1/9
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Asia-Pacific: Regardless of what the U.S. ought to be doing, what policies does the U.S. have with China? What conditions have caused us to choose these policies? How do our dealings with China shape our relations with other states in the Asia-Pacific?
(Please discuss chapter 10.)
Rise of China as a major power and regional economic growth
2011: passed Japan as the world’s second largest economy
improved relations with Russia after decades of tensions
China’s military and reach are growing
Most populous country
Strategy
containment
the internal changes needed to make China less of a threat and more of a democracy are more likely to occur if the country’s external ambitions are contained and the flaws in its domestic system are exposed
second Bush administration
engagement
wary but not as threatening: diplomacy and negotiations
integration and diplomacy to provide structures, peaceful mechanisms for dealing with China’s own concerns
options other than economic sanctions preferred
Clinton administration
obama
initially- emphasize and expand engagement
some containment elements were accueted
more assertive in regional diplomacy
“pivot” was due to increase in US military deployments in Asia
trump
shift from soft diplomacy to hard power and tougher rhetoric
trade war
protectionism
biden
sent more signal direct against China’s actions
banned products over human rights abuses
US China relations
Taiwan
Nixon and Kissinger established “one China” policy
Clinton administration
China targeted missile tests close to Taiwain
GW Bush
selling arms to Taiwan
Pro-independence sentiments in Taiwan
Chinese military
increasing military spending
modernizing forces
increased capabilities: military use of space and cyber warfare
Pentagon: inconsistent with declaratory statements
Hedging: mixing containment and engagement
East Asian-Pacific regional security
China-Japan relations
fishing rights and islands
regional disputes over claims in the South china Sea
US working with Philippines and Vietnam to push back against Chinese assertiveness
strengthen smaller countries but don’t antagonize
North Korea
close allies with China
nuclear proliferation threat (cooperation and differences of interests)
economic relations
first Bush- prioritized Power over principles (economic sanctions)
Clinton- stopped short of sanctions but criticized bush for not promoting democracy
trade grown exponentially
renewable energy technologies
china principal purchaser of Treasury bonds
trade with china replaced japan
principles
resisting transition to democracy
corruption
human rights
influences on other regions
promoting strong Japan counterbalances china
Middle East: What are the main U.S. objectives for the Middle East? How do our policies illustrate the pursuit of those objectives? What conditions have caused us to choose these policies?
(Please discuss chapter 11.)
Three objectives in tension
supporting Israel
Gaza war
December 2008 (transition Bush-Obama)
relations were tense
counter-terrorism
Post 9/11
defining issue for GW Bush
advantage is with the attacker
Afghanistan
initially, Taliban quickly fell
infiltration of enemy areas
“failed to diminish the threat to the US
obama
removal of troops
strategy no less tough
respectful of Muslim beliefs: bridge misunderstandings
integrated diplomatic, political, economic and other instruments
mix of change and continuity
Principles and power-Bush
Communications
new Arabic-language radio station
access to oil
three competing regional powers
Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Iran
Iran
developing nuclear weapons in violation of nonproliferation treaty
coercive diplomacy, military strikes and grand bargaining
Moving to a regional unipolarity under Israel
Global oil trade
declining but relevant OPEC, dangerous sea lanes, government controlled revenues
persistence of Middle Eastern dictatorship
The Jewish/Evangelical Pro-Israel lobby in the US
Europe and Russia: What is the nature of U.S.-Russian relationship today? What are the key ways in which U.S. relations with Europeans have changed since the end of the Cold War? What are the conditions that have shaped each of these relationships?
(Please discuss chapter 12.)
decline of Russia and end of cold war bipolarity
integration of the EU, complicated by Brexit
US and EU eachother’s largest trade parterners
continuing trade tries with Europe, focused on the Atlantic Eastern side of the US
democracy and the prospect of backsliding in Europe
Poland
Hungary
bureaucratic politics and the desire to stay focused on Europe
Nature of U.S. Russian relationship
NATO created in response to Soviet enemy
foreign aid to Russia and other ex-Soviet states in the 1990s
democratization initiatives
food aid
medical and health care aid
Nuclear arms controls
Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (HW Bush)
cooperative threat reduction
remaining nuclear weapons
terrorism
work together against a re-radicalized afghanistan
presidents
clinton- split between friend and competitor
Bush- competitor
Obama- working together )worked together on nuclear arms control and Iran but not Syria
today
adversarial
Russia’s actions in Ukraine
sanctions, military deterrence and diplomatic pressure
limited oppennes to dialoge
Russia’s growing military cooperation with chine
not total isolation
trump spoke with Putin in Alaska in August
Trump agrees to a Ukrainian goal
Putin talks to Trump
Trump agrees to a Russian goal
Western leaders talk to Trump
U.S European relations
political and economic partner
NATO and EU expansion brought former Eastern bloc countries into Western institutions
tension over Iraq, defense spending and trade
2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine
EU
debt problems
Ireland/Greece. (2009)
euro crisis
conditions shaping relationships
Russian aggression, nuclear competition, and Moscow’s alignment with China drive US policy toward deterrence plus cautious engagement
European integration, globalization, and new global threats reshaped US-European ties into more blanced but still interdependent partnership
Latin America: What are the main objectives of U.S. policy in Latin America? How do our policies illustrate the pursuit of those objectives? What conditions have caused us to choose these policies?
