1/41
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Organisational design
The process of selecting and managing aspects of organisational structure and culture to enable the organisation to achieve its goals
Organisational structure
The formal system of task, power and reporting relationships
Organisational chart
Diagram of the chain of command and reporting relationships in a company
Span of control
The number of people reporting directly to an individual, narrow = expensive, closer supervision vs wider = more autonomy
Division of labor
The degree to which employees specialize, high = more specialsied vs low = generalised
Hierarchy
The degree to which some employees have formal authroity over others, too much = too much power to top management/lead more unethical behaviour vs too little = problems when need control
Formalisation
Extent organisational roles, procedures and communications are noted and followed, high = little flexibility in decison-making
Centralisation
Degree which power and decision-making authority concentrated at a higher level rather than distributed, high = clear lines of comms, managers solely responsible vs decentralised = lower levels more power and autonomy in decisions
Decentralized organisations
The authority for making decisions affecting an organisation is distributed
Centralized organisations
Concentrate power and decision-making authority at higher levels of the organisation
Mechanistic organisations
Rigid, traditional bureaucracies with centralized power and hierararchial communications
Organic organisations
Flexible, decentralized structures with less clear lines of authority, decentralized power, open communication channels, and a focus on adaptability in helping employees accomplish goals
Determiant of structure: Business strategy
Simple designs for simple strategies vs complex designs for complex processes, match structure to strategy for higher firm performance
Determinant of structure: External environment
Rapid change environments need flexible, decentralised authority to process and adjust to change
Determinant of structure: Organisational talent
Flexible structure best for highly skilled workers with flat/team-based strucuture
Determinant of structure: Organisational size
small organisation = less bureucracy vs large organisation = greater specialisation/hierarchy
Determinant of structure: behavioural expectations
Expectations how employees should behave, encouraged attitutdes/suppress, based on company values. Expect decision-making/collab = decentralised and flat structure vs expect following explicit rules = hierarchy and centralised structures
Determinant of structure: production technology
Firm using unit production = small batches, employee talent more important, complex unprogrammed, need flat structure ad low span of control vs mass production = large generalised products, tall structure and wide span of control vs continuous production = constant production, mechanistic structure, low supervision
Determinant of structure: organisational change
Organisation change strategies and adapt chaning environments, modify structure to support change
Bureaucratic structure
An organisational structure with formal division of labor, hierarchy, and standardization of work procedures
Prebureaucratic structure
Smaller organisations with low standardization, total centralisation, and mostly one-on-one communication
Functional structure
An organisational structure that groups people with the same skills, or who use similar tools or work processes, together into departments
Division
A collection of functions organised around a particular geographic area, product or service, or market
Global product division structure
functional attitudes controlled by product group, local management involvement low, good when global integration large and local difference is small e.g. mcdonalds
Global area division structure
Regional/country managers substantial autonomy to fit strategy to local situations, good when local difference is large and benefits local integration small
Global transnational division structure
Balanced matrix between local and headquarters, 2-way flow, best when global integration and local responsiveness needed
Regional headquarters structure
Regional headquarters established in geographic area, collab with product division to give local units clear goals and directions, best when balance global integration and local responsiveness
Matrix structure
Employees report to both a project or product team and to a functional manager
Team-based structure
Horizontal or vertical teams define part or all of the organisation
Lattice structure
Cross-functional and cross-level subteams are formed and dissolved as necessary to complete specific projects and tasks
Network organisation
A collection of autonomous units or firms that act as a single larger entity, using social mechanisms for coordination and control
Joint payoff
Network organised around specific products and projects, payment arranged based off final product, product doesnt make it = no profit, motivates people to do better
Restricted access
Restrict exchanges to long-term partners, more dependent on each other. Increase future business chances, decreases incentive for taking advantage over another or get killed out = losing opportunity of future work
Virtual organisation
An organisation that contracts out almost all of its functions except for the company name and managing the coordination among the contractors
Communities of practice
Groups of people whose shared expertise and interest in a joint enterprise informally bind them together
Unit production
Producing in small batches or making one-of-a-kind custom products
Mass production
Producing large volumes of identical products
Continuous production
Machines constantly make the product
Liaison role
A manager or team member is held formally accoutnable for communicating and coordinating with other groups
Direct contact
Managers from different units informally work together to coordinate or to identify and solve shared problems
Task force
A temporary committee formed to address a specific project or problem
Cross-functional team
A permanent task force created to address specific problems or recurring needs