International Relations Quiz #1

5.0(2)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/70

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

71 Terms

1
New cards
Anarchy
Absence of overarching power, Politics in the absence of a common sovereign, no higher authority than the states
2
New cards
Self-Help
there is no higher authority than the states so states must look out for their own interests. Nobody will step in to save them as nobody is authoritatively above them.
3
New cards
Security dilemma
Every time a state amasses power to make itself more secure, it threatens other states. This is because other states are unpredictable & states can never be sure what a state’s intentions are with this power.
4
New cards
Prisoner’s Dilemma
a particular "game" between two captured prisoners that illustrates why cooperation is difficult to maintain even when it is mutually beneficial (rationally, both will defect to ensure a lighter sentence because neither of them trust that the other will cooperate)
a particular "game" between two captured prisoners that illustrates why cooperation is difficult to maintain even when it is mutually beneficial (rationally, both will defect to ensure a lighter sentence because neither of them trust that the other will cooperate)
5
New cards
Cooperate (Prisoner’s Dilemma)
a decision to refrain from threatening action, thereby cooperating with the other state
6
New cards
Deflect (Prisoner’s Dilemma)
a decision to engage in the threatening action
7
New cards
What is the classic outcome of a prisoner’s dilemma?
If rational, both states will deflect to avoid their own worst outcome
8
New cards
Kenneth Waltz
founder of the defensive neorealism school of thought, wrote *The Man, State, and War*, came up with the 3 levels of analysis
9
New cards
John Mearsheimer
founder of the offensive neorealism school of thought
10
New cards
What are the assumptions that all realists share?
* States pursue power so they can survive in the international system
* Assume that security is the most important issue
* Assume that states are rational & will act in a cost/benefit manner
* All states have at least some offensive capabilities & can do something to harm another
* power is very important
* we live in an anarchic system
* concerned with security dilemmas
* thinks states are trying to balance power
11
New cards
What are the types of realism?
classical realism, neorealism, neoclassical realism
12
New cards
Sovereignty
A state’s right, at least in principle, to do whatever it wants within its own territory; traditionally, sovereignty is the most important international norm.
13
New cards
Polarity
Number of great powers in the international system at one time
14
New cards
Unipolar System
1 great power in the international system
15
New cards
Bipolar system
2 great powers in the international system
16
New cards
Multipolar system
3+ great powers in the international system
17
New cards
Power
The ability or potential to influence others’ behavior, as measured by the possession of certain tangible and intangible characteristics. Ability to achieve one’s goals.
18
New cards
Great Power
* Countries that have “power goodies”
* Significant economic & military power
* Influence politics beyond their borders (regionally)
* Ex. France, US, UK, China, Russia
19
New cards
Superpower
Influence global politics & project power globally
20
New cards
Hard Power
Military & economic strength, Works through carrots (inducements & bribes) & sticks (threats of punishment)
21
New cards
Soft Power
attraction, Persuasion, Attracting other states as a result of our reputational effects, convicning states cooperation is in their best interests
22
New cards
How can we measure power?
* GDP
* Size of military
* Military budget
* Military technology
23
New cards
Collective Goods Problem
* How can states cooperate to serve collective interests when doing so requires its members to forgo their individual interests?
* States prefer that other states provide the collective good while they “free ride”, enjoying the benefits without doing anything to help
24
New cards
Collective Good
something that everyone in the system gets to enjoy, REGARDLESS of who pays for it (ex. clean air, clean water)
25
New cards
When is it easier to provide a collective good?
it is easier when there are fewer actors because it is then easier to police freeriders
26
New cards
Nye’s Sovereignty Debate
rise of non-state actors causes people to reflect on the role of the state in there international system

3 main views:

\-Retreat of the state

\-Skeptics

\-Transformationalists
27
New cards
Retreat of the state view in the sovereignty debate
\-Believe the state is indeed in retreat

\-other actors are increasing in power (militarily & economically), like corporations & terrorist groups

\-structures above state can impose certain rules on what happens in the state, erosion of state sovereignty EX) EU's rules for members
28
New cards
Skeptic view in the sovereignty debate
Defend the idea that states are still sovereign & that the buck still stops with states. International organizations  are mere reflections of the state’s desires.
29
New cards
Transformationalist view in the sovereignty debate
* States are still primary actors, but we cannot ignore nonstate actors
* The context in which states act today involves nonstate actors
* Think about the way state power is being transformed by nonstate actors
30
New cards
Levels of Analysis
a perspective on IR based on a set of similar actors or processes that suggests possible explanations to “why” and “from where” questions, provides different frameworks to understand the same events from different perspectives and behaviors

the three are individual, domestic, & systemic
31
New cards
Individual Level of Analysis
\-concerns the perceptions, choices, and actions of individual human beings

\-Does it matter *who* is making the decisions?

