Legal Perspectives & Admissibility of Expert Testimony

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
full-widthOpen Podcast
GameKnowt Play
New
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/15

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

A comprehensive set of flashcards focused on legal principles, standards for expert testimony, and related concepts pertinent to admissibility and the role of judges and attorneys in the legal process.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

16 Terms

1
New cards

Expert Testimony

Testimony provided by someone with specialized knowledge to assist the jury or judge in understanding evidence or issues relevant to a case.

2
New cards

Gatekeeper

The role of the judge in determining the admissibility of evidence, including expert testimony, based on relevance and reliability.

3
New cards

Frye Standard

The legal standard that requires scientific evidence to be generally accepted in its relevant scientific community for admissibility.

4
New cards

Daubert Standard

A legal standard that expands criteria for admissibility of expert testimony beyond general acceptance to include testability, known error rates, and peer review.

5
New cards

Falsifiability

A criterion that a scientific theory must be able to be disproven through contradictory observable findings.

6
New cards

General Acceptance Test

A metric for admissibility which states that scientific evidence must be widely accepted in the scientific community to be admissible.

7
New cards

Known Error Rate

The frequency with which a scientific method produces inaccurate results, which must be disclosed to jurors where applicable.

8
New cards

Peer Review

The evaluation of scientific research by experts in the same field prior to publication, used as a criteria for admissibility of evidence.

9
New cards

Abuse of Discretion Standard

A legal standard used by appellate courts to review a trial judge's decision on admissibility, assessing whether the judge made an unreasonable choice.

10
New cards

Clinical Expectations

Standards for evaluating expert testimony that differ from general scientific testimony, focusing on factors like clinician examination and recognized clinical practices.

11
New cards

Adversarial Allegiance

The concern that experts may be biased due to their alignment with party interests in a legal case.

12
New cards

Testability

The ability of a scientific hypothesis to be tested and potentially disproven through evidence.

13
New cards

Expert Bias

The tendency of expert witnesses to present information that favors the party that hired them, raising concerns about objectivity.

14
New cards

Admissibility of Evidence

The legal criteria that determine whether evidence can be considered by the judge or jury during a trial.

15
New cards

Legal Relevance

The requirement that expert evidence must be related to the facts at issue in the case.

16
New cards

Independent and Impartial Expert

An expert who provides unbiased testimony and does not have conflicts of interest that could influence their opinions.