(Please discuss chapter 13.)
Main objectives
the imbalance of power
opening US immigration to Latin America in 1965
Latino communities, small businesses, and white working-class rage
the US southwest as political battleground
military dictatorship, tariffs, and restricted foreign investment in Latin America in the 1960s and 1970s gives way to democracy and open trade in the 1980s
Free trade agreements
NAFTA- USMCA
the legacy of anti-communism: cuba and nicaragua
embargo on cuba
Cuban American lobby argue ending the embargo will strengthen the Castro government and it will not guarantee an ease in levels of cuban repression
embargo hurting civilians more than the regime
prevents americans from reaping the benefits of trade with and investment in cuba
the drug trade: the role of globalization and fragile states
Colombia (Clinton Administration and continued by Bush)
aid to government
Mexico (Merida initiative)
training and support to Mexico against cartels
drones
support for democracy
foreign aid
Obama & Guatemala for human rights abuses
initiatives by NGOs
Sanctions against authoritarian regimes (Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua)
election monitoring, diplomatic pressure
dealing with immigration concerns
Safe Third Country Agreements
extensions of US border
turned away
Border enforcement cooperation with Mexico
Temporary Protected status for migrants from unstable countries
Reagan’s amnesty of 1986 (anyone before 1982 forgiven)
History
Monroe Doctrine
Americas closed to European colonization and intervention
Roosevelt corollary
provide stability, order and prosperity to neighboring countries
military intervention in Mexico, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Panama
“Good Neighbor Policy”
cooperation with latin america
Anti-communist efforts during the cold War
Lessened dependence of Latin American economies on the US
Conditions
democratic backsliding
economic crises, corruption and violence
shared borders
interconnected economies
long history of US involvement has created expectations and obligations to remain engaged
textbook: lax gun control and societal habits
Africa: what are the main challenges that economic and political development in sub-Saharan African countries poses for the U.S.? What policies might the U.S. adopt or has the U.S. adoptedto help in these challenges?
(Please discuss chapter 14.)
US attitudes to Africa (imperialism or apathy)
retreat of the European empires: the U.S. as the lone great power until China
Besides natural resources, Africa is the continent least connected to the global economy
persistence of fragile states: Somalia, Ethiopia, Rwanda, Congo
legacy of corrupt dictatorships gives way to fragile democratization in the 1990s
future of demographic growth and divergent political paths
Main challenges
political instability
corruption
genocide
rwanda
Clinton administration didn’t act
UN and Europe didnt act either
ethnic conflict
somalia
US forces withdrawn by Clinton- starvation would spread or the risks and costs of the mission
suffers from weak governance and humanitarian crises amid food shortages, disease outbreaks, pervasive unemployment
Chinese-Influence
$15 billion in one decade
no pressure for human rights and democracy stipulations
democratization
South africa (success)
Nelson Mandela- anti apartheid
environment (textbook)
desertification and deforestation
climate change: rising sea levels
US foreign aid programs
Policies
Obama: Africa not after thought
tough love: development depends on good governance
Bush: tied US foreign aid to good governance practices
foreign aid
programs for rule of law, anticorruption, elections, civil society, and governance
technical assitance and training for greater agricultural productivity, improved sanitation, literacy and education, women’s empowerment
HIV/AIDS
George W Bush received credit for combating global AIDS
AGOA
The Africa Growth and Opportunity Act
trade preferences for African countries that reform their economies consistent with free-market principles
stimulated investment, trade, and job creation in sectors like apparel, agriculture and mining
The international system: What position does the U.S. have in the distribution of power today? Is the U.S. in decline or does it maintain a strong lead? Are we in a unipolar, bipolar, or multipolar world? What do these conditions mean for U.S. foreign policy today?
(Discuss, Lieber, Ikenberry, and/or Kupchan’s essays in the textbook in your answer)
Major powers
USA
China
Russia
Viewpoints
Lieber: US power is not declining. Steps need to be taken to ensure the maintenance of power and prosperity
Kupchan: The West is declining. Western values are not in the same primary position that they once were. China, India, Russia, and Brazil are emerging
Ikenberry: Liberal internationalism is a multilateral framework of rules and institutions promoting democracy and markets. This is changing, but the US has to decide if it is willing to sacrfice some power to work in a multilateral framework
Power
no single way of “measuring” power
relative
Polarity
Unipolar systems rarely last for long
bipolar systems produce two tight alliance systems and are more stable
multipolar systems produce loose and flexible alliances and are less stable
multipolar
cold war- bi polar
unipolar: post cold war
china rising pole
Europe, India, and Russia act as regional powers
US remains strongest pole
Foreign policy
alliances and coalitions to balance China and Russia
containing russia
countering Chinese influence
promote norms such as democratic governence, open markets and rule of law
manage conflicts (Taiwan, Ukraine) without escalation
Pennsylvania Avenue diplomacy: Pick two examples of decisions to use military force (or not to use force in one or two cases). Compare and contrast how the institutional powers of the president and Congress, the role of the political parties, and the role of public opinion are the
same or different across the two cases
(Discuss chapters 3 and/or 9.)
