards
19

Example of Deductive Argument

In a syllogism, if 'All men are mortal' and 'Socrates is a man,' then 'Socrates is mortal' is a deductive conclusion.

New cards
20

Inductive Arguments

Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations. The conclusions of inductive arguments are probable rather than certain.

New cards
21

Example of Inductive Argument

Observing that the sun has risen every day in recorded history leads to the inductive conclusion that it will rise again tomorrow.

New cards
22

Indicative Conditionals

Deal with real or probable situations.

New cards
23

Subjunctive Conditionals

Address hypothetical or unreal scenarios.

New cards
24

Indicative Conditionals

Used to describe situations that are factual or likely to happen.

New cards
25

Subjunctive Conditionals

Used to express hypothetical, unreal, or wished-for situations.

New cards
26

Logical Conjunction (∧)

Represents logical conjunction, meaning 'and.' It is used to combine two propositions that are both true.

New cards
27

Logical Disjunction (∨)

Represents logical disjunction, meaning 'or.' It signifies that at least one of the propositions is true.

New cards
28

Negation (¬ or ~)

Denotes negation, meaning 'not.' It is used to invert the truth value of a proposition.

New cards
29

Implication (→ or ⊃)

Represents implication, meaning 'if...then.' It indicates that if the first proposition is true, then the second one is also true.

New cards
30

Biconditional (↔ or ≡)

Denotes biconditional, meaning 'if and only if.' It signifies that both propositions are either true or false together.

New cards
31

Universal Quantifier (∀)

The universal quantifier, meaning 'for all.' It is used to indicate that a proposition applies to all elements in a domain.

New cards
32

Existential Quantifier (∃)

The existential quantifier, meaning 'there exists.' It indicates that there is at least one element in the domain for which the proposition is true.

New cards
33

Conjunction

A conjunction (and) is true if both propositions are true.

New cards
34

Disjunction

A disjunction (or) is true if at least one proposition is true.

New cards
35

Negation

Negation (not) inverts the truth value of a proposition, making a true proposition false and vice versa.

New cards
36

Conditional Statement

A conditional statement (if...then) is true unless a true proposition leads to a false one.

New cards
37

Biconditional

A biconditional (if and only if) is true when both propositions have the same truth value.

New cards
38

Implication

This is a relationship where one proposition logically follows from another.

New cards
39

Material Implication

Material implication (if A, then B) is true except when A is true and B is false.

New cards
40

Strict Implication

Strict implication considers the meanings of propositions, not just their truth values.

New cards
41

Logical Equivalence

Propositions can be equivalent if they always have the same truth value.

New cards
42

Square of Opposition

The square of opposition illustrates relationships like contrariety and contradiction, where propositions cannot both be true or false simultaneously.

New cards
43

Fallacy

In logic, erroneous reasoning that has the appearance of soundness.

New cards
44

Reductio ad Absurdum

A logical argument technique used to refute a proposition by demonstrating that its denial leads to a contradiction or an absurd conclusion.

New cards
45

Indirect Proof

This form of argument is also known as indirect proof or reductio ad impossibile.

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 344 people
752 days ago
5.0(2)
note Note
studied byStudied by 5 people
815 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 138 people
970 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 16 people
691 days ago
5.0(2)
note Note
studied byStudied by 35 people
861 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 16 people
720 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 31 people
521 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 15 people
741 days ago
5.0(2)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard (33)
studied byStudied by 9 people
757 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (20)
studied byStudied by 4 people
543 days ago
5.0(3)
flashcards Flashcard (22)
studied byStudied by 57 people
708 days ago
4.5(2)
flashcards Flashcard (50)
studied byStudied by 5 people
554 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (42)
studied byStudied by 12 people
485 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (33)
studied byStudied by 1 person
694 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (31)
studied byStudied by 23 people
780 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (54)
studied byStudied by 18568 people
709 days ago
4.5(362)
robot