Lecture 36 - Critical Appraisal of Studies that Measure Patients' Experience

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/11

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

12 Terms

1
New cards

what is the JAMA user’s guide to using articles that measure patient reported outcomes

  1. is the measurement of health-related quality of life important

  2. is the study valid

  3. what are the results? - how can we interpret the scores

  4. how can I apply the results to patient care

2
New cards

what are qualities of a well done study design assessing health status

clearly defined research question relating to health status

appropriate instrument for measuring health status

psychometric properties

definition and validation of the minimal important difference

sample size

use of allocation concealment and blinding

3
New cards

how should a trial assessing health status define their research question

pre-specify that change in health status is a primary (/co-primary) outcome

state conceptual and measurement model

define what is being measured and why, which domains are being assessed

hypothesize magnitude and direction of the treatment and induced change

4
New cards

what is face validity

the extent to which an instrument appears to be measuring what it intends to measure

5
New cards

what is content validity

the extent to which all relevant concepts or dimensions of health status important to patients are comprehensively sampled by the items and domains in the instrument

6
New cards

what is construct validity

the extent to which the responses to items correlate, as logic would dictate, with values obtained for the same patient using other commonly used clinical measures (i.e. does the instrument relate to other measures the way it should?)

7
New cards

what is reliability

the extent to which the instrument yields the same (or highly correlated) scores on repeated applications to the same stable patients

8
New cards

what is responsiveness

the ability of the instrument to detect differences in scores over time in individuals who have changed with respect to the concept being measured

9
New cards

what is precision

the extent to which an instrument is free of random error

10
New cards

what is reproducibility

for instruments scored by clinicians, intra-rater and inter-rate reliability should be high

11
New cards

what is internal consistency

different items within a single domain are homogenous or cohesive in their responses, suggesting measurement of aspects that of a single attribute or construct

12
New cards

what is interpretability

the extent to which easily understood meaning can be assigned to an instrument scores