four shared powers
war powers
president is the commander-in-chief of the military
congress can raise and maintain a military. only the congress has the power to declare war
War powers resolution of 1973
presidents must inform Congress within 48 hours after the deployment of troops
after 60 (or 90) days Congress may cut off the operation’s funding if it does not declare war or a resolution
treaty-making
The president negotiates all treaties with states we recognize
The Senate ratifies treaties with a ⅔ vote
appointment powers
The president appoints all ambassadors to over 190 states
Senate must give majority approval to appointment of all ambassadors
commercial powers
The Constitution grants Congress the ultimate authority on trade. Both houses of Congress must pass laws on international commerce witha simple majority
Afghan war 2001: overwhelming bipartisan support from Congress
public opinion: in support
everyone was unified in counter terrorism efforts
most consensual since pearl harbor
united states had been attacked
public eventually turned against the war - Obama scaled back troops
Iraq War 2003: Congress voted in favor, but later public opinion soured and democrats took congress in 2006
intense and directly in the field (media)
Congress voted in favor by smaller margins
all republicans and most democrats
context of terrorism
WMD
exploited fear of being “soft”
included congressional leaders
criticism for “rushing to war”
deceptive and manipulative
two approaches
structural: the politics of Presidential-Congressional relations are rooted in the institutional rivalry of the two branches
partisan: the politics is rooted in the rivalry of the two major parties
Two views of presidential power
The “shared powers” view
The presidency and Congress are separate institutions that share power
A president’s power depends on relations with four audiences:
The majority party in Congress
Public approval
Bureaucratic responsiveness
Relations with foreign leaders
The “unilateral” presidency
Over time, the presidency has become the dominant branch with power to act alone
The presidency has advantages in acting unilaterally:
“First-mover” advantage
Executive orders
Bureaucratic expertise
Successive presidents have added to the power of the presidency, limited in growth only by checks and balances
Bureaucratic politics: Pick two examples of bureaucratic politics discussed in class and/or the textbook. Compare and contrast how bureaucratic politics worked to yield conflict or consensus in policymaking.
(Discuss relevant readings in chapter 2 and 9, or Allison’s essay.)
my chosen question to not study
Lobbying: What were some of the “old,” original games of lobbying that influenced foreign policy? What are some new changes to the way lobbying influences foreign policy?
(Note chapters 3 and/or 9.)
Lobbying games
Players
Economic interests
identity groups
political (civic, issue-oriented) groups
state and local governments
foreign governments
Kinds of issue politics
regulatory politics: about laws and regulations. the costs of the policy are concentrated in a few people, but the benefits are diffuse (spread out) across a lot of people
distributive politics: often about paying for targeted programs. the benefits of the policy are concentrated in a few, but the costs are diffuse across a lot of people
redistributive politics: transfers money from some to others. the costs are applied to specified groups and the benefits go to other specified groups
Old lobbying game (trade politics)
comparative advantage: a country can produce a product more cheaply than other products (US computers vs US textiles)
focusing on comparative advantage increases production and consumption. free-market economists argue that trade is good for growth
but the less cost-effective businesses will lose profits, capital, and labor due to trade, and lobby for protection
trade politics as distributive politics
the businesses and their workers protected from foreign competition —> concentrated benefits
normally consumers pay the higher prices —> diffuse costs
Old lobbying game (military-industrial complex)
defense industries, the Pentagon, and key committees in Congress would form mutually supportive relations resulting in an “iron triangle” dominating defense spending policy
defense spending is distributive politics
the new lobbying game
the rise of the “counter terrorism complex”
the rise of identity group lobbying: the “Israel lobby” and the “Cuba lobby”
the rise of NGOs and globalization issues
“information politics”
symbolic politics
leverage politics
accountability politics
issue networks instead of iron triangles
Grand strategy: What is grand strategy? What are the main sections of chapters 7 and 8 about? Which of these sections is most important for a grand strategy today and why?
Objectives
power
unilateral vs. multilateral
unipolarity post cold war
terrorism deterrence
hegemony
nuclear deterrence
cybersecurity
peace
WMD non-proliferation
UN
ICC
NGOs
Regional organizations
preventative diplomacy
prosperity
foreign aid
globalization
international finance
global public health
international trade
principle
democratic peace
democracy promotion
free press
genocide
human rights
grand strategy
an overall plan or organizing principle of how foreign policy should address the current and future global situation
priorities certain key objectives
identifies the means to achieve these objectives
provides a holistic vision for a variety of policies
guides policy into the long term
example of grand strategy
nixon and kissinger
focus on stabilizing relations and balanc9ing against the Soviet Union
arms control
engagement with China
withdraw from vietnam, but support south vietnamese forces
secretly expand the bombing of communist forces near vietnam
most important
promotion of democracy
democratic backsliding
cybersecurity
multilaterism
international trade
preventative democracy