Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
5 myths/misconceptions of learning
intelligence is pre-determined
easy learning is more helpful than effortful learning
memorization is not a part of real learning
learning styles are the most helpful over learning with all 5 senses
repetition and massed practice is helpful
What % of information learned in the classroom will not be recalled?
70%
Problems with conventional approaches
brain function: the brain’s energy is focused on survival
academic education: formal education is unnatural
we think we are more intelligent than we are: we don’t know what we don’t know
fluency allusion: understanding something doesn’t mean we recall it
familiarity trap: exposure to information doesn’t guarantee we can recall it
What are the characteristics of helpful learning?
effort-based: the harder it is to remember = better chance of recall
broadly applicable: the more you can connect specifics to the bigger picture, the better you will remember it
meaningful: if you care about it, you will remember it
What are the 3 stages of learning?
encoding
consolidation
retrieval
What is necessary for retrieval to be characterized as?
effortful
delayed
repeated
What is helpful for retrieval to be characterized as?
spaced (when)
interleaved (what)
varied (how)
What kind of retrieval methods do not work?
massed practice
blocked practice
What are the 3 advanced methods of retrieval?
generation
reflection
schematizing
What is the aim of science?
to develop a body of knowledge which is justified and true
yet, pessimistic meta induction suggests that since our past findings in science were proved to be wrong, that what we believe to be true now is also wrong
knowledge must be justified with reason and evidence
we may not be closer to Knowledge, but we are further from ignorance
science is an action, not a thing
What is the aim of technology?
to employ justified beliefs and achieve practical solutions to concrete problems
truth has no application to technology, it only aims to create efficient solutions
technology has no morality; it cannot be classified as right or wrong
all technology is a product of mankind
What is the definitional difference between science and technology?
the aims: science aims to gain knowledge through justified truth, and technology aims to gain knowledge through belief
their purposes: science aims to develop a body of knowledge, and technology aims to create practical solutions to concrete problems
science is harder and about knowledge (justified truth)
technology is about application (justified belief); technology works best with other technologies (complementary technology)
What is the historical difference between science and technology?
technology has been around longer than science and prompted scientific development
TECH - Medieval: Greeks interested but no methodology or experimentation; Romans not interested in the things the greeks were (aquaducts, bridges, roadways, arches, buildings)
TECH - Middle Ages: plow, horse collar, watermill, and windmill
SCI WITH TECH - modern: heliocentric model from spyglass, weight of air from air pump, thermodynamics from steam engine, chemistry from Bessemer process
What are the developmental differences between science and technology?
both develop incrementally, but science is punctured by noncumulative growth
What are the key similarities between science and technology?
they are both systems of belief that require justification
What is knowledge?
true justified belief
What is truth?
NOT subjective, corresponds with reality
What is justification?
reason + evidence
the work of normal science
What is pessimistic meta induction?
the idea that science will continue to prove itself to be wrong over and over
all science’s efforts to describe reality will turn out to be false inevitably
example: the earth was not the center of our galaxy; heliocentric model proved to be truth
What does the optimistic view of meta induction consist of?
each failed scientific idea was followed by a better and true one
just as science can be seen as constant failures, it can also be seen as constant advancement
What is inductive inference and how is it ampliative?
draws a generalized conclusion from a limited data set
amplifies the data
Explain how science is corrigible.
science still can produce incorrect answers despite how experienced an experimentalist may be
science cannot be expected to be perfect because it is the product of human beings
science is constantly changing with new observations
the best and most justified information will prevail
we are not getting more right, but we are getting less wrong
What is a theory according to science? To the public?
science: a body of justified beliefs building from a set of observations to general claims which describe or explain a domain of phenomena
public: a guess; not justified
What is a hypothesis according to science? To the public?
science: a proposed explanation for causal relationships; must be empirically testable to be considered scientific
public: a proposed idea that has not been tested or verified
What is a law according to science? To the public?
science: a body of justified beliefs building from a set of observations to general claims which describe or explain a domain of directly observable phenomena; considered an old term
a fact or true statement that is not to be negotiated
What is technoscience?
the recent intersection of science and technology
cutting edge science requires cutting edge technology, and cutting edge technology requires more sophisticated technology (they build on each other)
examples: biomedicine, semiconductor, nanotechnology
Explain penicillin, the implications, and the scaling up process.
