Define attachment
Close, two-way emotional bond
Each sees the other as essential for emotional security
How do you identify attachment
Proximity
Separation distress
Secure base behaviour
What are care-giver/infant interactions and why are they important
Form of communication between care-giver and infant
Helpful for infants social development, forms basis of attachment and influences attachment for life
What is reciprocity
Two-way process, each party responds to the signals and cues given by the other
What is interactional synchrony
CG and I reflect each others emotions and cue in co-ordinated manner
Mirror each other
Sensitivity hypothesis
Ainsworth theorised child’s attachment to PCG is based on how sensitive PCG is to infant’s needs
Studies into CG/I interactions
Meltzoff and Moore
Isabella et al.
CG/I
Meltzoff and Moore (1977)
Studied infants around 2 weeks old
Had adults display hand and facial gestures, babies were able to respond similarly
CG/I
Isabella et al. (1989)
30 mother and infant pairs
Assessed synchrony between pairs and measured their level of attachment
(HOW?)
Higher synchrony = Better attachment
Perceptions of fathers as CG
More of a playmate, more physically active and involved
Supporting role of the mother
Viewed as secondary attachment figures
Factors leading to difference in gender attachment
BIO
Testosterone = Increase playmate behaviour
Oxytocin = Attachment behaviours
Amygdala growth = Protective behaviour
Increase oxytocin and amygdala occurs in both parents
Factors leading to difference in gender attachment
SOCIAL
Fathers are more likely to be affected by their own experience
Internal working model
Gender socialisation, how we teach girls vs. boys
Social expectations of genders
IMPACTS OWN EXPERIENCE
Factors leading to difference in gender attachment
ECONOMIC
Being breadwinner is central to many men’s identities = impacts their ability to be CG
Encompasses socialisation
Increase in both parents working
Female led household & Same sex
Single-parent families don’t fare as well as others
Same-sex parents had no difference in developmental differences
Father’s importance is as an additional parent
SOCIAL SENSITIVITY
Studies for gender and attachment
Schaffer and Emerson
Field
Grossman
GaA
Schaffer and Emerson (1964)
(LONGITUDINAL STUDY)
Primary caregiver is more likely to be mother
Most babies had attached to mother by 7/8 months
75% of babies had attachment to father by 18 months
GaA
Field (1978)
Filmed 4 month old babies with PCG mum, PCG dad, SCG dad
PCG spent more time smiling at/with baby, imitating baby and holding baby
Responsiveness was key to attachment
GaA
Grossman (2002)
(LONGITUDINAL STUDY)
Father’s play style relates to his own internal working model
Quality of father + infant attachment related to quality of adolescent/teen attachments
SCHAFFER AND EMERSON
Procedure
Longitudinal study
1960’s Glasgow, working class
Mum and baby visited once a month until a year old, then once more when baby 18 months
Parents had to observe baby in different scenarios and keep a diary of observations
SCHAFFER AND EMERSON
Results
25-32 weeks : 50% babies showed separation towards a specific adult
Attachment to CG was to whichever was most sensitive to babies signals
40 weeks: 30% had formed multiple attachments
Identified stages of development
Asocial
Indiscriminate
Specific
Multiple
Asocial attachment
0-2 months
Similar response to ALL objects
Towards end, show preference to people
Indiscriminate attachment
2-7 months
Prefer familiar people (some strange anxiety)
Will accept comfort from any adult (no separation anxiety)
Specific attachment
7 months
Specific attachment to person, that person = PCG
Stranger anxiety AND separation anxiety
Multiple attachments
Months after specific developed
Display of attachment to other people, they are familiar with
SCHAFFER AND EMERSON
Conclusion
By 1 year old, most babies will have formed multiple attachments
SCHAFFER AND EMERSON
Supporting study
Meltzoff and Moore
Study babies and interactional synchrony
At 2 weeks, babies already show preference to humans over inanimate objects
When is animal testing allowed
When there is a tangible benefit for humans that outweighs the harm done to animalsWha
What is imprinting
Innate readiness to develop attachment within a critical period
