Ch. 19- Civil Liberties

Marbury V Madison

Judicial Review

Glitgow V New York

Incorporation Theory (Apply protections of bill of rights)

Lemon V Kurtzman

Aid must be secular in intent

Epperson V Arkansas

Forbidding teaching of the scientific theory of evolution

Edwards V Aguillard

States cannot mandate teaching of creationism

Miller V California

Determine what’s obscene and what’s not

Tinker V Des Moines

Symbolic speech

United States V O’Brien

Burning draft cards is unconstitutional

Texas V Johnson

Flag burning is constitutional

Gideon V Wainwright

If accused cannot afford an attorney, one must be provided

Mapp V Ohio

Illegally obtained evidence cannot be used in trial

Miranda V Arizona

Miranda rights

Yates V U.S.

Urging someone to believe something cannot be illegal

Obergefell V Hodges

Legalized gay marriage

Brown V Board of Education

Desegregation of schools

Roe V Wade

Abortion rights

Gideon V Weignright

Right to legal counsel

Miranda V Arizona

Miranda rights

New York Times V U.S.

Freedom of the press

Engel V Vitale

Prohibited mandatory school prayer

Yates V U.S.

Communist party charged with violating Smith Act