don’t need to know :)
Explain the development of the camera and photography with vertical and horizontal development.
steps:
4 things created first camera: paper, camera obscura, chemistry, and lenses (complimentary technologies)
paper was further developed into film
George Eastman created the Kodak Brownie
vertical development: one piece of technology improves over time
horizontal development: complementary technologies come together to make one better technology
social motivation: portraits were only affordable by the rich; the middle class emerged; the middle class was able to get their pictures taken as it was more affordable; photographer’s and painter’s jobs were ended as the Kodak Brownie emerged
Explain the Sony Walkman example and how it can be indirect.
consumers first told Sony we did not want the Walkman, but then it gained popularity
allowed for individual experience and privacy through separation
technological determinism: technology drives humans
singles became popular
we don’t know the outcomes of our own technology
we don’t know what we want until we have it; consumers are not good judges of what they think they want
an example of incremental development
Cowles hypothesis
order: hypothesis, evidence for it, criticism, takeaway
Crustaceous period
sterilized males through heating up of the earth
tested Galileo’s assumption that the larger the surface area the greater the volume proportionally
Cowles concluded dinosaurs could not cool down fast enough and confirmed that Galileo was right with alligator experiment which created Cowles theory
crtiques:
tissue could not fossilize
this assumes they could not regulate their own temperature
marine life died out too
there is no “close enough” in science
bad science
gained traction because it seemed “sciencey”
Seigel
order: hypothesis, evidence for it, criticism, takeaway
angiosperms had psychoactive agents with were toxic
fossils were found in mangled configurations
animals were found to self administer alcohol (elephants drank beer when anxious although they did not like any drink above 7% concentration)
critiques:
livers and tongues do not fossilize
we have no evidence that they could taste bitterness or digest toxins
angiosperms developed 10 million years before the Crustaceous period
social motivation: it got traction because of the cultural relevance
was not testable, generous, or expansive; people only cared because it was relevant
time: 80s
Alvarez
order: hypothesis, evidence for it, criticism, takeaway
A comet hit the earth, created a dust cloud, and cooled down the earth to temperatures that life could not survive and stopped photosynthesis
oceanic plankton died from this lack of photosynthesis
plants survived through the dormancy of their seeds
social motivation: we tend to be blinded to the science because of the fear of extinction; socially relevant due to the fear of nuclear war
time: 80s
iridium was found on the outer layer of the earth from space
testable, generous, expansive
gave scientists more to test and research
good/real science
What are complementary technologies?
technologies that go together/come from each other
What is scaling up?
making a product distributable on a big scale; penicillin example
Social motivation
address for developmental topics
What is a paradigm?
the framework or lens through which scientists see their work
WHAT: the theories accepted snd believed by researchers in the discipline
HOW: the standards of the discipline
WHY: the outstanding questions and phenomena that the paradigm should solve or explain
anomalies: phenomena the paradigm should explain but doesn’t
What is a paradigm shift? (scientific development/revolution)
also called a scientific revolution
steps:
anomalies emerge due to gaps in knowledge that the hypothesis can’t explain
a new hypothesis gets suggested that can explain anomalies
the old hypothesis is favored due to how much time it has been around and evidence
when 2 hypotheses are so different that they can’t be put again each other, they are incommensurable
crucial evidence comes along to prove one theory wrong
a scientific crisis ensues, and everything we knew up until the shift gets proven wrong
Identify what boyle and the royal society contributed.
they were geniuses
Royal Society:
public experimentation: the public will only believe what we see
qualified observers must be present to have a takeaway
Boyle:
wanted to bring science to the people
reporting: careful recording of experimental results
replication: an experiment must be replicable for its results to be credible
What is science (not aims)?
fruitful mode of inquiry
body of knowledge
generous, testable, expansive
What is normal science?
the incremental phase of scientific development characterized by what the majority of researchers in a given scientific discipline hold to be true; in simple words = what is considered right in science
What is falsification?
the process used to determine if an experiment’s unexpected results are the result of faulty experiment execution, a faulty premise, or a faulty hypothesis; in simple words = finding what is false and eliminating it
What is causality?
events linked by necessity
What is correlation?
events linked by proximity; no necessary relationship
What is a coincidence?
no relationship between events