\-Something about the character of the __individual__ causes this to occur
32
New cards
Rational
pursuing their goals & self-interests by MAXIMIZING these at the least cost
33
New cards
Domestic Level of Analysis
\-Something about the character of the __state__ causes this to occur

\-Does the *domestic character* of the state or *domestic politics* matter for outcomes?

\-ex. regime type
34
New cards
Bureaucratic politics model of the domestic level of analysis
* State is not a unitary actor
* Where you stand on foreign politics depends on where you sit in domestic government
* Ex. CIA has different foreign policy ideals than some members of Congress
* State does not just have one goal, not everyone agrees on everything
35
New cards
Character of the state model of the domestic level of analysis
NOT dividing the state into parts & looking at the push & pull, you are looking @ the state as a whole & its characteristics (ex. regime type, economy, ideology)
36
New cards
Systemic level of analysis
* State of the international system
* Does the way that the international system is organized best explain the behavior of states?
* looks at STRUCTURE & PROCESS
37
New cards
Four main subfields of political science
\-American

\-International Relations

\-Political Theory

\-Comparative Politics
38
New cards
what is scientific about political science?
Observes the cardinal rules of scientific logic
39
New cards
Steps of IR
\-Definition/Description

\-Explanation

\-Prediction

\-Prescription
40
New cards
What does IR study?
Relations between world governments or states
41
New cards
different historical systems
•Modern State System (Treaty Westphalia 1648)

\-World Imperial System

\-Feudal System
42
New cards
Why are states unique in the international system?
•Territory (Control Borders)

•Militaries

•Tax
43
New cards
Nation-State
\-Nation = people

\-State = territory

a state where people all share a nationality, culture, language, etc.

there are few true nation states
44
New cards
Nationalism
intense love of the state that is an important ideational cause of war
45
New cards
non-state actors
groups other than states that attempt to play a role in the international system
46
New cards
IGO
intergovernmental organizations, state governments are members of these organizations (ex. European Union)
47
New cards
non-governmental organizations
an international organization not made of state actors (ex. Doctors Without Borders)
48
New cards
Multinational Corporations
Companies that operate across national boundaries (ex. McDonald's)
49
New cards
terrorist group
A group that utilizes violence to political ends (ISIS)
50
New cards
Globalization
increasing interconnectedness of states throughout the world
51
New cards
globalization is not new but...
the pace has increased, altered by technology
52
New cards
Free-Rider Problem
one state pays for a collective good, everyone else enjoys the benefit
53
New cards
marxism and feminism
different epistemologies- disagree with theories of the ability to do "value-free" science
54
New cards
Realists think state should…
balance against power

prioritize self-help
55
New cards
subfields of IR
International security, international political economy, International law and organization
56
New cards
Rational Choice Theory
individuals act to maximize their own self-interest
57
New cards
Bounded Rationality
leaders aren't perfectly rational, they are boundedly rational (don't have enough time, correct info, emotionality)
58
New cards
Affective Bias
individuals are emotional beings, positive/negative feelings about another leader or country
59
New cards
Cognitive Bias
humans want to get rid of cognitive dissonance - when information doesn't match our expectations we explain it away or don't give it value as truth
60
New cards
Groupthink
individuals in groups want to go along with majority so they don't do cost benefit analysis, groups are more likely to take risks because blame is dispersed
61
New cards
Prospect Theory
people are more risk averse in the domain of gains than in losses- more willing to risk to not lose something than to gain something
62
New cards
Crisis Management
in a crisis there isn't time for leaders to fully consider all options, intense mental pressure, lack of sleep
63
New cards
Systemic Level of Analysis Strength
explain likelihood of events
64
New cards
Systemic Level of Analysis Weakness
doesn't explain timing or deviations from rationality
65
New cards
Domestic Level of Analysis Strength
useful for understanding why states might behave differently toward different countries that are similarly positioned in the international system
66
New cards
Domestic Level of Analysis Weakness
ignores that these domestic institutions are still a part of a larger international system and that may influence their behavior

doesn't explain all behavior (US supported oppressive regimes like El Salvador)
67
New cards
Individual Level of Analysis Strength
helpful to understand timing of events, helpful for explaining events after the fact
68
New cards
Individual Level of Analysis Weakness
not good a predicting the future- individuals are unpredictable
69
New cards
Relative Power
ratio of power between two states
70
New cards
Balance of Power
Condition of roughly equal strength between opposing countries or alliances of countries.
71
New cards
Power Conversion
* knowing what is the most valuable power resource at any specific time & being able to convert this power when needed
* Ex. convert economic power to military power