1/16
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Polsby 1967; The Theory of Democratic Elitism
power concentrated in hands of small privileged elite
oversimplification complexities
downplays citizen power
Garner and O’Riordan (1982); EIA in Context of Economic Recession
advocates for EIA into planning laws
critiques government preference for vague EN assessment
Advantages
consistency and fairness
early warning = reduced cost
democratic
Bond et al., (2004) Public Participation in EIA of Nuclear Plant Decomissioning projects
argues for integration of public consultation processes to avoid confusing public
importance of proactive approaches and decision-making transparent
employment important after participation - highlights EN features not only considered
Jay et al., (2007); EIA: Retrospect and Prospect
procedurally sound but substantively week
rationalist viewpoint
rarely changes decisions - helps planners justify decisions
indirect benefits - public awareness
substantive reform - sustainability targets, no net loss, natural capital framework
Wright et al., (2013)
lack of thorough research - rushed for deadlines
reliance on outdated information
UK department of energy and climate change - lack of scientific basis from ‘common-sense’ assumptions in habitat regulations from auditory disturbance
Bond et al., (2014)
streamlining EIA to reduce costs - expense of public participation
reduced expected benefits of EIA
Jha-Thakur (2016); 25 Years of EIA
Literature review
internal factors haven’t changed but external have
monitoring poor element, emphasis on pre-decision analysis
misinterpretation of EIA regulations
UK Government Working Paper; Planning Reform
strategic approach - no project-specific assessments
nature restoration fund - streamline developer contributions
Case Studies - Screening:
R v Cornwall County Council (2001)
Landfill site extension
council didn’t consider ‘EN information’ in EN statement (protected species)
approval before information assessed
screening seen as ‘box-ticking’ exercise rather than assessment of EIA requirement
Case Studies - Scoping:
West Carclaze Garden Village
1500 home development
Scoping opinion requested
in - landscape and visual, ecology (spp., rich grassland), heritage (clay mining)
out - coastal processes (inland), air quality
Case Studies - Baseline:
HS2
Strengths - multiseason, evolving surveys, comprehensive coverage
limitations - land-owners refusing, time, public scepticism, data overload
Case Studies - Impact Identification:
Hinkley Power Plant C
sensitive coastal system - EU protected
checklists 20+ themes
public highlighting visual intrusion
critiques
volume and complexity
over-reliance on experts
cumulative impacts to severn estuary not considered
Case Studies - Impact Prediction:
Hinkley Power Plant C
strengths - thermal plume modelling, sediment dispersion models, climate change, biodiversity impact
limitations - long-term, cumulative, assumptions of ecological behaviour
Case Studies - Mitigation:
Whitewool Farm
commercial enterprise - N credit for 2500 houses
2.2ha wetland, 6ha riparian woodland
4000kg N removal
concerns
insufficient surveys
wetland drying up in summer
legal agreement for monitoring
replication?
Case Studies - Public Participation:
Trawsfynydd Nuclear Power Station Decommissioning
3 options
plant employees, trade union, those in radius
questionnaire - 1% returned
caused change in plan
lack of formal scoping = more costly