1/39
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
early contact between France/GB and FN was mostly
trade and military alliances sometimes treaties were made but the relationships were balanced
peace and friendship treaties 1725-1779
Britain desired trade and settlement so signed a treaty with Mikmaq, Malliseet and Passamaquoddy FN on the east coast
5 aspects to peace and friendship treaties
share land
no ceding of land
peaceful, autonomous coexistence
obligations and benefits for FN and British
legally binding still
how and why did in the 1800s the FN economy change
in 1800s FN economy relied on fur trade and Bison hunt but mid 1800s changes occurred where western fur trade declined, European settlement in W Canada increased and large scale agriculture introduced in W
as the economy changes in the mid 1800s FN and government relationship changes to be
allies/equal partners no more
seen as subordinates
treaties become unbalanced and not mutually beneficial
what does Canada want mid 1800s
settlement and control
use treaties to extinguish FN title to land and resources
the numbered treaties cover and did what for Canada
covers most of western Canada and granted Canada access to Ruperts land and promise support to FN and binds Canada to a relationship with FN
1763 Royal Proclamation
british crown could take land form FN after public negotiations
why would FN sign the numbered treaties
they offered cultural protection
with demise of bison wasn't lot of food (food aid with treaties
got promised to help with farming
help prevent disease
FN wanted to avoid US exp of war territorial loss etc.
why did Canada sing treaties
avoid US exp of war ($$)
gain access to FN land (sttlmnt resources etc)
control of Fn pop
misunderstandings of treaties (2)
1) CAN focussed on final agreement FN didn't understand much so they did discussions and promises as form of negotiation which were oral and outside promises
2) Can made treaties as final and non neg. but FN wanted it to be living (can change) Canada believed it was owning land and FN belief of sharing land
CAN said FN surrendered rights to land and res. but FN believed they were sharing
language was a big issue as FN didn't have words to understand legal terms so they were given NWMP and priests to give advice but still hard to translate and they didn't have concept of owning land
interpretations of treaties today
literal:limitwd to what is in document
spirit and intent: includes oral promises broadens the treaty
how do we know today what happened
diary entries match oral tradition
FN refer to numbered treaties as _______ ________ and also
sacred covenants, tri partite agreements(create British crown fn
how were the treaties sacred
pipes passed, gifts exchanged to symbolize eagreemtn, relationship and essence of creator
with the pipe passing and gift exchange how did the 2 parties see this
GB: land rights extinguished for payments
FN: agreement to share lands and resources
Duncan Campbell Scott wanted
to assimilate indians
how did the BNA act assimilate Indians
made Canada responsible for them and also dint include Inuit and metis until later and also ignored FN diversity
Indian act 1876
made FN ward of the state (treated them as minors or infirm no mental capacity to make decision or orphans) they weren't equal and had few legal rights Fed had exclusive power over FN and their land
John A macdonalds goal
to assimilate FN people as quickly as possible
indian agents
created by Indian act to live in reserves working for feds to
enforce government policies
manage financial affairs
spend $$ of reserve without permission
finally authority on schools health care social services given by fed
could start an election remove leaders or become chief
treaties were partnerships and involved negotiation did the Indian act?
no, passed without consultation
amended man times with little consultation
with the Indian act many things came like
residential schools
indian agent
pass system
ceremonies illegal
no voting
legal rep for FN outlawed
peasant farming policy
Indian act also defined
who was an Indian
what did status Indian benefits give
ability to live on res, hunting rights annuities ($)etc
you can lose status if
you went to uni
became doctor
lawyer
minister
(most professions)
status female marrying non male (kids have no status too)
Indian act government includes
chief and council elected every 2 years (gov can overturn election or remove chief)
band council can pass bylaws but fed gov can disallow this
can't make improvements to property without fed perms
most reserve land/prop owned by fed gov
on what grounds can a chief be removed
dishonesty, intemperance, immortality, incompetence
colonization
action or process of settling among and establishing control over the indigenous people of an area
what group has a similar experience as Canadian FN
Australias aborigine
US also have similar tactics to take over western us such as
unfulfilled treated
reservations
residential schools
low standards of living for Indians today
people who were assimilated in Scandinavia
sami poeple
inter generational trauma
transmission of historical oppression/trauma and its negative consequences across generations
1911 greater Winnipeg had a population of 215,000+ but what was their water source
Assiniboine river but had rusting pipes and causing sickness
in 1913 what did engineers in wpg report
Shoal lake had pristine water and uninhabited expect a few Indians
Winnipeg paid Ottawa how much for how much land to get water
2,000 to get 3,000 acres to access shoal lake water
what did Winnipeg do that did something bad to shoal lake
construction of aqueduct made a peninsula into an island
since the 1990s shoal lake 40 had lived with
boil water advisory
annually how much money does Winnipeg make from water services, how much goes to shoal lake
25+ mill in revenue and 0 to shoal lake 40
social indicators
statistical measures that describe social trends and conditions impacting human well being