What is sexual imprinting
Early imprinting can affect adult mating preferences
Choose same type that they imprinted on
LORENZ
When was his study
1935
LORENZ
Aims
Understand the predisposition to imprinting and attachment, especially in regards to critical period
LORENZ
Procedure
One clutch of geese eggs split into two
½ first saw him when hatch, ½ saw mother goose
Observed behaviour
LORENZ
Findings
Imprinting restricted to critical period, if it doesn’t occur then, won’t occur at all
Mixed geese together, followed who they imprinted on
Impacted sexual imprinting, geese that had imprinted on him had hard time mating with other geese
LORENZ
Eval POS
Ground-breaking research: Importance of critical period and imprinting behaviours
Aided development of human theories and research
Study style = natural and ecologically valid
LORENZ
Eval NEG
Cross-species = Can you apply a study on geese to human behaviour
Long-term ethical concerns
Simplistic interpretation of attachment and imprinting
Didn’t consider environmental variables, decided it was innate
HARLOW
When was study
1959
HARLOW
Aim
Understand behaviours in relation to comfort vs. food searching
HARLOW
Procedure
Cloth vs. wire (comfort vs. food)
16 monkeys
Stimuli given and observed monkey’s reaction
Scaring, placing empty rooms
HARLOW
Findings
Monkeys would go to the cloth mother for comfort, over the wire mother despite providing food
HARLOW
Follow-up
Observed them as adults
Social behaviours were abnormal, aggressive and unable to mate
Accounts of monkeys abusing partners and babies
HARLOW
Eval POS
Ground-breaking and theoretically important → influenced later human studies
Closer to humans than geese
Methodologically controlled
HARLOW
Eval NEG
Massive ethical concerns
External validity issues due to level of artificiality
Generalisability to humans = better than geese, but still not human
Cannot be sure on findings, interpretations of behaviour
Learning theory and attachment
Suggests that behaviour is learnt through classical conditioning and maintained through operant conditioning
Classical conditioning : terms
Unconditioned stimulus = Food
Neutral stimulus = Mother
Unconditioned response = Pleasure
US + NS = UR
Conditioned stimulus = Mother
Conditioned response = Pleasure
Classical conditioning : Process
Food (US) → Pleasure (UR)
Food (US) + Mother (NS) → Pleasure (UR)
Mother (CS) → Pleasure (CR)
What operant conditioning
Maintenance of learned behaviour through consequences
Pos reinforcement = Add pleasant stimulus to encourage behaviour
Sweet for every 3 flashcards learnt
Neg reinforcement = Remove unpleasant stimulus to encourage behaviour
Shortening revision time by 1 minute for every flashcard learnt
Operant conditioning : Process : POS
Baby cries → Baby gets food from mother → reinforces idea crying = food → baby repeats
Operant conditioning : Process : NEG
Baby cries → Mother feeds baby → Baby stops crying → Feeding takes away negative stimulus of baby crying → mother repeats behaviour
Theory of Drive reduction
When humans feel discomfort, drive is created to reduce the discomfort
Discomfort = Hunger, being fed = reduce discomfort
Being fed = Positive reinforcement to fussing etc. that gets baby fed
Key part of Bowlby’s monotropic theory
Adaptive / Evolutionary
Social releasers
Critical period / Continuity hypothesis
Monotropy
Internal Working Model
Monotropic theory : Adaptive
Evolutionary process that has allowed as to form attachment for a survival benefit
Monotropic theory: Social Releasers
Innate behaviours that encourage attention / caregiver behaviours
Physical: Big eyes, small nose and chin
Behavioural : Crying and cooing
Reciprocal process between CG and I
Monotropic theory : Critical period
Babies must form an attachment within a critical period otherwise they will struggle to form one later in life
Monotropic theory : Continuity hypothesis
A secure attachment as an infant = Child/ adult that is emotionally and socially secure later in life = Secure relationships as an adult
Monotropic theory : Monotropy
Between CG and I only, special relationship
Important to emotional development
Monotropic theory : Internal Working Model
Mental relationship that is formed with CG influences later relationship
Acts as template for future relationships