Inventory of Earth’s Biota
Identification and Communication: Nomenclature
Orderly, Logical Sequence of Classification
Demonstrate Evolutionary Implications of Biodiversity
descriptive, colorful
easy to remember
only names for most people
one species can have many common names
one common name = same for more than one species
names can be confusing
most plants dont have a common name
all species need names
uniform system on naming = avoid confusion
facilitates information - retrieval
duplicate name
discovered by two different people around the same time
every species name must be linked to a herbarium specimen
type species sets “the standard” of the species = holotype
find a binomial not taken (Genus + epithet)
make type specimen and deposit at herbarium
latin / english description of new species
publish in journal or visible paper product
THIS MAKES IT VALID not directly accepted
descriptive term
label that associates species w a certain group
name based on nomenclatural types (genus type etc)
only one accepted name for a taxonomic group
names must be treated as latin but a lot of latitude
nomenclature based on rule priority
independant from zoological nomenclature
habitat is an essential character to naming (essentialism)
logical, efficient, easy, but rigid
theophrastus - 372-287 BC
herbalists-physicians - alphabetical or medicinal property for classification 15-16 centuries
1580-1800
lots of new plants coming in
Andrea Caesalpino
focus on flowers and fruits (reproductive parts)
John Ray
all parts of plant shoudl be used to classify
dicots and monocots
Pierre Magnol
families
Carolus Linnaeus
created the sexual system
carolus linnaeus
workable “natural” classification system
backward step to artificial
Species Plantarum (systema sexuale)
classification based on reproductive features
selective and features chosen a priori simply on workability
arranged as systema sexuale
1st level: number of stamens
2nd level: number of pistils
intense criticism ( johan siegesbeck )
more concerned w mechanics (usable, predictable…) = lots of issues
considered backwards bc it was artificial (mechanics of reproductive parts?)
an advancement bc focused on reproductive parts
linnaeus did good w cataloging but unrelated plants were being grouped
taxonomist reconsidered purpose of classification = look at older natural ideas
de Jussieu family created most complete natural classification
natural system came from taxonomic gardens
replanting @ Trianon Garden by grouping most similar looking
published Genera Plaantarum
1859 to publication of Origin of Species
to darwin natural meant that two species looked similar because they shared a features from a common ancestor
must include: genealogy + amount of change (similarity)
descent w modification = evolution
“common ancestry is a fact - the outcome is a phylogenetic tree
Ernst Haeckle publish the first TREE OF LIFE
1915 their system had phylogenetic flavor w simple plants listed first then more complex plants
standard in the early 20th century
simple (salix) = primitive
amentiderae = primitive
floral parts -
all present (ancestral state)
loss of parts (derived state)
Floral fusion
parts separate
parts fused
floral symmetry
actinomorphy
zygomorphy
ovary position
hypogynous
epigynous
AGP (angiosperm phylogeny group) uses DNA to establish relationships and morphology to ID groups
goal of groups is to include common ancestor and descents
some but not all descendants of a common ancestor are included
need revision
species derived from more than one ancestor
need revision
desiccation
UV radiation
temperature fluctuation
novel pathogens
pressure change
symbiosis between plant roots and fungi
represents ancestral state for land plants
mycorrhizae: between plant roots and fungi
help obtain nutrients in roots from the soil
help with water uptake
bacteria:
nitrogen fixing
alter soil temp. and moisture = impact heterotrophic respiration
Bryophytes don’t have vascular tissues ( xylem ) to help them transport water ( get thru leaves instead)
hydroids: water and mineral conducting specialized cells
leptoids: sugar-conducting specialize cells
haploid produces antheridia (male) and archegonia (female) bits.
these produce gametes via mitosis
two come together = fertilization of ovum via biflagellate sperm
fertilization results in diploid zygote that develops into a sporophyte
sporophyte is dependent on gametophyte
sporophytes produce haploid spores through meiosis
spores disperse and germinate into a protonema (baby gametophyte)
the hornworts
lack seta
simple thallus
lack gemmae
lack water conducting cells
stomata on both gametophyte and sporophyte (don’t close)
215 species
sugar conducting cells
only in moss family polytrichaceae
sporophyte stalk
absent in hornworts
the liveworts
nicholas marchant
gametophyte thalloid or leafy
lack stomata
7300 species
noble taxa = marchantia = very common = model system
the mosses
gametophyte a leafy shoot
stomata on sporophyte capsule
complex sporophyte capsule
Acrocarpous
upright w terminal sporangia (all upright)
unbranched
Pleurocarpous
produce their sporangia on short lateral branches or buds
prostrate - forming freely branches mats (sporophytes upright rest sideways)
complex sporophyte capsule
peristome = a ring of teeth surrounding the mouth of the capsule (teeth move in response to changes in humidity)
big boys
tallest self-supporting bryophhyte
first seedless plant to have genome sequenced
model system for evolution / genomics
Ulota
Macromitrium
a reproductive system of gymnosperms
hold the sporangia that produce the spores
cone like structure (kinda light brown / orange)
the spore-producing individual or phase in the life cycle of a plant having alternation of generations
a diploid phase in the life cycle
MEIOSIS produces spores diploid
stage of sexual reproduction process that produces HAPLOID gametes
MITOSIS produces egg and sperm haploid
male sex organs
diploid side
female sex organs
diploid
carbonniferous period
very wet period
water needed for fertilization of lycopod gametophytes
they had no protective coating