1/5
p194-6
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
CRITICISMS: of Marxism and feminist theories of the family
PLP
Assumption that trad. N.F. family dominant ignores increasing family diversity
Compared to 50 years ago, families today come in various forms, including single-parent families, blended families, and same-sex families, challenging traditional norms
Structural theories assume family members are passive puppets, when in reality we have some choice in shaping our family dynamics and roles
To truly understand families, we have to focus on meaning given to situations, not supposed functions of families
Approach to sociology
‘Bottom up’
Emphasis on meanings family members hold and how these shape actions and relationships
View of relationships
Beyond genetic and marital ties
Can only understand people through their ties
Additional relationships that can impact how we act and are seen by members as significant and give sense of belonging, identity and relatedness
Friends
Fictive kin (close friends treated as kin)
Chosen families (gay and lesbian)
Dead relatives
Pets
Not always positive
Perform important roles like provision of sense of belonging and relatedness
Tipper (2011) - pets
Children frequently saw pets as part of the family
Smart and Nordqvist (2014) - donor-conceived children
Issue of genes raised range of feelings
Some parents emphasise importance of social relationships over genetic ones in forming family bonds
Erin defined motherhood as time and effort put into a child
Difficult feelings arise if children noticed to look like their non-genetic parent
Parents wonder about donor’s identity and donor siblings, and if these people count as family
Those that know the donor’s identity ask if donor’s family count as family to their child
Lesbians
Concerns about equality between genetic and non-genetic mothers
Concerns that donor may be treated as ‘real’ second parent
CRITICISM: PLP
Too broad
Ignore what’s special about blood/marriage relationships